Seek Returns logo

FN vs. MCHP: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at FN and MCHP, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolFNMCHP
Company NameFabrinetMicrochip Technology Incorporated
CountryCayman IslandsUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS IndustryElectronic Equipment, Instruments & ComponentsSemiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment
Market Capitalization13.27 billion USD34.77 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateJune 25, 2010March 19, 1993
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FN and MCHP by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FN vs. MCHP: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFNMCHP
5-Day Price Return-0.56%-1.13%
13-Week Price Return23.73%-10.56%
26-Week Price Return74.67%26.23%
52-Week Price Return52.07%-20.15%
Month-to-Date Return10.06%-0.17%
Year-to-Date Return65.83%11.79%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.53M7.31M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.63M8.61M
3-Month Volatility51.01%34.03%
Beta1.041.47

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FN

17.60%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
21.57%
Q3
13.27%
Median
8.55%
Q1
4.42%
Min
-4.21%

In the upper quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, FN’s Return on Equity of 17.60% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

MCHP

-2.26%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
47.13%
Q3
23.50%
Median
9.94%
Q1
0.86%
Min
-20.69%

MCHP has a negative Return on Equity of -2.26%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

FN vs. MCHP: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FN

9.72%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
17.31%
Q3
10.85%
Median
7.26%
Q1
3.13%
Min
-3.00%

FN’s Net Profit Margin of 9.72% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

MCHP

-3.50%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
52.41%
Q3
23.88%
Median
10.17%
Q1
1.21%
Min
-32.15%

MCHP has a negative Net Profit Margin of -3.50%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

FN vs. MCHP: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FN

9.49%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
30.04%
Q3
15.08%
Median
9.55%
Q1
4.27%
Min
-3.83%

FN’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.49% is around the midpoint for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

MCHP

2.54%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
58.09%
Q3
27.54%
Median
11.18%
Q1
3.31%
Min
-28.36%

MCHP’s Operating Profit Margin of 2.54% is in the lower quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

FN vs. MCHP: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFNMCHP
Return on Equity (TTM)17.60%-2.26%
Return on Assets (TTM)12.75%-0.96%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)9.72%-3.50%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)9.49%2.54%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)12.09%54.48%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FN

3.00

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
4.57
Q3
2.85
Median
2.03
Q1
1.51
Min
0.62

FN’s Current Ratio of 3.00 is in the upper quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

MCHP

2.31

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
6.58
Q3
4.24
Median
2.73
Q1
2.13
Min
1.02

MCHP’s Current Ratio of 2.31 aligns with the median group of the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

FN vs. MCHP: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FN

0.00

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
1.14
Q3
0.54
Median
0.30
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, FN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

MCHP

0.80

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
1.09
Q3
0.48
Median
0.25
Q1
0.01
Min
0.00

MCHP’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.80. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

FN vs. MCHP: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FN

15.04

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
79.05
Q3
36.62
Median
12.51
Q1
3.72
Min
-18.73

FN’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 15.04 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

MCHP

1.16

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
174.00
Q3
74.71
Median
26.06
Q1
6.43
Min
-7.80

In the lower quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, MCHP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.16 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

FN vs. MCHP: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFNMCHP
Current Ratio (MRQ)3.002.31
Quick Ratio (MRQ)2.231.33
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.000.80
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)15.041.16

Growth

Revenue Growth

FN vs. MCHP: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FN vs. MCHP: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FN

0.00%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
5.36%
Q3
2.53%
Median
1.28%
Q1
0.16%
Min
0.00%

FN currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

MCHP

2.91%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
3.72%
Q3
1.51%
Median
0.69%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 2.91%, MCHP offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

FN vs. MCHP: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FN

0.00%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
218.94%
Q3
90.25%
Median
38.81%
Q1
3.69%
Min
0.00%

FN has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

MCHP

123.62%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
205.27%
Q3
88.01%
Median
27.13%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MCHP’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 123.62% is in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

FN vs. MCHP: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFNMCHP
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%2.91%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%123.62%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FN

39.18

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
74.74
Q3
42.40
Median
26.55
Q1
20.05
Min
10.12

FN’s P/E Ratio of 39.18 is within the middle range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

MCHP

--

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
106.30
Q3
61.93
Median
38.96
Q1
23.71
Min
13.06

P/E Ratio data for MCHP is currently unavailable.

FN vs. MCHP: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FN

3.81

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.79
Q3
3.58
Median
2.05
Q1
1.29
Min
0.20

FN’s P/S Ratio of 3.81 is in the upper echelon for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

MCHP

8.14

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
19.99
Q3
10.21
Median
5.23
Q1
2.88
Min
1.13

MCHP’s P/S Ratio of 8.14 aligns with the market consensus for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

FN vs. MCHP: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FN

5.34

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.92
Q3
3.80
Median
2.23
Q1
1.42
Min
0.44

FN’s P/B Ratio of 5.34 is in the upper tier for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

MCHP

5.54

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
14.22
Q3
6.94
Median
4.29
Q1
1.99
Min
0.67

MCHP’s P/B Ratio of 5.54 is within the conventional range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

FN vs. MCHP: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFNMCHP
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)39.18--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.818.14
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)5.345.54
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)63.0747.51