Seek Returns logo

FN vs. FTV: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at FN and FTV, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolFNFTV
Company NameFabrinetFortive Corporation
CountryCayman IslandsUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyIndustrials
GICS IndustryElectronic Equipment, Instruments & ComponentsMachinery
Market Capitalization12.09 billion USD16.49 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJune 25, 2010July 5, 2016
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FN and FTV by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FN vs. FTV: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFNFTV
5-Day Price Return0.66%2.70%
13-Week Price Return56.60%-33.92%
26-Week Price Return52.74%-38.97%
52-Week Price Return62.71%-28.68%
Month-to-Date Return4.19%1.67%
Year-to-Date Return53.41%-35.03%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.61M5.20M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.65M3.85M
3-Month Volatility36.59%55.22%
Beta1.051.09

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FN

17.83%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
29.99%
Q3
15.78%
Median
9.05%
Q1
5.63%
Min
-9.55%

In the upper quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, FN’s Return on Equity of 17.83% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

FTV

7.44%

Machinery Industry

Max
34.68%
Q3
19.06%
Median
13.13%
Q1
8.53%
Min
-4.87%

FTV’s Return on Equity of 7.44% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

FN vs. FTV: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FN

10.00%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
25.55%
Q3
12.80%
Median
7.58%
Q1
3.09%
Min
-8.70%

FN’s Net Profit Margin of 10.00% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

FTV

12.51%

Machinery Industry

Max
19.74%
Q3
11.24%
Median
8.13%
Q1
5.38%
Min
-1.11%

A Net Profit Margin of 12.51% places FTV in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

FN vs. FTV: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FN

9.46%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
30.04%
Q3
16.04%
Median
9.75%
Q1
4.27%
Min
-12.63%

FN’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.46% is around the midpoint for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

FTV

17.22%

Machinery Industry

Max
26.63%
Q3
16.15%
Median
11.27%
Q1
7.72%
Min
-4.91%

An Operating Profit Margin of 17.22% places FTV in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

FN vs. FTV: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFNFTV
Return on Equity (TTM)17.83%7.44%
Return on Assets (TTM)13.14%4.40%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)10.00%12.51%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)9.46%17.22%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)12.09%59.78%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FN

3.32

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
4.43
Q3
2.88
Median
2.05
Q1
1.52
Min
0.64

FN’s Current Ratio of 3.32 is in the upper quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

FTV

0.98

Machinery Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.32
Median
1.72
Q1
1.28
Min
0.78

FTV’s Current Ratio of 0.98 falls into the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

FN vs. FTV: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FN

0.00

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
1.14
Q3
0.54
Median
0.34
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, FN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

FTV

0.46

Machinery Industry

Max
1.49
Q3
0.75
Median
0.44
Q1
0.26
Min
0.00

FTV’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.46 is typical for the Machinery industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

FN vs. FTV: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FN

14.97

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
101.00
Q3
43.88
Median
13.27
Q1
3.73
Min
-18.73

FN’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 14.97 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

FTV

6.04

Machinery Industry

Max
67.55
Q3
33.79
Median
13.87
Q1
7.97
Min
-1.43

In the lower quartile for the Machinery industry, FTV’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 6.04 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

FN vs. FTV: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFNFTV
Current Ratio (MRQ)3.320.98
Quick Ratio (MRQ)2.510.77
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.000.46
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)14.976.04

Growth

Revenue Growth

FN vs. FTV: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FN vs. FTV: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FN

0.00%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
4.86%
Q3
2.53%
Median
1.28%
Q1
0.16%
Min
0.00%

FN currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

FTV

0.67%

Machinery Industry

Max
5.32%
Q3
2.84%
Median
1.87%
Q1
1.09%
Min
0.00%

FTV’s Dividend Yield of 0.67% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

FN vs. FTV: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FN

0.00%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
161.37%
Q3
67.12%
Median
34.46%
Q1
3.82%
Min
0.00%

FN has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

FTV

14.22%

Machinery Industry

Max
202.17%
Q3
98.65%
Median
55.54%
Q1
29.03%
Min
0.00%

FTV’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 14.22% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

FN vs. FTV: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFNFTV
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.67%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%14.22%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FN

38.24

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
73.87
Q3
41.11
Median
25.31
Q1
18.58
Min
8.59

FN’s P/E Ratio of 38.24 is within the middle range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

FTV

21.32

Machinery Industry

Max
53.66
Q3
31.29
Median
22.00
Q1
16.18
Min
7.00

FTV’s P/E Ratio of 21.32 is within the middle range for the Machinery industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

FN vs. FTV: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FN

3.83

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.74
Q3
3.49
Median
2.03
Q1
1.16
Min
0.11

FN’s P/S Ratio of 3.83 is in the upper echelon for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

FTV

2.67

Machinery Industry

Max
5.04
Q3
2.72
Median
1.67
Q1
1.04
Min
0.24

FTV’s P/S Ratio of 2.67 aligns with the market consensus for the Machinery industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

FN vs. FTV: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FN

3.68

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.45
Q3
3.49
Median
1.98
Q1
1.31
Min
0.35

FN’s P/B Ratio of 3.68 is in the upper tier for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

FTV

2.34

Machinery Industry

Max
7.23
Q3
3.90
Median
2.52
Q1
1.47
Min
0.49

FTV’s P/B Ratio of 2.34 is within the conventional range for the Machinery industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

FN vs. FTV: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFNFTV
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)38.2421.32
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.832.67
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.682.34
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)45.8311.83