FMS vs. TEM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
Updated onHere’s a clear look at FMS and TEM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.
Company Profile
FMS trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, TEM is a standard domestic listing.
Symbol | FMS | TEM |
---|---|---|
Company Name | Fresenius Medical Care AG | Tempus AI, Inc. |
Country | Germany | United States |
GICS Sector | Health Care | Health Care |
GICS Industry | Health Care Providers & Services | Life Sciences Tools & Services |
Market Capitalization | 15.71 billion USD | 16.17 billion USD |
Exchange | NYSE | NasdaqGS |
Listing Date | September 17, 1996 | June 14, 2024 |
Security Type | ADR | Common Stock |
Historical Performance
This chart compares the performance of FMS and TEM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Historical Performance at a Glance
Symbol | FMS | TEM |
---|---|---|
5-Day Price Return | 3.76% | 15.33% |
13-Week Price Return | -4.94% | 60.46% |
26-Week Price Return | 0.00% | 97.12% |
52-Week Price Return | 20.75% | 90.11% |
Month-to-Date Return | 2.04% | 15.33% |
Year-to-Date Return | 3.19% | 175.71% |
10-Day Avg. Volume | 0.45M | 7.56M |
3-Month Avg. Volume | 0.52M | 10.48M |
3-Month Volatility | 21.87% | 64.12% |
Beta | 0.61 | 3.25 |
Profitability
Return on Equity (TTM)
FMS
4.70%
Health Care Providers & Services Industry
- Max
- 24.86%
- Q3
- 15.79%
- Median
- 8.56%
- Q1
- 5.75%
- Min
- -1.64%
FMS’s Return on Equity of 4.70% is in the lower quartile for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.
TEM
-107.12%
Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry
- Max
- 19.96%
- Q3
- 11.51%
- Median
- 6.47%
- Q1
- 3.86%
- Min
- -6.95%
TEM has a negative Return on Equity of -107.12%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.
Net Profit Margin (TTM)
FMS
3.36%
Health Care Providers & Services Industry
- Max
- 11.56%
- Q3
- 5.45%
- Median
- 2.83%
- Q1
- 1.13%
- Min
- -1.71%
FMS’s Net Profit Margin of 3.36% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.
TEM
-20.98%
Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry
- Max
- 32.18%
- Q3
- 18.30%
- Median
- 10.19%
- Q1
- 4.20%
- Min
- -2.05%
TEM has a negative Net Profit Margin of -20.98%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)
FMS
7.57%
Health Care Providers & Services Industry
- Max
- 19.08%
- Q3
- 9.66%
- Median
- 4.77%
- Q1
- 2.46%
- Min
- -0.83%
FMS’s Operating Profit Margin of 7.57% is around the midpoint for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.
TEM
-24.66%
Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry
- Max
- 38.39%
- Q3
- 21.40%
- Median
- 13.57%
- Q1
- 8.38%
- Min
- -3.51%
TEM has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -24.66%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.
Profitability at a Glance
Symbol | FMS | TEM |
---|---|---|
Return on Equity (TTM) | 4.70% | -107.12% |
Return on Assets (TTM) | 2.02% | -15.77% |
Net Profit Margin (TTM) | 3.36% | -20.98% |
Operating Profit Margin (TTM) | 7.57% | -24.66% |
Gross Profit Margin (TTM) | 24.67% | 60.73% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
FMS
1.44
Health Care Providers & Services Industry
- Max
- 2.00
- Q3
- 1.51
- Median
- 1.29
- Q1
- 0.92
- Min
- 0.14
FMS’s Current Ratio of 1.44 aligns with the median group of the Health Care Providers & Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.
TEM
1.54
Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry
- Max
- 3.46
- Q3
- 2.78
- Median
- 1.91
- Q1
- 1.53
- Min
- 0.43
TEM’s Current Ratio of 1.54 aligns with the median group of the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)
FMS
0.83
Health Care Providers & Services Industry
- Max
- 2.29
- Q3
- 1.24
- Median
- 0.74
- Q1
- 0.50
- Min
- 0.00
FMS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.83 is typical for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.
TEM
2.58
Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry
- Max
- 1.35
- Q3
- 0.74
- Median
- 0.41
- Q1
- 0.18
- Min
- 0.00
With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.58, TEM operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)
FMS
5.73
Health Care Providers & Services Industry
- Max
- 14.47
- Q3
- 7.50
- Median
- 4.52
- Q1
- 2.12
- Min
- -4.44
FMS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.73 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.
TEM
-14.08
Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry
- Max
- 45.00
- Q3
- 27.84
- Median
- 7.16
- Q1
- 2.12
- Min
- -14.08
TEM has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -14.08. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.
Financial Strength at a Glance
Symbol | FMS | TEM |
---|---|---|
Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.44 | 1.54 |
Quick Ratio (MRQ) | 1.08 | 1.34 |
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) | 0.83 | 2.58 |
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 5.73 | -14.08 |
Growth
Revenue Growth
EPS Growth
Dividend
Dividend Yield (TTM)
FMS
3.19%
Health Care Providers & Services Industry
- Max
- 5.93%
- Q3
- 2.59%
- Median
- 1.35%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
With a Dividend Yield of 3.19%, FMS offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Health Care Providers & Services industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.
TEM
0.00%
Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry
- Max
- 1.41%
- Q3
- 0.65%
- Median
- 0.35%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
TEM currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
FMS
187.56%
Health Care Providers & Services Industry
- Max
- 185.33%
- Q3
- 74.82%
- Median
- 36.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
At 187.56%, FMS’s Dividend Payout Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. While this provides a significant return to shareholders, it may limit funds for reinvestment and could be difficult to sustain.
TEM
0.00%
Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry
- Max
- 113.14%
- Q3
- 61.34%
- Median
- 17.74%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
TEM has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.
Dividend at a Glance
Symbol | FMS | TEM |
---|---|---|
Dividend Yield (TTM) | 3.19% | 0.00% |
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 187.56% | 0.00% |
Valuation
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)
FMS
20.17
Health Care Providers & Services Industry
- Max
- 40.02
- Q3
- 29.75
- Median
- 21.09
- Q1
- 14.18
- Min
- 7.05
FMS’s P/E Ratio of 20.17 is within the middle range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.
TEM
--
Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry
- Max
- 75.35
- Q3
- 51.00
- Median
- 32.93
- Q1
- 25.27
- Min
- 1.43
P/E Ratio data for TEM is currently unavailable.
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)
FMS
0.68
Health Care Providers & Services Industry
- Max
- 3.15
- Q3
- 1.87
- Median
- 0.74
- Q1
- 0.27
- Min
- 0.09
FMS’s P/S Ratio of 0.68 aligns with the market consensus for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.
TEM
16.99
Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry
- Max
- 10.49
- Q3
- 6.43
- Median
- 4.66
- Q1
- 2.88
- Min
- 1.08
With a P/S Ratio of 16.99, TEM trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)
FMS
1.07
Health Care Providers & Services Industry
- Max
- 7.33
- Q3
- 4.45
- Median
- 2.52
- Q1
- 1.15
- Min
- 0.66
FMS’s P/B Ratio of 1.07 is in the lower quartile for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.
TEM
35.53
Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry
- Max
- 6.69
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.46
- Q1
- 2.38
- Min
- 0.93
At 35.53, TEM’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.
Valuation at a Glance
Symbol | FMS | TEM |
---|---|---|
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) | 20.17 | -- |
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) | 0.68 | 16.99 |
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) | 1.07 | 35.53 |
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM) | 6.57 | -- |