Seek Returns logo

FMS vs. TAK: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at FMS and TAK, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Both FMS and TAK are American Depositary Receipts (ADRs). This provides U.S. investors with straightforward access to investing in these foreign-listed companies.

SymbolFMSTAK
Company NameFresenius Medical Care AGTakeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited
CountryGermanyJapan
GICS SectorHealth CareHealth Care
GICS IndustryHealth Care Providers & ServicesPharmaceuticals
Market Capitalization15.74 billion USD46.64 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateSeptember 17, 1996January 5, 2010
Security TypeADRADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FMS and TAK by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FMS vs. TAK: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFMSTAK
5-Day Price Return4.17%-0.51%
13-Week Price Return-4.77%-3.10%
26-Week Price Return-0.85%-6.75%
52-Week Price Return20.38%5.51%
Month-to-Date Return1.86%-1.32%
Year-to-Date Return3.01%1.84%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.57M5.21M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.54M4.30M
3-Month Volatility21.87%18.77%
Beta0.590.38

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FMS

4.70%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
24.86%
Q3
15.79%
Median
8.56%
Q1
5.75%
Min
-1.64%

FMS’s Return on Equity of 4.70% is in the lower quartile for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

TAK

1.95%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
38.59%
Q3
19.84%
Median
11.85%
Q1
5.40%
Min
-10.91%

TAK’s Return on Equity of 1.95% is in the lower quartile for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

FMS vs. TAK: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FMS

3.36%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
11.56%
Q3
5.45%
Median
2.83%
Q1
1.13%
Min
-1.71%

FMS’s Net Profit Margin of 3.36% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

TAK

3.06%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
40.67%
Q3
19.07%
Median
12.31%
Q1
4.50%
Min
-9.91%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Pharmaceuticals industry, TAK’s Net Profit Margin of 3.06% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

FMS vs. TAK: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FMS

7.57%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
19.08%
Q3
9.66%
Median
4.77%
Q1
2.46%
Min
-0.83%

FMS’s Operating Profit Margin of 7.57% is around the midpoint for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

TAK

8.05%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
45.78%
Q3
23.14%
Median
16.68%
Q1
7.98%
Min
-7.13%

TAK’s Operating Profit Margin of 8.05% is around the midpoint for the Pharmaceuticals industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

FMS vs. TAK: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFMSTAK
Return on Equity (TTM)4.70%1.95%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.02%0.95%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)3.36%3.06%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)7.57%8.05%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)24.67%64.78%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FMS

1.44

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
2.00
Q3
1.51
Median
1.29
Q1
0.92
Min
0.14

FMS’s Current Ratio of 1.44 aligns with the median group of the Health Care Providers & Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

TAK

1.16

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
4.65
Q3
2.64
Median
1.85
Q1
1.26
Min
0.78

TAK’s Current Ratio of 1.16 falls into the lower quartile for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

FMS vs. TAK: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FMS

0.83

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
2.29
Q3
1.24
Median
0.74
Q1
0.50
Min
0.00

FMS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.83 is typical for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

TAK

0.66

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
1.75
Q3
0.82
Median
0.35
Q1
0.13
Min
0.00

TAK’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.66 is typical for the Pharmaceuticals industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

FMS vs. TAK: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FMS

5.73

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
14.47
Q3
7.50
Median
4.52
Q1
2.12
Min
-4.44

FMS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.73 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

TAK

1.96

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
103.95
Q3
43.60
Median
9.83
Q1
2.37
Min
-42.71

In the lower quartile for the Pharmaceuticals industry, TAK’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.96 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

FMS vs. TAK: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFMSTAK
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.441.16
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.080.59
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.830.66
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)5.731.96

Growth

Revenue Growth

FMS vs. TAK: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FMS vs. TAK: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FMS

3.20%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
5.93%
Q3
2.59%
Median
1.35%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 3.20%, FMS offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Health Care Providers & Services industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

TAK

4.55%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
7.14%
Q3
3.45%
Median
2.17%
Q1
0.33%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 4.55%, TAK offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Pharmaceuticals industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

FMS vs. TAK: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FMS

187.56%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
185.33%
Q3
74.82%
Median
36.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

At 187.56%, FMS’s Dividend Payout Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. While this provides a significant return to shareholders, it may limit funds for reinvestment and could be difficult to sustain.

TAK

124.94%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
199.58%
Q3
97.17%
Median
53.47%
Q1
22.97%
Min
0.00%

TAK’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 124.94% is in the upper quartile for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

FMS vs. TAK: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFMSTAK
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.20%4.55%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)187.56%124.94%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FMS

20.14

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
40.02
Q3
29.75
Median
21.09
Q1
14.18
Min
7.05

FMS’s P/E Ratio of 20.14 is within the middle range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

TAK

49.74

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
45.19
Q3
27.91
Median
20.59
Q1
15.08
Min
3.79

At 49.74, TAK’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

FMS vs. TAK: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FMS

0.68

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
3.15
Q3
1.87
Median
0.74
Q1
0.27
Min
0.09

FMS’s P/S Ratio of 0.68 aligns with the market consensus for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

TAK

1.52

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
8.87
Q3
4.56
Median
2.14
Q1
1.58
Min
0.11

In the lower quartile for the Pharmaceuticals industry, TAK’s P/S Ratio of 1.52 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

FMS vs. TAK: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FMS

1.07

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
7.33
Q3
4.45
Median
2.52
Q1
1.15
Min
0.66

FMS’s P/B Ratio of 1.07 is in the lower quartile for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

TAK

1.03

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
9.78
Q3
4.99
Median
2.48
Q1
1.53
Min
0.59

TAK’s P/B Ratio of 1.03 is in the lower quartile for the Pharmaceuticals industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

FMS vs. TAK: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFMSTAK
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)20.1449.74
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.681.52
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.071.03
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)6.568.33