Seek Returns logo

FMS vs. NTRA: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at FMS and NTRA, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

FMS trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, NTRA is a standard domestic listing.

SymbolFMSNTRA
Company NameFresenius Medical Care AGNatera, Inc.
CountryGermanyUnited States
GICS SectorHealth CareHealth Care
GICS IndustryHealth Care Providers & ServicesBiotechnology
Market Capitalization14.81 billion USD22.05 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateSeptember 17, 1996July 1, 2015
Security TypeADRCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FMS and NTRA by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FMS vs. NTRA: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFMSNTRA
5-Day Price Return1.10%1.39%
13-Week Price Return-19.55%4.81%
26-Week Price Return-3.46%-5.91%
52-Week Price Return26.43%29.78%
Month-to-Date Return-3.30%20.19%
Year-to-Date Return-2.60%1.48%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.57M1.82M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.54M1.34M
3-Month Volatility21.47%36.23%
Beta0.611.76

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FMS

4.70%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
26.03%
Q3
13.74%
Median
8.26%
Q1
4.13%
Min
-3.62%

FMS’s Return on Equity of 4.70% is on par with the norm for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

NTRA

-22.21%

Biotechnology Industry

Max
77.14%
Q3
10.76%
Median
-20.08%
Q1
-42.71%
Min
-119.20%

NTRA has a negative Return on Equity of -22.21%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

FMS vs. NTRA: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Biotechnology industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FMS

3.36%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
12.40%
Q3
5.93%
Median
1.96%
Q1
0.93%
Min
-6.10%

FMS’s Net Profit Margin of 3.36% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

NTRA

-12.89%

Biotechnology Industry

Max
59.44%
Q3
16.21%
Median
-11.49%
Q1
-167.42%
Min
-409.07%

NTRA has a negative Net Profit Margin of -12.89%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

FMS vs. NTRA: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Biotechnology industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FMS

7.57%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
19.05%
Q3
10.21%
Median
4.22%
Q1
1.98%
Min
-4.27%

FMS’s Operating Profit Margin of 7.57% is around the midpoint for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

NTRA

-14.95%

Biotechnology Industry

Max
60.62%
Q3
20.76%
Median
-12.41%
Q1
-181.14%
Min
-482.02%

NTRA has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -14.95%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

FMS vs. NTRA: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Biotechnology industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFMSNTRA
Return on Equity (TTM)4.70%-22.21%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.02%-15.03%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)3.36%-12.89%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)7.57%-14.95%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)24.67%62.86%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FMS

1.44

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
2.01
Q3
1.49
Median
1.30
Q1
0.94
Min
0.17

FMS’s Current Ratio of 1.44 aligns with the median group of the Health Care Providers & Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

NTRA

3.72

Biotechnology Industry

Max
19.31
Q3
9.38
Median
4.54
Q1
2.45
Min
0.76

NTRA’s Current Ratio of 3.72 aligns with the median group of the Biotechnology industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

FMS vs. NTRA: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Biotechnology industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FMS

0.83

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
2.17
Q3
1.18
Median
0.74
Q1
0.45
Min
0.00

FMS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.83 is typical for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

NTRA

0.06

Biotechnology Industry

Max
1.35
Q3
0.64
Median
0.09
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

NTRA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.06 is typical for the Biotechnology industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

FMS vs. NTRA: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Biotechnology industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FMS

5.73

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
14.47
Q3
7.15
Median
5.45
Q1
2.04
Min
-4.44

FMS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.73 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

NTRA

-57.80

Biotechnology Industry

Max
72.37
Q3
1.91
Median
-7.81
Q1
-63.90
Min
-153.80

NTRA has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -57.80. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

FMS vs. NTRA: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Biotechnology industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFMSNTRA
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.443.72
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.083.44
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.830.06
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)5.73-57.80

Growth

Revenue Growth

FMS vs. NTRA: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FMS vs. NTRA: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FMS

3.35%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
5.38%
Q3
2.22%
Median
0.55%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 3.35%, FMS offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Health Care Providers & Services industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

NTRA

0.00%

Biotechnology Industry

Max
0.00%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

NTRA currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

FMS vs. NTRA: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Biotechnology industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FMS

187.56%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
186.69%
Q3
74.82%
Median
26.76%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

At 187.56%, FMS’s Dividend Payout Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. While this provides a significant return to shareholders, it may limit funds for reinvestment and could be difficult to sustain.

NTRA

0.00%

Biotechnology Industry

Max
0.00%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

NTRA has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

FMS vs. NTRA: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Biotechnology industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFMSNTRA
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.35%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)187.56%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FMS

19.23

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
55.89
Q3
30.85
Median
21.17
Q1
12.63
Min
0.00

FMS’s P/E Ratio of 19.23 is within the middle range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

NTRA

--

Biotechnology Industry

Max
60.14
Q3
38.17
Median
29.01
Q1
15.12
Min
0.00

P/E Ratio data for NTRA is currently unavailable.

FMS vs. NTRA: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Biotechnology industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FMS

0.65

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
3.10
Q3
1.74
Median
0.67
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

FMS’s P/S Ratio of 0.65 aligns with the market consensus for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

NTRA

11.15

Biotechnology Industry

Max
76.98
Q3
36.53
Median
9.49
Q1
4.49
Min
0.00

NTRA’s P/S Ratio of 11.15 aligns with the market consensus for the Biotechnology industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

FMS vs. NTRA: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Biotechnology industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FMS

1.07

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
7.61
Q3
4.32
Median
2.53
Q1
1.14
Min
0.77

FMS’s P/B Ratio of 1.07 is in the lower quartile for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

NTRA

18.51

Biotechnology Industry

Max
20.53
Q3
9.76
Median
4.77
Q1
2.49
Min
0.59

NTRA’s P/B Ratio of 18.51 is in the upper tier for the Biotechnology industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

FMS vs. NTRA: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Biotechnology industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFMSNTRA
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)19.23--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.6511.15
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.0718.51
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)6.26209.51