Seek Returns logo

FMS vs. MTD: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at FMS and MTD, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

FMS trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, MTD is a standard domestic listing.

SymbolFMSMTD
Company NameFresenius Medical Care AGMettler-Toledo International Inc.
CountryGermanyUnited States
GICS SectorHealth CareHealth Care
GICS IndustryHealth Care Providers & ServicesLife Sciences Tools & Services
Market Capitalization14.58 billion USD27.27 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateSeptember 17, 1996November 14, 1997
Security TypeADRCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FMS and MTD by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FMS vs. MTD: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFMSMTD
5-Day Price Return2.02%7.04%
13-Week Price Return-17.32%12.73%
26-Week Price Return-11.70%-2.45%
52-Week Price Return20.91%-3.92%
Month-to-Date Return-7.06%7.33%
Year-to-Date Return-6.39%8.20%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.64M0.19M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.56M0.20M
3-Month Volatility22.56%35.01%
Beta0.601.41

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FMS

4.70%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
26.03%
Q3
13.74%
Median
8.26%
Q1
4.13%
Min
-3.62%

FMS’s Return on Equity of 4.70% is on par with the norm for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

MTD

1,675.84%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
19.96%
Q3
11.55%
Median
6.22%
Q1
3.86%
Min
-6.95%

MTD’s Return on Equity of 1,675.84% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

FMS vs. MTD: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FMS

3.36%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
12.40%
Q3
5.93%
Median
1.96%
Q1
0.93%
Min
-6.10%

FMS’s Net Profit Margin of 3.36% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

MTD

21.46%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
27.28%
Q3
16.17%
Median
7.24%
Q1
3.00%
Min
-3.05%

A Net Profit Margin of 21.46% places MTD in the upper quartile for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

FMS vs. MTD: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FMS

7.57%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
19.05%
Q3
10.21%
Median
4.22%
Q1
1.98%
Min
-4.27%

FMS’s Operating Profit Margin of 7.57% is around the midpoint for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

MTD

26.49%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
33.15%
Q3
19.34%
Median
13.02%
Q1
8.05%
Min
-4.38%

An Operating Profit Margin of 26.49% places MTD in the upper quartile for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

FMS vs. MTD: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFMSMTD
Return on Equity (TTM)4.70%1,675.84%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.02%25.15%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)3.36%21.46%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)7.57%26.49%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)24.67%59.94%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FMS

1.44

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
2.01
Q3
1.49
Median
1.30
Q1
0.94
Min
0.17

FMS’s Current Ratio of 1.44 aligns with the median group of the Health Care Providers & Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

MTD

1.12

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
4.76
Q3
2.77
Median
1.85
Q1
1.40
Min
0.43

MTD’s Current Ratio of 1.12 falls into the lower quartile for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

FMS vs. MTD: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FMS

0.83

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
2.17
Q3
1.18
Median
0.74
Q1
0.45
Min
0.00

FMS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.83 is typical for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

MTD

81.23

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
1.75
Q3
0.83
Median
0.41
Q1
0.18
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 81.23, MTD operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

FMS vs. MTD: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FMS

5.73

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
14.47
Q3
7.15
Median
5.45
Q1
2.04
Min
-4.44

FMS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.73 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

MTD

15.60

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
29.61
Q3
23.24
Median
6.07
Q1
2.18
Min
-14.08

MTD’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 15.60 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

FMS vs. MTD: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFMSMTD
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.441.12
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.080.67
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.8381.23
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)5.7315.60

Growth

Revenue Growth

FMS vs. MTD: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FMS vs. MTD: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FMS

3.48%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
5.38%
Q3
2.22%
Median
0.55%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 3.48%, FMS offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Health Care Providers & Services industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

MTD

0.00%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
1.80%
Q3
0.78%
Median
0.37%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MTD currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

FMS vs. MTD: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FMS

187.56%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
186.69%
Q3
74.82%
Median
26.76%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

At 187.56%, FMS’s Dividend Payout Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. While this provides a significant return to shareholders, it may limit funds for reinvestment and could be difficult to sustain.

MTD

0.00%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
156.00%
Q3
65.73%
Median
23.81%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MTD has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

FMS vs. MTD: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFMSMTD
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.48%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)187.56%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FMS

18.48

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
55.89
Q3
30.85
Median
21.17
Q1
12.63
Min
0.00

FMS’s P/E Ratio of 18.48 is within the middle range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

MTD

32.63

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
117.96
Q3
65.59
Median
37.26
Q1
27.51
Min
1.73

MTD’s P/E Ratio of 32.63 is within the middle range for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

FMS vs. MTD: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FMS

0.62

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
3.10
Q3
1.74
Median
0.67
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

FMS’s P/S Ratio of 0.62 aligns with the market consensus for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

MTD

7.00

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
12.46
Q3
6.70
Median
4.24
Q1
2.68
Min
0.73

MTD’s P/S Ratio of 7.00 is in the upper echelon for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

FMS vs. MTD: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FMS

1.07

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
7.61
Q3
4.32
Median
2.53
Q1
1.14
Min
0.77

FMS’s P/B Ratio of 1.07 is in the lower quartile for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

MTD

1,299.40

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
7.99
Q3
4.69
Median
3.30
Q1
1.88
Min
1.02

At 1,299.40, MTD’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

FMS vs. MTD: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFMSMTD
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)18.4832.63
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.627.00
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.071,299.40
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)6.0231.94