Seek Returns logo

FMS vs. MDT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at FMS and MDT, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

FMS trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, MDT is a standard domestic listing.

SymbolFMSMDT
Company NameFresenius Medical Care AGMedtronic plc
CountryGermanyIreland
GICS SectorHealth CareHealth Care
GICS IndustryHealth Care Providers & ServicesHealth Care Equipment & Supplies
Market Capitalization15.74 billion USD125.32 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateSeptember 17, 1996May 2, 1973
Security TypeADRCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FMS and MDT by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FMS vs. MDT: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFMSMDT
5-Day Price Return4.17%3.97%
13-Week Price Return-4.77%10.53%
26-Week Price Return-0.85%8.72%
52-Week Price Return20.38%9.63%
Month-to-Date Return1.86%2.58%
Year-to-Date Return3.01%22.31%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.57M7.63M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.54M7.60M
3-Month Volatility21.87%18.03%
Beta0.590.75

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FMS

4.70%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
24.86%
Q3
15.79%
Median
8.56%
Q1
5.75%
Min
-1.64%

FMS’s Return on Equity of 4.70% is in the lower quartile for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

MDT

9.62%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
29.93%
Q3
16.99%
Median
9.28%
Q1
5.10%
Min
-12.52%

MDT’s Return on Equity of 9.62% is on par with the norm for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

FMS vs. MDT: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FMS

3.36%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
11.56%
Q3
5.45%
Median
2.83%
Q1
1.13%
Min
-1.71%

FMS’s Net Profit Margin of 3.36% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

MDT

13.63%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
24.41%
Q3
13.71%
Median
10.08%
Q1
5.96%
Min
-5.58%

MDT’s Net Profit Margin of 13.63% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

FMS vs. MDT: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FMS

7.57%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
19.08%
Q3
9.66%
Median
4.77%
Q1
2.46%
Min
-0.83%

FMS’s Operating Profit Margin of 7.57% is around the midpoint for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

MDT

17.90%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
31.09%
Q3
18.11%
Median
15.07%
Q1
8.48%
Min
-0.28%

MDT’s Operating Profit Margin of 17.90% is around the midpoint for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

FMS vs. MDT: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFMSMDT
Return on Equity (TTM)4.70%9.62%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.02%5.14%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)3.36%13.63%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)7.57%17.90%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)24.67%65.38%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FMS

1.44

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
2.00
Q3
1.51
Median
1.29
Q1
0.92
Min
0.14

FMS’s Current Ratio of 1.44 aligns with the median group of the Health Care Providers & Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

MDT

2.01

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
5.19
Q3
3.00
Median
2.13
Q1
1.44
Min
0.86

MDT’s Current Ratio of 2.01 aligns with the median group of the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

FMS vs. MDT: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FMS

0.83

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
2.29
Q3
1.24
Median
0.74
Q1
0.50
Min
0.00

FMS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.83 is typical for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

MDT

0.60

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
1.61
Q3
0.76
Median
0.45
Q1
0.14
Min
0.00

MDT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.60 is typical for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

FMS vs. MDT: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FMS

5.73

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
14.47
Q3
7.50
Median
4.52
Q1
2.12
Min
-4.44

FMS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.73 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

MDT

10.20

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
56.35
Q3
25.56
Median
9.60
Q1
3.78
Min
-26.49

MDT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 10.20 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

FMS vs. MDT: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFMSMDT
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.442.01
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.081.50
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.830.60
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)5.7310.20

Growth

Revenue Growth

FMS vs. MDT: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FMS vs. MDT: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FMS

3.20%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
5.93%
Q3
2.59%
Median
1.35%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 3.20%, FMS offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Health Care Providers & Services industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

MDT

2.89%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
4.15%
Q3
1.76%
Median
0.79%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 2.89%, MDT offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

FMS vs. MDT: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FMS

187.56%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
185.33%
Q3
74.82%
Median
36.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

At 187.56%, FMS’s Dividend Payout Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. While this provides a significant return to shareholders, it may limit funds for reinvestment and could be difficult to sustain.

MDT

77.27%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
160.00%
Q3
66.60%
Median
27.49%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MDT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 77.27% is in the upper quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

FMS vs. MDT: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFMSMDT
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.20%2.89%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)187.56%77.27%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FMS

20.14

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
40.02
Q3
29.75
Median
21.09
Q1
14.18
Min
7.05

FMS’s P/E Ratio of 20.14 is within the middle range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

MDT

26.71

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
67.29
Q3
47.01
Median
30.94
Q1
23.91
Min
10.79

MDT’s P/E Ratio of 26.71 is within the middle range for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

FMS vs. MDT: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FMS

0.68

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
3.15
Q3
1.87
Median
0.74
Q1
0.27
Min
0.09

FMS’s P/S Ratio of 0.68 aligns with the market consensus for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

MDT

3.64

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
9.49
Q3
5.41
Median
2.86
Q1
2.07
Min
0.74

MDT’s P/S Ratio of 3.64 aligns with the market consensus for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

FMS vs. MDT: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FMS

1.07

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
7.33
Q3
4.45
Median
2.52
Q1
1.15
Min
0.66

FMS’s P/B Ratio of 1.07 is in the lower quartile for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

MDT

2.49

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
10.85
Q3
6.56
Median
3.53
Q1
2.36
Min
0.71

MDT’s P/B Ratio of 2.49 is within the conventional range for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

FMS vs. MDT: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFMSMDT
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)20.1426.71
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.683.64
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.072.49
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)6.5623.47