Seek Returns logo

FMS vs. HLN: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at FMS and HLN, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Both FMS and HLN are American Depositary Receipts (ADRs). This provides U.S. investors with straightforward access to investing in these foreign-listed companies.

SymbolFMSHLN
Company NameFresenius Medical Care AGHaleon plc
CountryGermanyUnited Kingdom
GICS SectorHealth CareConsumer Staples
GICS IndustryHealth Care Providers & ServicesPersonal Care Products
Market Capitalization14.81 billion USD44.59 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateSeptember 17, 1996July 25, 2022
Security TypeADRADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FMS and HLN by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FMS vs. HLN: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFMSHLN
5-Day Price Return1.10%0.47%
13-Week Price Return-19.55%-11.81%
26-Week Price Return-3.46%-7.82%
52-Week Price Return26.43%-3.01%
Month-to-Date Return-3.30%0.33%
Year-to-Date Return-2.60%-4.43%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.57M13.07M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.54M17.31M
3-Month Volatility21.47%15.67%
Beta0.610.38

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FMS

4.70%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
26.03%
Q3
13.74%
Median
8.26%
Q1
4.13%
Min
-3.62%

FMS’s Return on Equity of 4.70% is on par with the norm for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

HLN

3.26%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
31.59%
Q3
20.42%
Median
11.01%
Q1
3.26%
Min
-18.42%

HLN’s Return on Equity of 3.26% is on par with the norm for the Personal Care Products industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

FMS vs. HLN: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FMS

3.36%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
12.40%
Q3
5.93%
Median
1.96%
Q1
0.93%
Min
-6.10%

FMS’s Net Profit Margin of 3.36% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

HLN

12.84%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
15.12%
Q3
12.06%
Median
9.26%
Q1
5.50%
Min
-0.40%

A Net Profit Margin of 12.84% places HLN in the upper quartile for the Personal Care Products industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

FMS vs. HLN: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FMS

7.57%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
19.05%
Q3
10.21%
Median
4.22%
Q1
1.98%
Min
-4.27%

FMS’s Operating Profit Margin of 7.57% is around the midpoint for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

HLN

19.64%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
19.80%
Q3
17.96%
Median
13.14%
Q1
7.58%
Min
-4.25%

An Operating Profit Margin of 19.64% places HLN in the upper quartile for the Personal Care Products industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

FMS vs. HLN: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFMSHLN
Return on Equity (TTM)4.70%3.26%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.02%1.58%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)3.36%12.84%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)7.57%19.64%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)24.67%60.75%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FMS

1.44

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
2.01
Q3
1.49
Median
1.30
Q1
0.94
Min
0.17

FMS’s Current Ratio of 1.44 aligns with the median group of the Health Care Providers & Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

HLN

0.87

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
4.26
Q3
2.61
Median
1.74
Q1
1.13
Min
0.76

HLN’s Current Ratio of 0.87 falls into the lower quartile for the Personal Care Products industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

FMS vs. HLN: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FMS

0.83

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
2.17
Q3
1.18
Median
0.74
Q1
0.45
Min
0.00

FMS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.83 is typical for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

HLN

0.53

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
1.13
Q3
0.63
Median
0.26
Q1
0.04
Min
0.00

HLN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.53 is typical for the Personal Care Products industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

FMS vs. HLN: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FMS

5.73

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
14.47
Q3
7.15
Median
5.45
Q1
2.04
Min
-4.44

FMS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.73 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

HLN

8.00

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
96.53
Q3
59.91
Median
22.25
Q1
7.85
Min
-1.93

HLN’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 8.00 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Personal Care Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

FMS vs. HLN: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFMSHLN
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.440.87
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.080.63
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.830.53
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)5.738.00

Growth

Revenue Growth

FMS vs. HLN: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FMS vs. HLN: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FMS

3.35%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
5.38%
Q3
2.22%
Median
0.55%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 3.35%, FMS offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Health Care Providers & Services industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

HLN

0.72%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
4.08%
Q3
2.46%
Median
1.82%
Q1
0.83%
Min
0.00%

HLN’s Dividend Yield of 0.72% is in the lower quartile for the Personal Care Products industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

FMS vs. HLN: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FMS

187.56%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
186.69%
Q3
74.82%
Median
26.76%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

At 187.56%, FMS’s Dividend Payout Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. While this provides a significant return to shareholders, it may limit funds for reinvestment and could be difficult to sustain.

HLN

954.40%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
207.61%
Q3
115.17%
Median
69.37%
Q1
47.71%
Min
0.00%

At 954.40%, HLN’s Dividend Payout Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical range for the Personal Care Products industry. While this provides a significant return to shareholders, it may limit funds for reinvestment and could be difficult to sustain.

FMS vs. HLN: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFMSHLN
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.35%0.72%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)187.56%954.40%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FMS

19.23

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
55.89
Q3
30.85
Median
21.17
Q1
12.63
Min
0.00

FMS’s P/E Ratio of 19.23 is within the middle range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

HLN

22.43

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
55.49
Q3
36.75
Median
26.49
Q1
22.40
Min
11.12

HLN’s P/E Ratio of 22.43 is within the middle range for the Personal Care Products industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

FMS vs. HLN: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FMS

0.65

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
3.10
Q3
1.74
Median
0.67
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

FMS’s P/S Ratio of 0.65 aligns with the market consensus for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

HLN

2.88

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
5.35
Q3
2.83
Median
2.07
Q1
1.13
Min
0.00

HLN’s P/S Ratio of 2.88 is in the upper echelon for the Personal Care Products industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

FMS vs. HLN: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FMS

1.07

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
7.61
Q3
4.32
Median
2.53
Q1
1.14
Min
0.77

FMS’s P/B Ratio of 1.07 is in the lower quartile for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

HLN

2.11

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
7.32
Q3
5.26
Median
2.93
Q1
1.84
Min
1.14

HLN’s P/B Ratio of 2.11 is within the conventional range for the Personal Care Products industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

FMS vs. HLN: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFMSHLN
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)19.2322.43
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.652.88
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.072.11
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)6.2615.04