Seek Returns logo

FLUT vs. XPEV: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at FLUT and XPEV, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

FLUT is a standard domestic listing, while XPEV trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolFLUTXPEV
Company NameFlutter Entertainment plcXPeng Inc.
CountryUnited StatesChina
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryHotels, Restaurants & LeisureAutomobiles
Market Capitalization51.64 billion USD19.36 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateOctober 4, 2002August 27, 2020
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FLUT and XPEV by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FLUT vs. XPEV: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFLUTXPEV
5-Day Price Return-4.04%2.80%
13-Week Price Return18.80%-4.50%
26-Week Price Return10.37%17.95%
52-Week Price Return55.99%204.22%
Month-to-Date Return-2.83%10.76%
Year-to-Date Return13.65%70.64%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.66M7.02M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.55M7.75M
3-Month Volatility32.59%54.22%
Beta1.172.54

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FLUT

5.32%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
83.01%
Q3
39.51%
Median
17.38%
Q1
5.32%
Min
-45.92%

FLUT’s Return on Equity of 5.32% is on par with the norm for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

XPEV

-15.89%

Automobiles Industry

Max
25.70%
Q3
12.88%
Median
6.92%
Q1
0.71%
Min
-15.89%

XPEV has a negative Return on Equity of -15.89%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

FLUT vs. XPEV: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FLUT

3.65%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
26.45%
Q3
14.67%
Median
8.69%
Q1
3.34%
Min
-11.30%

FLUT’s Net Profit Margin of 3.65% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

XPEV

-10.15%

Automobiles Industry

Max
9.92%
Q3
5.78%
Median
3.23%
Q1
0.11%
Min
-5.31%

XPEV has a negative Net Profit Margin of -10.15%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

FLUT vs. XPEV: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FLUT

6.71%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
38.76%
Q3
21.15%
Median
14.20%
Q1
6.43%
Min
-14.56%

FLUT’s Operating Profit Margin of 6.71% is around the midpoint for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

XPEV

-12.08%

Automobiles Industry

Max
13.07%
Q3
7.22%
Median
5.29%
Q1
0.43%
Min
-4.46%

XPEV has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -12.08%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

FLUT vs. XPEV: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFLUTXPEV
Return on Equity (TTM)5.32%-15.89%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.11%-6.30%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)3.65%-10.15%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)6.71%-12.08%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)47.55%16.38%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FLUT

0.95

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
2.68
Q3
1.62
Median
1.11
Q1
0.74
Min
0.19

FLUT’s Current Ratio of 0.95 aligns with the median group of the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

XPEV

1.21

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.19
Q3
1.54
Median
1.26
Q1
1.09
Min
0.48

XPEV’s Current Ratio of 1.21 aligns with the median group of the Automobiles industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

FLUT vs. XPEV: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FLUT

0.69

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
9.88
Q3
4.54
Median
1.52
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

FLUT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.69 is typical for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

XPEV

0.42

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.34
Q3
1.13
Median
0.58
Q1
0.28
Min
0.06

XPEV’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.42 is typical for the Automobiles industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

FLUT vs. XPEV: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FLUT

1.02

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
26.88
Q3
11.95
Median
3.87
Q1
1.19
Min
-11.84

In the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, FLUT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.02 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

XPEV

-19.31

Automobiles Industry

Max
77.87
Q3
42.86
Median
13.88
Q1
2.13
Min
-49.07

XPEV has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -19.31. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

FLUT vs. XPEV: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFLUTXPEV
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.951.21
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.881.00
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.690.42
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)1.02-19.31

Growth

Revenue Growth

FLUT vs. XPEV: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FLUT vs. XPEV: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FLUT

0.00%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
5.88%
Q3
2.37%
Median
0.68%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FLUT currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

XPEV

0.00%

Automobiles Industry

Max
10.71%
Q3
5.39%
Median
3.14%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

XPEV currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

FLUT vs. XPEV: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FLUT

0.00%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
127.31%
Q3
56.79%
Median
19.58%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FLUT has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

XPEV

0.00%

Automobiles Industry

Max
114.43%
Q3
59.30%
Median
37.15%
Q1
16.40%
Min
0.00%

XPEV has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

FLUT vs. XPEV: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFLUTXPEV
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FLUT

99.19

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
59.44
Q3
33.98
Median
22.25
Q1
15.53
Min
7.61

At 99.19, FLUT’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

XPEV

--

Automobiles Industry

Max
27.69
Q3
19.99
Median
9.85
Q1
6.60
Min
4.25

P/E Ratio data for XPEV is currently unavailable.

FLUT vs. XPEV: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FLUT

3.62

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
7.74
Q3
3.88
Median
2.05
Q1
1.19
Min
0.17

FLUT’s P/S Ratio of 3.62 aligns with the market consensus for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

XPEV

2.45

Automobiles Industry

Max
1.52
Q3
0.84
Median
0.41
Q1
0.23
Min
0.08

With a P/S Ratio of 2.45, XPEV trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Automobiles industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

FLUT vs. XPEV: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FLUT

3.98

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
20.90
Q3
9.78
Median
4.29
Q1
2.22
Min
0.47

FLUT’s P/B Ratio of 3.98 is within the conventional range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

XPEV

4.61

Automobiles Industry

Max
4.25
Q3
2.00
Median
0.87
Q1
0.46
Min
0.19

At 4.61, XPEV’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Automobiles industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

FLUT vs. XPEV: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFLUTXPEV
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)99.19--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.622.45
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.984.61
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)61.35--