FLUT vs. VIPS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
Updated onHere’s a clear look at FLUT and VIPS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.
Company Profile
FLUT is a standard domestic listing, while VIPS trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.
| Symbol | FLUT | VIPS |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Flutter Entertainment plc | Vipshop Holdings Limited |
| Country | United States | China |
| GICS Sector | Consumer Discretionary | Consumer Discretionary |
| GICS Industry | Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure | Broadline Retail |
| Market Capitalization | 43.17 billion USD | 10.08 billion USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | October 4, 2002 | March 23, 2012 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | ADR |
Historical Performance
This chart compares the performance of FLUT and VIPS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Historical Performance at a Glance
| Symbol | FLUT | VIPS |
|---|---|---|
| 5-Day Price Return | -1.44% | 0.20% |
| 13-Week Price Return | -14.07% | 35.70% |
| 26-Week Price Return | 13.06% | 37.90% |
| 52-Week Price Return | 4.48% | 18.28% |
| Month-to-Date Return | -3.13% | 4.12% |
| Year-to-Date Return | -4.80% | 51.82% |
| 10-Day Avg. Volume | 3.73M | 2.81M |
| 3-Month Avg. Volume | 2.60M | 2.75M |
| 3-Month Volatility | 35.03% | 29.12% |
| Beta | 1.21 | 0.76 |
Profitability
Return on Equity (TTM)
FLUT
3.70%
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 84.03%
- Q3
- 40.12%
- Median
- 17.38%
- Q1
- 7.45%
- Min
- -33.94%
FLUT’s Return on Equity of 3.70% is in the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.
VIPS
17.61%
Broadline Retail Industry
- Max
- 47.53%
- Q3
- 31.20%
- Median
- 16.63%
- Q1
- 10.81%
- Min
- -7.57%
VIPS’s Return on Equity of 17.61% is on par with the norm for the Broadline Retail industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.
Net Profit Margin (TTM)
FLUT
2.46%
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 25.61%
- Q3
- 14.65%
- Median
- 8.66%
- Q1
- 3.36%
- Min
- -9.83%
Falling into the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, FLUT’s Net Profit Margin of 2.46% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.
VIPS
6.53%
Broadline Retail Industry
- Max
- 24.63%
- Q3
- 12.77%
- Median
- 8.63%
- Q1
- 4.50%
- Min
- -1.62%
VIPS’s Net Profit Margin of 6.53% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)
FLUT
6.53%
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 45.80%
- Q3
- 22.44%
- Median
- 14.98%
- Q1
- 6.59%
- Min
- -15.28%
FLUT’s Operating Profit Margin of 6.53% is in the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.
VIPS
7.65%
Broadline Retail Industry
- Max
- 27.48%
- Q3
- 17.60%
- Median
- 10.82%
- Q1
- 7.76%
- Min
- -6.73%
VIPS’s Operating Profit Margin of 7.65% is in the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.
Profitability at a Glance
| Symbol | FLUT | VIPS |
|---|---|---|
| Return on Equity (TTM) | 3.70% | 17.61% |
| Return on Assets (TTM) | 1.40% | 9.47% |
| Net Profit Margin (TTM) | 2.46% | 6.53% |
| Operating Profit Margin (TTM) | 6.53% | 7.65% |
| Gross Profit Margin (TTM) | 46.94% | 23.33% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
FLUT
0.95
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 2.73
- Q3
- 1.63
- Median
- 1.12
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.18
FLUT’s Current Ratio of 0.95 aligns with the median group of the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.
VIPS
1.26
Broadline Retail Industry
- Max
- 3.54
- Q3
- 2.42
- Median
- 1.38
- Q1
- 1.20
- Min
- 0.69
VIPS’s Current Ratio of 1.26 aligns with the median group of the Broadline Retail industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)
FLUT
0.97
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 11.29
- Q3
- 4.71
- Median
- 1.65
- Q1
- 0.27
- Min
- 0.00
FLUT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.97 is typical for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.
VIPS
0.17
Broadline Retail Industry
- Max
- 2.01
- Q3
- 1.31
- Median
- 0.72
- Q1
- 0.32
- Min
- 0.00
Falling into the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, VIPS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.17 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)
FLUT
1.02
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 21.72
- Q3
- 11.40
- Median
- 4.02
- Q1
- 1.19
- Min
- -11.84
In the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, FLUT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.02 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.
VIPS
150.47
Broadline Retail Industry
- Max
- 37.34
- Q3
- 21.16
- Median
- 8.60
- Q1
- 3.22
- Min
- -19.29
With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 150.47, VIPS demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Broadline Retail industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.
Financial Strength at a Glance
| Symbol | FLUT | VIPS |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 0.95 | 1.26 |
| Quick Ratio (MRQ) | 0.89 | 1.11 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) | 0.97 | 0.17 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 1.02 | 150.47 |
Growth
Revenue Growth
EPS Growth
Dividend
Dividend Yield (TTM)
FLUT
0.00%
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 6.81%
- Q3
- 2.73%
- Median
- 0.74%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
FLUT currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.
VIPS
0.00%
Broadline Retail Industry
- Max
- 4.06%
- Q3
- 2.07%
- Median
- 0.37%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
VIPS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
FLUT
0.00%
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 128.39%
- Q3
- 61.60%
- Median
- 21.91%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
FLUT has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.
VIPS
0.00%
Broadline Retail Industry
- Max
- 114.82%
- Q3
- 62.39%
- Median
- 28.55%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
VIPS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.
Dividend at a Glance
| Symbol | FLUT | VIPS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Valuation
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)
FLUT
117.97
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 56.96
- Q3
- 33.82
- Median
- 21.30
- Q1
- 15.75
- Min
- 6.06
At 117.97, FLUT’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.
VIPS
10.37
Broadline Retail Industry
- Max
- 62.76
- Q3
- 32.50
- Median
- 17.65
- Q1
- 12.08
- Min
- 6.87
In the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, VIPS’s P/E Ratio of 10.37 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)
FLUT
2.90
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 7.19
- Q3
- 3.99
- Median
- 1.93
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- 0.17
FLUT’s P/S Ratio of 2.90 aligns with the market consensus for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.
VIPS
0.68
Broadline Retail Industry
- Max
- 5.19
- Q3
- 3.25
- Median
- 2.13
- Q1
- 1.01
- Min
- 0.21
In the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, VIPS’s P/S Ratio of 0.68 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)
FLUT
4.93
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 24.89
- Q3
- 11.60
- Median
- 4.91
- Q1
- 2.29
- Min
- 0.37
FLUT’s P/B Ratio of 4.93 is within the conventional range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.
VIPS
1.40
Broadline Retail Industry
- Max
- 8.81
- Q3
- 5.19
- Median
- 3.42
- Q1
- 1.75
- Min
- 0.73
VIPS’s P/B Ratio of 1.40 is in the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.
Valuation at a Glance
| Symbol | FLUT | VIPS |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) | 117.97 | 10.37 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) | 2.90 | 0.68 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) | 4.93 | 1.40 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM) | 52.08 | -- |