FLUT vs. VIK: Flutter Entertainment vs. Viking Stock Comparison
How do Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) and Viking (VIK) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) and Viking (VIK) both belong to the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, though FLUT is classified under Casinos & Gaming while VIK falls under Hotels, Resorts & Cruise Lines.
Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) carries decades of public-market history since October 4, 2002, while Viking (VIK) listed on May 1, 2024 — long-window comparisons have far more historical data on the FLUT side.
| Profile Item | FLUT | VIK |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Flutter Entertainment plc | Viking Holdings Ltd. |
| Country/Region | United States | Bermuda |
| GICS Sector | Consumer Discretionary | Consumer Discretionary |
| GICS Industry Group | Consumer Services | Consumer Services |
| GICS Industry | Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure | Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Casinos & Gaming | Hotels, Resorts & Cruise Lines |
| Market Capitalization | 14.21 billion USD | 39.07 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | October 4, 2002 | May 1, 2024 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | FLUT | VIK |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | -62.98% | 49.03% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | -18.39% | -- |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | -13.45% | -- |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | FLUT | VIK |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 49.93% | 41.04% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.12 | 1.38 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -75.94% | -35.39% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 2.85M | 3.95M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | FLUT | VIK |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -1.35 | 1.09 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -1.68 | 1.71 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) reports a negative ROE of -13.47%; negative ROE can reflect losses or negative shareholders’ equity, so it is harder to read as capital efficiency. Meanwhile Viking (VIK) reports 139.62%, ranking against industry peers normally.
FLUT
Consumer Services industry group
-13.47%
- Max
- 76.75%
- Q3
- 34.07%
- Median
- 15.90%
- Q1
- 3.23%
- FLUT
- -13.47%
- Min
- -40.61%
VIK
Consumer Services industry group
139.62%
- VIK
- 139.62%
- Max
- 76.75%
- Q3
- 34.07%
- Median
- 15.90%
- Q1
- 3.23%
- Min
- -40.61%
Net Margin (TTM)
Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) reports a negative net margin of -5.37%, usually indicating a net loss over the period. Meanwhile Viking (VIK) reports 19.33%, ranking against industry peers normally.
FLUT
Consumer Services industry group
-5.37%
- Max
- 25.52%
- Q3
- 12.95%
- Median
- 6.63%
- Q1
- 1.46%
- FLUT
- -5.37%
- Min
- -14.36%
VIK
Consumer Services industry group
19.33%
- Max
- 25.52%
- VIK
- 19.33%
- Q3
- 12.95%
- Median
- 6.63%
- Q1
- 1.46%
- Min
- -14.36%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) reports a negative operating margin of -8.21%, usually indicating that operating costs exceeded revenue at the operating-income line. Meanwhile Viking (VIK) reports 29.40%, ranking against industry peers normally.
FLUT
Consumer Services industry group
-8.21%
- Max
- 49.05%
- Q3
- 24.35%
- Median
- 14.23%
- Q1
- 5.67%
- FLUT
- -8.21%
- Min
- -16.47%
VIK
Consumer Services industry group
29.40%
- Max
- 49.05%
- VIK
- 29.40%
- Q3
- 24.35%
- Median
- 14.23%
- Q1
- 5.67%
- Min
- -16.47%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | FLUT | VIK |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | -13.47% | 139.62% |
| ROA (TTM) | -0.18% | 8.14% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | -5.37% | 19.33% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | -8.21% | 29.40% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 41.63% | 44.28% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) at 16.62% and Viking (VIK) at 21.89% sit in the top peer quartile for revenue growth, so each is growing its top line faster than typical industry peers.
EPS Growth
Viking (VIK) at 613.89% sits above its peer range for EPS growth; Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) at -829.17% sits below its range, putting their earnings trajectories at opposite ends.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | FLUT | VIK |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 16.62% | 21.89% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 20.08% | 26.97% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -829.17% | 613.89% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -- | -- |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) at 0.91 and Viking (VIK) at 0.81 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.
FLUT
Consumer Services industry group
0.91
- Max
- 3.41
- Q3
- 1.85
- Median
- 1.06
- FLUT
- 0.91
- Q1
- 0.72
- Min
- 0.22
VIK
Consumer Services industry group
0.81
- Max
- 3.41
- Q3
- 1.85
- Median
- 1.06
- VIK
- 0.81
- Q1
- 0.72
- Min
- 0.22
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) at 1.56 carries an industry-typical debt-to-equity mix, while Viking (VIK) at 3.75 uses more debt funding than most peers.
FLUT
Consumer Services industry group
1.56
- Max
- 6.12
- Q3
- 2.93
- FLUT
- 1.56
- Median
- 1.29
- Q1
- 0.37
- Min
- 0.01
VIK
Consumer Services industry group
3.75
- Max
- 6.12
- VIK
- 3.75
- Q3
- 2.93
- Median
- 1.29
- Q1
- 0.37
- Min
- 0.01
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | FLUT | VIK |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 0.91 | 0.81 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 1.56 | 3.75 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 7.06 | 1.15 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Neither Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) nor Viking (VIK) pays a dividend this period — they may reinvest, use buybacks, or simply not return cash through dividends.
FLUT
Consumer Services industry group
0.00%
- Max
- 4.10%
- Q3
- 1.82%
- FLUT
- 0.00%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
VIK
Consumer Services industry group
0.00%
- Max
- 4.10%
- Q3
- 1.82%
- VIK
- 0.00%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Neither Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) nor Viking (VIK) pays a dividend this period — they may reinvest, use buybacks, or simply not return cash through dividends.
FLUT
Consumer Services industry group
0.00%
- Max
- 89.80%
- Q3
- 36.83%
- FLUT
- 0.00%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
VIK
Consumer Services industry group
0.00%
- Max
- 89.80%
- Q3
- 36.83%
- VIK
- 0.00%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | FLUT | VIK |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
An earnings multiple is available for just one side: Viking (VIK) trades at 29.06 times trailing earnings, ranked against its peers, while Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) has no P/E ratio this period.
FLUT
Consumer Services industry group
--
- Max
- 71.70
- Q3
- 37.12
- Median
- 21.88
- Q1
- 13.00
- Min
- 5.72
- FLUT
- --
VIK
Consumer Services industry group
29.06
- Max
- 71.70
- Q3
- 37.12
- VIK
- 29.06
- Median
- 21.88
- Q1
- 13.00
- Min
- 5.72
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) at 0.82 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Viking (VIK) at 5.61 sits in the pricier quartile — VIK costs more per dollar of sales.
FLUT
Consumer Services industry group
0.82
- Max
- 6.40
- Q3
- 3.01
- Median
- 1.54
- FLUT
- 0.82
- Q1
- 0.74
- Min
- 0.08
VIK
Consumer Services industry group
5.61
- Max
- 6.40
- VIK
- 5.61
- Q3
- 3.01
- Median
- 1.54
- Q1
- 0.74
- Min
- 0.08
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) at 1.79 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while Viking (VIK) at 24.05 prices above its benchmark range — VIK looks rich relative to book.
FLUT
Consumer Services industry group
1.79
- Max
- 12.02
- Q3
- 5.58
- Median
- 2.37
- FLUT
- 1.79
- Q1
- 1.09
- Min
- -4.51
VIK
Consumer Services industry group
24.05
- VIK
- 24.05
- Max
- 12.02
- Q3
- 5.58
- Median
- 2.37
- Q1
- 1.09
- Min
- -4.51
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | FLUT | VIK |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | -- | 29.06 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 0.82 | 5.61 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 1.79 | 24.05 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | -7.47% | 1.04% |