FLUT vs. TPR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on October 4, 2025

Here’s a clear look at FLUT and TPR, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Symbol	FLUT	TPR
Company Name	Flutter Entertainment plc	Tapestry, Inc.
Country	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Consumer Discretionary	Consumer Discretionary
GICS Industry	Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure	Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods
Market Capitalization	48.96 billion USD	23.56 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	October 4, 2002	October 6, 2000
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FLUT and TPR by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FLUT vs. TPR: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	FLUT	TPR
5-Day Price Return	-9.53%	-0.18%
13-Week Price Return	-11.36%	28.94%
26-Week Price Return	6.38%	53.66%
52-Week Price Return	6.38%	136.17%
Month-to-Date Return	-0.62%	11.20%
Year-to-Date Return	-2.33%	73.30%
10-Day Avg. Volume	2.38M	3.40M
3-Month Avg. Volume	2.45M	3.94M
3-Month Volatility	32.47%	44.31%
Beta	1.21	1.76

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FLUT

3.70%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max: 84.03%
Q3: 40.12%
Median: 17.38%
Q1: 7.45%
Min: -33.94%

FLUT’s Return on Equity of 3.70% is in the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

TPR

10.99%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 42.05%
Q3: 24.41%
Median: 17.18%
Q1: 7.87%
Min: -8.23%

TPR’s Return on Equity of 10.99% is on par with the norm for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

FLUT vs. TPR: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FLUT

2.46%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max: 25.61%
Q3: 14.65%
Median: 8.66%
Q1: 3.36%
Min: -9.83%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, FLUT’s Net Profit Margin of 2.46% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

TPR

2.61%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 21.16%
Q3: 13.26%
Median: 6.06%
Q1: 3.93%
Min: -3.05%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, TPR’s Net Profit Margin of 2.61% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

FLUT vs. TPR: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FLUT

6.53%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max: 45.80%
Q3: 22.44%
Median: 14.98%
Q1: 6.59%
Min: -15.28%

FLUT’s Operating Profit Margin of 6.53% is in the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

TPR

4.21%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 29.47%
Q3: 20.87%
Median: 11.68%
Q1: 6.26%
Min: -0.12%

TPR’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.21% is in the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

FLUT vs. TPR: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	FLUT	TPR
Return on Equity (TTM)	3.70%	10.99%
Return on Assets (TTM)	1.40%	2.10%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	2.46%	2.61%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	6.53%	4.21%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	46.94%	75.44%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FLUT

0.95

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max: 2.73
Q3: 1.63
Median: 1.12
Q1: 0.73
Min: 0.18

FLUT’s Current Ratio of 0.95 aligns with the median group of the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

TPR

1.87

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 2.94
Q3: 2.22
Median: 1.61
Q1: 1.48
Min: 0.74

TPR’s Current Ratio of 1.87 aligns with the median group of the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

FLUT vs. TPR: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FLUT

0.97

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max: 11.29
Q3: 4.71
Median: 1.65
Q1: 0.27
Min: 0.00

FLUT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.97 is typical for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

TPR

2.79

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 2.79
Q3: 1.32
Median: 0.60
Q1: 0.27
Min: 0.00

TPR’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.79. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

FLUT vs. TPR: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FLUT

1.02

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max: 21.72
Q3: 11.40
Median: 4.02
Q1: 1.19
Min: -11.84

In the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, FLUT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.02 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

TPR

3.53

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 57.00
Q3: 32.83
Median: 7.87
Q1: 3.52
Min: -32.49

TPR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.53 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

FLUT vs. TPR: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	FLUT	TPR
Current Ratio (MRQ)	0.95	1.87
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	0.89	1.23
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.97	2.79
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	1.02	3.53

Growth

Revenue Growth

FLUT vs. TPR: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FLUT vs. TPR: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FLUT

0.00%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max: 6.81%
Q3: 2.73%
Median: 0.74%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

FLUT currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

TPR

1.27%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 5.22%
Q3: 3.07%
Median: 2.34%
Q1: 1.11%
Min: 0.00%

TPR’s Dividend Yield of 1.27% is consistent with its peers in the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

FLUT vs. TPR: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FLUT

0.00%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max: 128.39%
Q3: 61.60%
Median: 21.91%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

FLUT has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

TPR

35.71%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 156.63%
Q3: 94.60%
Median: 52.65%
Q1: 35.04%
Min: 0.00%

TPR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 35.71% is within the typical range for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

FLUT vs. TPR: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	FLUT	TPR
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.00%	1.27%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	0.00%	35.71%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FLUT

123.10

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max: 56.96
Q3: 33.82
Median: 21.30
Q1: 15.75
Min: 6.06

At 123.10, FLUT’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

TPR

128.26

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 48.15
Q3: 33.82
Median: 20.70
Q1: 14.57
Min: 7.12

At 128.26, TPR’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

FLUT vs. TPR: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FLUT

3.03

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max: 7.19
Q3: 3.99
Median: 1.93
Q1: 1.26
Min: 0.17

FLUT’s P/S Ratio of 3.03 aligns with the market consensus for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

TPR

3.35

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 4.35
Q3: 3.06
Median: 1.66
Q1: 0.83
Min: 0.26

TPR’s P/S Ratio of 3.35 is in the upper echelon for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

FLUT vs. TPR: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FLUT

4.93

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max: 24.89
Q3: 11.60
Median: 4.91
Q1: 2.29
Min: 0.37

FLUT’s P/B Ratio of 4.93 is within the conventional range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

TPR

21.26

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 9.74
Q3: 5.59
Median: 3.41
Q1: 2.01
Min: 0.56

At 21.26, TPR’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

FLUT vs. TPR: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	FLUT	TPR
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	123.10	128.26
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	3.03	3.35
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	4.93	21.26
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	54.35	21.96