Seek Returns logo

FLUT vs. TOL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at FLUT and TOL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolFLUTTOL
Company NameFlutter Entertainment plcToll Brothers, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryHotels, Restaurants & LeisureHousehold Durables
Market Capitalization48.96 billion USD13.49 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateOctober 4, 2002July 8, 1986
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FLUT and TOL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FLUT vs. TOL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFLUTTOL
5-Day Price Return-9.53%0.69%
13-Week Price Return-11.36%21.04%
26-Week Price Return6.38%26.48%
52-Week Price Return6.38%-11.08%
Month-to-Date Return-0.62%-0.62%
Year-to-Date Return-2.33%9.68%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.38M1.46M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.45M1.68M
3-Month Volatility32.47%33.83%
Beta1.211.39

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FLUT

3.70%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
84.03%
Q3
40.12%
Median
17.38%
Q1
7.45%
Min
-33.94%

FLUT’s Return on Equity of 3.70% is in the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

TOL

17.46%

Household Durables Industry

Max
27.70%
Q3
17.40%
Median
12.87%
Q1
7.33%
Min
-5.50%

In the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry, TOL’s Return on Equity of 17.46% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

FLUT vs. TOL: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FLUT

2.46%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
25.61%
Q3
14.65%
Median
8.66%
Q1
3.36%
Min
-9.83%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, FLUT’s Net Profit Margin of 2.46% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

TOL

12.64%

Household Durables Industry

Max
16.37%
Q3
9.18%
Median
6.63%
Q1
3.85%
Min
-3.29%

A Net Profit Margin of 12.64% places TOL in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

FLUT vs. TOL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FLUT

6.53%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
45.80%
Q3
22.44%
Median
14.98%
Q1
6.59%
Min
-15.28%

FLUT’s Operating Profit Margin of 6.53% is in the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

TOL

16.25%

Household Durables Industry

Max
21.32%
Q3
12.25%
Median
9.93%
Q1
5.57%
Min
-1.07%

An Operating Profit Margin of 16.25% places TOL in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

FLUT vs. TOL: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFLUTTOL
Return on Equity (TTM)3.70%17.46%
Return on Assets (TTM)1.40%9.90%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)2.46%12.64%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)6.53%16.25%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)46.94%25.86%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FLUT

0.95

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
2.73
Q3
1.63
Median
1.12
Q1
0.73
Min
0.18

FLUT’s Current Ratio of 0.95 aligns with the median group of the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

TOL

3.57

Household Durables Industry

Max
6.09
Q3
3.79
Median
2.54
Q1
1.23
Min
0.83

TOL’s Current Ratio of 3.57 aligns with the median group of the Household Durables industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

FLUT vs. TOL: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FLUT

0.97

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
11.29
Q3
4.71
Median
1.65
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

FLUT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.97 is typical for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

TOL

0.36

Household Durables Industry

Max
1.89
Q3
0.87
Median
0.34
Q1
0.19
Min
0.00

TOL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.36 is typical for the Household Durables industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

FLUT vs. TOL: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FLUT

1.02

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
21.72
Q3
11.40
Median
4.02
Q1
1.19
Min
-11.84

In the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, FLUT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.02 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

TOL

-8.67

Household Durables Industry

Max
140.40
Q3
77.14
Median
24.53
Q1
5.69
Min
-17.01

TOL has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -8.67. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

FLUT vs. TOL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFLUTTOL
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.953.57
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.890.25
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.970.36
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)1.02-8.67

Growth

Revenue Growth

FLUT vs. TOL: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FLUT vs. TOL: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FLUT

0.00%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
6.81%
Q3
2.73%
Median
0.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FLUT currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

TOL

0.71%

Household Durables Industry

Max
9.61%
Q3
3.97%
Median
2.00%
Q1
0.18%
Min
0.00%

TOL’s Dividend Yield of 0.71% is consistent with its peers in the Household Durables industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

FLUT vs. TOL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FLUT

0.00%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
128.39%
Q3
61.60%
Median
21.91%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FLUT has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

TOL

6.91%

Household Durables Industry

Max
129.55%
Q3
65.55%
Median
42.15%
Q1
6.45%
Min
0.00%

TOL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 6.91% is within the typical range for the Household Durables industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

FLUT vs. TOL: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFLUTTOL
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.71%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%6.91%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FLUT

123.10

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
56.96
Q3
33.82
Median
21.30
Q1
15.75
Min
6.06

At 123.10, FLUT’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

TOL

9.77

Household Durables Industry

Max
33.67
Q3
19.33
Median
12.58
Q1
9.62
Min
6.48

TOL’s P/E Ratio of 9.77 is within the middle range for the Household Durables industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

FLUT vs. TOL: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FLUT

3.03

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
7.19
Q3
3.99
Median
1.93
Q1
1.26
Min
0.17

FLUT’s P/S Ratio of 3.03 aligns with the market consensus for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

TOL

1.24

Household Durables Industry

Max
2.54
Q3
1.39
Median
0.90
Q1
0.54
Min
0.19

TOL’s P/S Ratio of 1.24 aligns with the market consensus for the Household Durables industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

FLUT vs. TOL: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FLUT

4.93

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
24.89
Q3
11.60
Median
4.91
Q1
2.29
Min
0.37

FLUT’s P/B Ratio of 4.93 is within the conventional range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

TOL

1.41

Household Durables Industry

Max
3.26
Q3
2.01
Median
1.38
Q1
1.00
Min
0.58

TOL’s P/B Ratio of 1.41 is within the conventional range for the Household Durables industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

FLUT vs. TOL: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFLUTTOL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)123.109.77
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.031.24
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.931.41
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)54.3511.57