Seek Returns logo

FLUT vs. PKG: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at FLUT and PKG, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolFLUTPKG
Company NameFlutter Entertainment plcPackaging Corporation of America
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryMaterials
GICS IndustryHotels, Restaurants & LeisureContainers & Packaging
Market Capitalization34.06 billion USD17.64 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateOctober 4, 2002January 28, 2000
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FLUT and PKG by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FLUT vs. PKG: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFLUTPKG
5-Day Price Return-17.58%-1.74%
13-Week Price Return-35.00%1.96%
26-Week Price Return-22.95%4.47%
52-Week Price Return-28.42%-17.25%
Month-to-Date Return-17.83%0.75%
Year-to-Date Return-26.06%-12.40%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.91M0.81M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.40M0.74M
3-Month Volatility43.56%24.71%
Beta1.230.92

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FLUT

3.70%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
85.86%
Q3
39.97%
Median
16.82%
Q1
6.71%
Min
-33.94%

FLUT’s Return on Equity of 3.70% is in the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

PKG

19.54%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
33.32%
Q3
19.47%
Median
12.36%
Q1
6.76%
Min
-12.20%

In the upper quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, PKG’s Return on Equity of 19.54% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

FLUT vs. PKG: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FLUT

2.46%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
25.51%
Q3
14.65%
Median
8.65%
Q1
3.34%
Min
-9.83%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, FLUT’s Net Profit Margin of 2.46% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

PKG

10.18%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
11.45%
Q3
8.67%
Median
5.36%
Q1
3.40%
Min
-2.25%

A Net Profit Margin of 10.18% places PKG in the upper quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

FLUT vs. PKG: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FLUT

6.53%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
41.93%
Q3
22.25%
Median
15.03%
Q1
6.66%
Min
-15.28%

FLUT’s Operating Profit Margin of 6.53% is in the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

PKG

14.14%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
22.03%
Q3
12.87%
Median
9.18%
Q1
6.39%
Min
-0.41%

An Operating Profit Margin of 14.14% places PKG in the upper quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

FLUT vs. PKG: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFLUTPKG
Return on Equity (TTM)3.70%19.54%
Return on Assets (TTM)1.40%9.45%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)2.46%10.18%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)6.53%14.14%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)46.94%21.79%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FLUT

0.95

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
2.86
Q3
1.63
Median
1.09
Q1
0.72
Min
0.16

FLUT’s Current Ratio of 0.95 aligns with the median group of the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

PKG

3.16

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
2.11
Q3
1.55
Median
1.33
Q1
1.14
Min
0.87

PKG’s Current Ratio of 3.16 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

FLUT vs. PKG: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FLUT

0.97

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
11.29
Q3
5.00
Median
1.69
Q1
0.28
Min
0.00

FLUT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.97 is typical for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

PKG

0.84

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
3.86
Q3
1.96
Median
1.25
Q1
0.67
Min
0.23

PKG’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.84 is typical for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

FLUT vs. PKG: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FLUT

1.02

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
26.88
Q3
11.95
Median
4.07
Q1
1.21
Min
-11.84

In the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, FLUT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.02 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

PKG

26.71

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
13.16
Q3
8.10
Median
3.38
Q1
2.83
Min
1.06

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 26.71, PKG demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Containers & Packaging industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

FLUT vs. PKG: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFLUTPKG
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.953.16
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.891.93
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.970.84
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)1.0226.71

Growth

Revenue Growth

FLUT vs. PKG: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FLUT vs. PKG: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FLUT

0.00%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
6.26%
Q3
2.86%
Median
1.03%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FLUT currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

PKG

2.53%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
7.42%
Q3
5.04%
Median
3.96%
Q1
2.03%
Min
0.00%

PKG’s Dividend Yield of 2.53% is consistent with its peers in the Containers & Packaging industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

FLUT vs. PKG: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FLUT

0.00%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
149.29%
Q3
62.26%
Median
24.10%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FLUT has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

PKG

50.31%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
222.75%
Q3
132.16%
Median
63.96%
Q1
27.01%
Min
0.00%

PKG’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 50.31% is within the typical range for the Containers & Packaging industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

FLUT vs. PKG: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFLUTPKG
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%2.53%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%50.31%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FLUT

91.97

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
52.15
Q3
31.98
Median
20.63
Q1
14.77
Min
3.30

At 91.97, FLUT’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

PKG

19.86

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
19.86
Q3
18.86
Median
16.72
Q1
13.58
Min
6.36

A P/E Ratio of 19.86 places PKG in the upper quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

FLUT vs. PKG: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FLUT

2.26

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
7.94
Q3
3.96
Median
2.01
Q1
1.22
Min
0.16

FLUT’s P/S Ratio of 2.26 aligns with the market consensus for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

PKG

2.02

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
2.02
Q3
1.14
Median
0.89
Q1
0.55
Min
0.31

PKG’s P/S Ratio of 2.02 is in the upper echelon for the Containers & Packaging industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

FLUT vs. PKG: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FLUT

4.93

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
29.33
Q3
13.12
Median
4.61
Q1
2.02
Min
0.37

FLUT’s P/B Ratio of 4.93 is within the conventional range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

PKG

4.12

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
4.37
Q3
2.85
Median
2.17
Q1
1.46
Min
0.76

PKG’s P/B Ratio of 4.12 is in the upper tier for the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

FLUT vs. PKG: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFLUTPKG
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)91.9719.86
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.262.02
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.934.12
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)40.6024.54