Seek Returns logo

FLUT vs. KMX: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at FLUT and KMX, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolFLUTKMX
Company NameFlutter Entertainment plcCarMax, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryHotels, Restaurants & LeisureSpecialty Retail
Market Capitalization45.08 billion USD6.82 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateOctober 4, 2002February 4, 1997
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FLUT and KMX by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FLUT vs. KMX: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFLUTKMX
5-Day Price Return-9.52%2.59%
13-Week Price Return-8.81%-34.26%
26-Week Price Return15.68%-40.43%
52-Week Price Return10.16%-38.46%
Month-to-Date Return0.91%3.45%
Year-to-Date Return-0.83%-43.22%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.74M7.83M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.48M3.77M
3-Month Volatility32.97%49.20%
Beta1.211.31

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FLUT

3.70%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
84.03%
Q3
40.12%
Median
17.38%
Q1
7.45%
Min
-33.94%

FLUT’s Return on Equity of 3.70% is in the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

KMX

8.36%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
64.63%
Q3
37.13%
Median
19.07%
Q1
10.79%
Min
-16.66%

KMX’s Return on Equity of 8.36% is in the lower quartile for the Specialty Retail industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

FLUT vs. KMX: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FLUT

2.46%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
25.61%
Q3
14.65%
Median
8.66%
Q1
3.36%
Min
-9.83%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, FLUT’s Net Profit Margin of 2.46% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

KMX

1.98%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
21.04%
Q3
10.99%
Median
6.08%
Q1
2.46%
Min
-4.37%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Specialty Retail industry, KMX’s Net Profit Margin of 1.98% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

FLUT vs. KMX: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FLUT

6.53%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
45.80%
Q3
22.44%
Median
14.98%
Q1
6.59%
Min
-15.28%

FLUT’s Operating Profit Margin of 6.53% is in the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

KMX

2.64%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
33.35%
Q3
16.40%
Median
9.28%
Q1
4.05%
Min
-10.63%

KMX’s Operating Profit Margin of 2.64% is in the lower quartile for the Specialty Retail industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

FLUT vs. KMX: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFLUTKMX
Return on Equity (TTM)3.70%8.36%
Return on Assets (TTM)1.40%1.91%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)2.46%1.98%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)6.53%2.64%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)46.94%11.21%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FLUT

0.95

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
2.73
Q3
1.63
Median
1.12
Q1
0.73
Min
0.18

FLUT’s Current Ratio of 0.95 aligns with the median group of the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

KMX

2.46

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
2.72
Q3
1.81
Median
1.38
Q1
1.15
Min
0.52

KMX’s Current Ratio of 2.46 is in the upper quartile for the Specialty Retail industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

FLUT vs. KMX: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FLUT

0.97

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
11.29
Q3
4.71
Median
1.65
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

FLUT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.97 is typical for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

KMX

3.03

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
3.44
Q3
1.57
Median
0.60
Q1
0.22
Min
0.00

KMX’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Specialty Retail industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.03. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

FLUT vs. KMX: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FLUT

1.02

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
21.72
Q3
11.40
Median
4.02
Q1
1.19
Min
-11.84

In the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, FLUT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.02 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

KMX

--

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
48.12
Q3
39.12
Median
14.13
Q1
3.63
Min
-36.00

Interest Coverage Ratio data for KMX is currently unavailable.

FLUT vs. KMX: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFLUTKMX
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.952.46
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.891.06
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.973.03
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)1.02--

Growth

Revenue Growth

FLUT vs. KMX: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FLUT vs. KMX: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FLUT

0.00%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
6.81%
Q3
2.73%
Median
0.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FLUT currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

KMX

0.00%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
6.48%
Q3
2.84%
Median
1.04%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

KMX currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

FLUT vs. KMX: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FLUT

0.00%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
128.39%
Q3
61.60%
Median
21.91%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FLUT has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

KMX

0.00%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
192.64%
Q3
79.43%
Median
26.55%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

KMX has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

FLUT vs. KMX: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFLUTKMX
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FLUT

123.26

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
56.96
Q3
33.82
Median
21.30
Q1
15.75
Min
6.06

At 123.26, FLUT’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

KMX

13.04

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
47.04
Q3
27.74
Median
23.51
Q1
13.77
Min
7.47

In the lower quartile for the Specialty Retail industry, KMX’s P/E Ratio of 13.04 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

FLUT vs. KMX: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FLUT

3.03

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
7.19
Q3
3.99
Median
1.93
Q1
1.26
Min
0.17

FLUT’s P/S Ratio of 3.03 aligns with the market consensus for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

KMX

0.26

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
5.77
Q3
2.79
Median
1.21
Q1
0.53
Min
0.09

In the lower quartile for the Specialty Retail industry, KMX’s P/S Ratio of 0.26 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

FLUT vs. KMX: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FLUT

4.93

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
24.89
Q3
11.60
Median
4.91
Q1
2.29
Min
0.37

FLUT’s P/B Ratio of 4.93 is within the conventional range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

KMX

1.48

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
16.93
Q3
7.92
Median
3.98
Q1
1.86
Min
0.55

KMX’s P/B Ratio of 1.48 is in the lower quartile for the Specialty Retail industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

FLUT vs. KMX: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFLUTKMX
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)123.2613.04
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.030.26
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.931.48
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)54.428.13