FLUT vs. IP: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
Updated onHere’s a clear look at FLUT and IP, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.
Company Profile
| Symbol | FLUT | IP |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Flutter Entertainment plc | International Paper Company |
| Country | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Consumer Discretionary | Materials |
| GICS Industry | Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure | Containers & Packaging |
| Market Capitalization | 45.08 billion USD | 24.90 billion USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | October 4, 2002 | January 2, 1962 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Historical Performance
This chart compares the performance of FLUT and IP by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Historical Performance at a Glance
| Symbol | FLUT | IP |
|---|---|---|
| 5-Day Price Return | -9.52% | 2.37% |
| 13-Week Price Return | -8.81% | -6.46% |
| 26-Week Price Return | 15.68% | -11.58% |
| 52-Week Price Return | 10.16% | -1.95% |
| Month-to-Date Return | 0.91% | 1.66% |
| Year-to-Date Return | -0.83% | -12.36% |
| 10-Day Avg. Volume | 2.74M | 3.09M |
| 3-Month Avg. Volume | 2.48M | 4.09M |
| 3-Month Volatility | 32.97% | 33.98% |
| Beta | 1.21 | 1.13 |
Profitability
Return on Equity (TTM)
FLUT
3.70%
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 84.03%
- Q3
- 40.12%
- Median
- 17.38%
- Q1
- 7.45%
- Min
- -33.94%
FLUT’s Return on Equity of 3.70% is in the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.
IP
-0.20%
Containers & Packaging Industry
- Max
- 36.99%
- Q3
- 19.86%
- Median
- 10.47%
- Q1
- 6.76%
- Min
- -0.20%
IP has a negative Return on Equity of -0.20%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.
Net Profit Margin (TTM)
FLUT
2.46%
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 25.61%
- Q3
- 14.65%
- Median
- 8.66%
- Q1
- 3.36%
- Min
- -9.83%
Falling into the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, FLUT’s Net Profit Margin of 2.46% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.
IP
-0.12%
Containers & Packaging Industry
- Max
- 10.84%
- Q3
- 8.25%
- Median
- 4.91%
- Q1
- 3.65%
- Min
- -0.12%
IP has a negative Net Profit Margin of -0.12%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)
FLUT
6.53%
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 45.80%
- Q3
- 22.44%
- Median
- 14.98%
- Q1
- 6.59%
- Min
- -15.28%
FLUT’s Operating Profit Margin of 6.53% is in the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.
IP
-0.07%
Containers & Packaging Industry
- Max
- 22.03%
- Q3
- 13.09%
- Median
- 8.06%
- Q1
- 6.46%
- Min
- -0.07%
IP has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -0.07%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.
Profitability at a Glance
| Symbol | FLUT | IP |
|---|---|---|
| Return on Equity (TTM) | 3.70% | -0.20% |
| Return on Assets (TTM) | 1.40% | -0.08% |
| Net Profit Margin (TTM) | 2.46% | -0.12% |
| Operating Profit Margin (TTM) | 6.53% | -0.07% |
| Gross Profit Margin (TTM) | 46.94% | 28.30% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
FLUT
0.95
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 2.73
- Q3
- 1.63
- Median
- 1.12
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.18
FLUT’s Current Ratio of 0.95 aligns with the median group of the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.
IP
1.33
Containers & Packaging Industry
- Max
- 1.96
- Q3
- 1.45
- Median
- 1.33
- Q1
- 1.09
- Min
- 0.87
IP’s Current Ratio of 1.33 aligns with the median group of the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)
FLUT
0.97
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 11.29
- Q3
- 4.71
- Median
- 1.65
- Q1
- 0.27
- Min
- 0.00
FLUT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.97 is typical for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.
IP
0.53
Containers & Packaging Industry
- Max
- 4.15
- Q3
- 2.03
- Median
- 1.20
- Q1
- 0.53
- Min
- 0.23
Falling into the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, IP’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.53 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)
FLUT
1.02
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 21.72
- Q3
- 11.40
- Median
- 4.02
- Q1
- 1.19
- Min
- -11.84
In the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, FLUT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.02 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.
IP
1.71
Containers & Packaging Industry
- Max
- 13.16
- Q3
- 8.10
- Median
- 3.38
- Q1
- 2.83
- Min
- 1.06
In the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, IP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.71 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.
Financial Strength at a Glance
| Symbol | FLUT | IP |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 0.95 | 1.33 |
| Quick Ratio (MRQ) | 0.89 | 0.96 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) | 0.97 | 0.53 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 1.02 | 1.71 |
Growth
Revenue Growth
EPS Growth
Dividend
Dividend Yield (TTM)
FLUT
0.00%
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 6.81%
- Q3
- 2.73%
- Median
- 0.74%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
FLUT currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.
IP
3.27%
Containers & Packaging Industry
- Max
- 7.14%
- Q3
- 4.65%
- Median
- 3.69%
- Q1
- 2.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
IP’s Dividend Yield of 3.27% is consistent with its peers in the Containers & Packaging industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
FLUT
0.00%
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 128.39%
- Q3
- 61.60%
- Median
- 21.91%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
FLUT has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.
IP
180.00%
Containers & Packaging Industry
- Max
- 222.75%
- Q3
- 132.16%
- Median
- 65.79%
- Q1
- 28.53%
- Min
- 0.00%
IP’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 180.00% is in the upper quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.
Dividend at a Glance
| Symbol | FLUT | IP |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 3.27% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 0.00% | 180.00% |
Valuation
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)
FLUT
123.26
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 56.96
- Q3
- 33.82
- Median
- 21.30
- Q1
- 15.75
- Min
- 6.06
At 123.26, FLUT’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.
IP
--
Containers & Packaging Industry
- Max
- 24.22
- Q3
- 20.28
- Median
- 17.07
- Q1
- 15.06
- Min
- 7.79
P/E Ratio data for IP is currently unavailable.
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)
FLUT
3.03
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 7.19
- Q3
- 3.99
- Median
- 1.93
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- 0.17
FLUT’s P/S Ratio of 3.03 aligns with the market consensus for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.
IP
1.13
Containers & Packaging Industry
- Max
- 1.99
- Q3
- 1.17
- Median
- 0.94
- Q1
- 0.55
- Min
- 0.31
IP’s P/S Ratio of 1.13 aligns with the market consensus for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)
FLUT
4.93
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry
- Max
- 24.89
- Q3
- 11.60
- Median
- 4.91
- Q1
- 2.29
- Min
- 0.37
FLUT’s P/B Ratio of 4.93 is within the conventional range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.
IP
1.33
Containers & Packaging Industry
- Max
- 4.79
- Q3
- 3.32
- Median
- 2.14
- Q1
- 1.60
- Min
- 0.89
IP’s P/B Ratio of 1.33 is in the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.
Valuation at a Glance
| Symbol | FLUT | IP |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) | 123.26 | -- |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) | 3.03 | 1.13 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) | 4.93 | 1.33 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM) | 54.42 | 49.38 |