Seek Returns logo

FLUT vs. HTHT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at FLUT and HTHT, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

FLUT is a standard domestic listing, while HTHT trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolFLUTHTHT
Company NameFlutter Entertainment plcH World Group Limited
CountryUnited StatesChina
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryHotels, Restaurants & LeisureHotels, Restaurants & Leisure
Market Capitalization51.64 billion USD10.15 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateOctober 4, 2002March 26, 2010
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FLUT and HTHT by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FLUT vs. HTHT: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFLUTHTHT
5-Day Price Return-4.04%1.52%
13-Week Price Return18.80%-13.97%
26-Week Price Return10.37%6.19%
52-Week Price Return55.99%4.19%
Month-to-Date Return-2.83%3.59%
Year-to-Date Return13.65%-2.38%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.66M2.59M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.55M2.53M
3-Month Volatility32.59%26.96%
Beta1.170.50

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FLUT

5.32%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
83.01%
Q3
39.51%
Median
17.38%
Q1
5.32%
Min
-45.92%

FLUT’s Return on Equity of 5.32% is on par with the norm for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

HTHT

27.71%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
83.01%
Q3
39.51%
Median
17.38%
Q1
5.32%
Min
-45.92%

HTHT’s Return on Equity of 27.71% is on par with the norm for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

FLUT vs. HTHT: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FLUT

3.65%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
26.45%
Q3
14.67%
Median
8.69%
Q1
3.34%
Min
-11.30%

FLUT’s Net Profit Margin of 3.65% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

HTHT

13.67%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
26.45%
Q3
14.67%
Median
8.69%
Q1
3.34%
Min
-11.30%

HTHT’s Net Profit Margin of 13.67% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

FLUT vs. HTHT: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FLUT

6.71%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
38.76%
Q3
21.15%
Median
14.20%
Q1
6.43%
Min
-14.56%

FLUT’s Operating Profit Margin of 6.71% is around the midpoint for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

HTHT

21.99%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
38.76%
Q3
21.15%
Median
14.20%
Q1
6.43%
Min
-14.56%

An Operating Profit Margin of 21.99% places HTHT in the upper quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

FLUT vs. HTHT: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFLUTHTHT
Return on Equity (TTM)5.32%27.71%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.11%5.28%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)3.65%13.67%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)6.71%21.99%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)47.55%66.77%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FLUT

0.95

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
2.68
Q3
1.62
Median
1.11
Q1
0.74
Min
0.19

FLUT’s Current Ratio of 0.95 aligns with the median group of the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

HTHT

0.88

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
2.68
Q3
1.62
Median
1.11
Q1
0.74
Min
0.19

HTHT’s Current Ratio of 0.88 aligns with the median group of the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

FLUT vs. HTHT: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FLUT

0.69

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
9.88
Q3
4.54
Median
1.52
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

FLUT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.69 is typical for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

HTHT

0.79

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
9.88
Q3
4.54
Median
1.52
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

HTHT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.79 is typical for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

FLUT vs. HTHT: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FLUT

1.02

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
26.88
Q3
11.95
Median
3.87
Q1
1.19
Min
-11.84

In the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, FLUT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.02 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

HTHT

11.77

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
26.88
Q3
11.95
Median
3.87
Q1
1.19
Min
-11.84

HTHT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 11.77 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

FLUT vs. HTHT: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFLUTHTHT
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.950.88
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.880.88
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.690.79
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)1.0211.77

Growth

Revenue Growth

FLUT vs. HTHT: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FLUT vs. HTHT: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FLUT

0.00%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
5.88%
Q3
2.37%
Median
0.68%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FLUT currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

HTHT

1.99%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
5.88%
Q3
2.37%
Median
0.68%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

HTHT’s Dividend Yield of 1.99% is consistent with its peers in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

FLUT vs. HTHT: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FLUT

0.00%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
127.31%
Q3
56.79%
Median
19.58%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FLUT has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

HTHT

180.12%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
127.31%
Q3
56.79%
Median
19.58%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

At 180.12%, HTHT’s Dividend Payout Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. While this provides a significant return to shareholders, it may limit funds for reinvestment and could be difficult to sustain.

FLUT vs. HTHT: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFLUTHTHT
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%1.99%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%180.12%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FLUT

99.19

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
59.44
Q3
33.98
Median
22.25
Q1
15.53
Min
7.61

At 99.19, FLUT’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

HTHT

21.21

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
59.44
Q3
33.98
Median
22.25
Q1
15.53
Min
7.61

HTHT’s P/E Ratio of 21.21 is within the middle range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

FLUT vs. HTHT: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FLUT

3.62

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
7.74
Q3
3.88
Median
2.05
Q1
1.19
Min
0.17

FLUT’s P/S Ratio of 3.62 aligns with the market consensus for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

HTHT

2.90

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
7.74
Q3
3.88
Median
2.05
Q1
1.19
Min
0.17

HTHT’s P/S Ratio of 2.90 aligns with the market consensus for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

FLUT vs. HTHT: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FLUT

3.98

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
20.90
Q3
9.78
Median
4.29
Q1
2.22
Min
0.47

FLUT’s P/B Ratio of 3.98 is within the conventional range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

HTHT

8.12

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
20.90
Q3
9.78
Median
4.29
Q1
2.22
Min
0.47

HTHT’s P/B Ratio of 8.12 is within the conventional range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

FLUT vs. HTHT: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFLUTHTHT
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)99.1921.21
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.622.90
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.988.12
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)61.3510.96