Seek Returns logo

FLUT vs. HMC: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at FLUT and HMC, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

FLUT is a standard domestic listing, while HMC trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolFLUTHMC
Company NameFlutter Entertainment plcHonda Motor Co., Ltd.
CountryUnited StatesJapan
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryHotels, Restaurants & LeisureAutomobiles
Market Capitalization45.08 billion USD40.85 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateOctober 4, 2002March 17, 1980
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FLUT and HMC by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FLUT vs. HMC: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFLUTHMC
5-Day Price Return-9.52%-8.88%
13-Week Price Return-8.81%7.82%
26-Week Price Return15.68%0.70%
52-Week Price Return10.16%36.87%
Month-to-Date Return0.91%-1.80%
Year-to-Date Return-0.83%-2.05%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.74M18.28M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.48M17.93M
3-Month Volatility32.97%32.91%
Beta1.210.12

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FLUT

3.70%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
84.03%
Q3
40.12%
Median
17.38%
Q1
7.45%
Min
-33.94%

FLUT’s Return on Equity of 3.70% is in the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

HMC

5.15%

Automobiles Industry

Max
28.52%
Q3
12.70%
Median
5.15%
Q1
-1.62%
Min
-18.19%

HMC’s Return on Equity of 5.15% is on par with the norm for the Automobiles industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

FLUT vs. HMC: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FLUT

2.46%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
25.61%
Q3
14.65%
Median
8.66%
Q1
3.36%
Min
-9.83%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, FLUT’s Net Profit Margin of 2.46% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

HMC

2.95%

Automobiles Industry

Max
8.82%
Q3
5.80%
Median
2.77%
Q1
-1.08%
Min
-10.15%

HMC’s Net Profit Margin of 2.95% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Automobiles industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

FLUT vs. HMC: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FLUT

6.53%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
45.80%
Q3
22.44%
Median
14.98%
Q1
6.59%
Min
-15.28%

FLUT’s Operating Profit Margin of 6.53% is in the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

HMC

4.50%

Automobiles Industry

Max
13.07%
Q3
6.94%
Median
4.50%
Q1
-2.17%
Min
-13.85%

HMC’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.50% is around the midpoint for the Automobiles industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

FLUT vs. HMC: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFLUTHMC
Return on Equity (TTM)3.70%5.15%
Return on Assets (TTM)1.40%2.10%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)2.46%2.95%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)6.53%4.50%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)46.94%20.99%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FLUT

0.95

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
2.73
Q3
1.63
Median
1.12
Q1
0.73
Min
0.18

FLUT’s Current Ratio of 0.95 aligns with the median group of the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

HMC

1.30

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.13
Q3
1.52
Median
1.29
Q1
1.09
Min
0.47

HMC’s Current Ratio of 1.30 aligns with the median group of the Automobiles industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

FLUT vs. HMC: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FLUT

0.97

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
11.29
Q3
4.71
Median
1.65
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

FLUT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.97 is typical for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

HMC

0.98

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.07
Q3
1.17
Median
0.60
Q1
0.30
Min
0.05

HMC’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.98 is typical for the Automobiles industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

FLUT vs. HMC: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FLUT

1.02

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
21.72
Q3
11.40
Median
4.02
Q1
1.19
Min
-11.84

In the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, FLUT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.02 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

HMC

685.89

Automobiles Industry

Max
77.87
Q3
37.26
Median
13.42
Q1
1.43
Min
-49.07

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 685.89, HMC demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Automobiles industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

FLUT vs. HMC: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFLUTHMC
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.951.30
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.891.01
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.970.98
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)1.02685.89

Growth

Revenue Growth

FLUT vs. HMC: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FLUT vs. HMC: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FLUT

0.00%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
6.81%
Q3
2.73%
Median
0.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FLUT currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

HMC

5.00%

Automobiles Industry

Max
10.85%
Q3
4.84%
Median
2.53%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 5.00%, HMC offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Automobiles industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

FLUT vs. HMC: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FLUT

0.00%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
128.39%
Q3
61.60%
Median
21.91%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FLUT has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

HMC

60.59%

Automobiles Industry

Max
131.16%
Q3
60.59%
Median
36.73%
Q1
5.97%
Min
0.00%

HMC’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 60.59% is within the typical range for the Automobiles industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

FLUT vs. HMC: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFLUTHMC
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%5.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%60.59%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FLUT

123.26

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
56.96
Q3
33.82
Median
21.30
Q1
15.75
Min
6.06

At 123.26, FLUT’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

HMC

9.63

Automobiles Industry

Max
31.95
Q3
22.20
Median
11.17
Q1
7.39
Min
4.54

HMC’s P/E Ratio of 9.63 is within the middle range for the Automobiles industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

FLUT vs. HMC: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FLUT

3.03

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
7.19
Q3
3.99
Median
1.93
Q1
1.26
Min
0.17

FLUT’s P/S Ratio of 3.03 aligns with the market consensus for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

HMC

0.28

Automobiles Industry

Max
1.49
Q3
0.92
Median
0.47
Q1
0.24
Min
0.09

HMC’s P/S Ratio of 0.28 aligns with the market consensus for the Automobiles industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

FLUT vs. HMC: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FLUT

4.93

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
24.89
Q3
11.60
Median
4.91
Q1
2.29
Min
0.37

FLUT’s P/B Ratio of 4.93 is within the conventional range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

HMC

0.62

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.87
Q3
1.83
Median
0.79
Q1
0.47
Min
0.18

HMC’s P/B Ratio of 0.62 is within the conventional range for the Automobiles industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

FLUT vs. HMC: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFLUTHMC
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)123.269.63
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.030.28
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.930.62
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)54.4224.50