Seek Returns logo

FLS vs. FTI: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at FLS and FTI, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolFLSFTI
Company NameFlowserve CorporationTechnipFMC plc
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsEnergy
GICS IndustryMachineryEnergy Equipment & Services
Market Capitalization7.06 billion USD14.39 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980June 15, 2001
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FLS and FTI by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FLS vs. FTI: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFLSFTI
5-Day Price Return3.07%-0.28%
13-Week Price Return6.18%13.89%
26-Week Price Return-14.81%13.59%
52-Week Price Return19.27%33.36%
Month-to-Date Return-3.69%-3.71%
Year-to-Date Return-6.17%21.01%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.83M2.57M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.51M4.36M
3-Month Volatility36.09%34.28%
Beta1.311.06

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FLS

13.94%

Machinery Industry

Max
34.68%
Q3
19.06%
Median
13.13%
Q1
8.53%
Min
-4.87%

FLS’s Return on Equity of 13.94% is on par with the norm for the Machinery industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

FTI

28.74%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
35.03%
Q3
20.76%
Median
14.62%
Q1
7.78%
Min
-6.65%

In the upper quartile for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, FTI’s Return on Equity of 28.74% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

FLS vs. FTI: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FLS

6.28%

Machinery Industry

Max
19.74%
Q3
11.24%
Median
8.13%
Q1
5.38%
Min
-1.11%

FLS’s Net Profit Margin of 6.28% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Machinery industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

FTI

9.60%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
16.78%
Q3
10.68%
Median
6.39%
Q1
3.11%
Min
1.00%

FTI’s Net Profit Margin of 9.60% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

FLS vs. FTI: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FLS

10.90%

Machinery Industry

Max
26.63%
Q3
16.15%
Median
11.27%
Q1
7.72%
Min
-4.91%

FLS’s Operating Profit Margin of 10.90% is around the midpoint for the Machinery industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

FTI

11.97%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
30.90%
Q3
17.97%
Median
10.83%
Q1
5.79%
Min
-5.29%

FTI’s Operating Profit Margin of 11.97% is around the midpoint for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

FLS vs. FTI: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFLSFTI
Return on Equity (TTM)13.94%28.74%
Return on Assets (TTM)5.32%9.19%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)6.28%9.60%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)10.90%11.97%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)33.12%20.44%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FLS

2.10

Machinery Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.32
Median
1.72
Q1
1.28
Min
0.78

FLS’s Current Ratio of 2.10 aligns with the median group of the Machinery industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

FTI

1.10

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
3.39
Q3
2.12
Median
1.44
Q1
1.11
Min
0.64

FTI’s Current Ratio of 1.10 falls into the lower quartile for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

FLS vs. FTI: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FLS

0.67

Machinery Industry

Max
1.49
Q3
0.75
Median
0.44
Q1
0.26
Min
0.00

FLS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.67 is typical for the Machinery industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

FTI

0.24

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
1.70
Q3
0.97
Median
0.47
Q1
0.35
Min
0.02

Falling into the lower quartile for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, FTI’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.24 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

FLS vs. FTI: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FLS

10.07

Machinery Industry

Max
67.55
Q3
33.79
Median
13.87
Q1
7.97
Min
-1.43

FLS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 10.07 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Machinery industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

FTI

23.50

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
49.88
Q3
25.59
Median
7.66
Q1
2.90
Min
-17.36

FTI’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 23.50 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

FLS vs. FTI: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFLSFTI
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.101.10
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.410.82
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.670.24
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)10.0723.50

Growth

Revenue Growth

FLS vs. FTI: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FLS vs. FTI: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FLS

1.58%

Machinery Industry

Max
5.32%
Q3
2.84%
Median
1.87%
Q1
1.09%
Min
0.00%

FLS’s Dividend Yield of 1.58% is consistent with its peers in the Machinery industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

FTI

0.59%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
6.99%
Q3
3.07%
Median
2.19%
Q1
0.38%
Min
0.00%

FTI’s Dividend Yield of 0.59% is consistent with its peers in the Energy Equipment & Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

FLS vs. FTI: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FLS

37.86%

Machinery Industry

Max
202.17%
Q3
98.65%
Median
55.54%
Q1
29.03%
Min
0.00%

FLS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 37.86% is within the typical range for the Machinery industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

FTI

9.28%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
200.86%
Q3
147.58%
Median
28.52%
Q1
15.22%
Min
0.00%

FTI’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 9.28% is in the lower quartile for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

FLS vs. FTI: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFLSFTI
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.58%0.59%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)37.86%9.28%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FLS

23.93

Machinery Industry

Max
53.66
Q3
31.29
Median
22.00
Q1
16.18
Min
7.00

FLS’s P/E Ratio of 23.93 is within the middle range for the Machinery industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

FTI

15.77

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
30.60
Q3
21.14
Median
12.35
Q1
10.72
Min
5.76

FTI’s P/E Ratio of 15.77 is within the middle range for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

FLS vs. FTI: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FLS

1.50

Machinery Industry

Max
5.04
Q3
2.72
Median
1.67
Q1
1.04
Min
0.24

FLS’s P/S Ratio of 1.50 aligns with the market consensus for the Machinery industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

FTI

1.51

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
2.20
Q3
1.58
Median
0.85
Q1
0.55
Min
0.23

FTI’s P/S Ratio of 1.51 aligns with the market consensus for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

FLS vs. FTI: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FLS

3.08

Machinery Industry

Max
7.23
Q3
3.90
Median
2.52
Q1
1.47
Min
0.49

FLS’s P/B Ratio of 3.08 is within the conventional range for the Machinery industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

FTI

4.44

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
3.73
Q3
2.43
Median
1.82
Q1
1.18
Min
0.27

At 4.44, FTI’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

FLS vs. FTI: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFLSFTI
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)23.9315.77
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.501.51
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.084.44
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)15.1510.89