Seek Returns logo

FLR vs. XPO: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at FLR and XPO, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolFLRXPO
Company NameFluor CorporationXPO, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryConstruction & EngineeringGround Transportation
Market Capitalization6.72 billion USD14.92 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateDecember 1, 2000October 7, 2003
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FLR and XPO by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FLR vs. XPO: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFLRXPO
5-Day Price Return-1.35%-1.56%
13-Week Price Return9.69%0.78%
26-Week Price Return4.53%-11.69%
52-Week Price Return-15.58%5.51%
Month-to-Date Return-26.81%5.30%
Year-to-Date Return-15.75%-3.42%
10-Day Avg. Volume4.22M1.06M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.98M1.48M
3-Month Volatility71.20%35.84%
Beta1.512.04

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FLR

105.11%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
29.61%
Q3
17.18%
Median
10.42%
Q1
8.10%
Min
-0.10%

FLR’s Return on Equity of 105.11% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

XPO

20.71%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
22.11%
Q3
13.84%
Median
9.66%
Q1
7.55%
Min
0.36%

In the upper quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, XPO’s Return on Equity of 20.71% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

FLR vs. XPO: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FLR

25.35%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
11.14%
Q3
6.17%
Median
3.85%
Q1
2.40%
Min
-0.05%

FLR’s Net Profit Margin of 25.35% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

XPO

4.31%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
32.20%
Q3
18.59%
Median
7.11%
Q1
4.13%
Min
-10.38%

XPO’s Net Profit Margin of 4.31% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Ground Transportation industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

FLR vs. XPO: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FLR

1.84%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
17.56%
Q3
9.36%
Median
5.46%
Q1
3.47%
Min
-1.93%

FLR’s Operating Profit Margin of 1.84% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

XPO

8.35%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
41.31%
Q3
23.16%
Median
11.33%
Q1
6.82%
Min
-12.08%

XPO’s Operating Profit Margin of 8.35% is around the midpoint for the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

FLR vs. XPO: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFLRXPO
Return on Equity (TTM)105.11%20.71%
Return on Assets (TTM)45.38%4.36%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)25.35%4.31%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)1.84%8.35%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)3.02%59.99%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FLR

1.62

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
1.98
Q3
1.53
Median
1.24
Q1
1.05
Min
0.66

FLR’s Current Ratio of 1.62 is in the upper quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

XPO

1.02

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.03
Q3
1.26
Median
0.89
Q1
0.73
Min
0.38

XPO’s Current Ratio of 1.02 aligns with the median group of the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

FLR vs. XPO: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FLR

0.18

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.49
Q3
1.19
Median
0.63
Q1
0.29
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, FLR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.18 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

XPO

1.91

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.51
Q3
1.51
Median
1.06
Q1
0.47
Min
0.00

XPO’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Ground Transportation industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.91. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

FLR vs. XPO: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FLR

--

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
23.59
Q3
14.49
Median
8.20
Q1
5.26
Min
-6.49

Interest Coverage Ratio data for FLR is currently unavailable.

XPO

3.12

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
51.07
Q3
22.54
Median
7.94
Q1
2.72
Min
-24.57

XPO’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.12 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Ground Transportation industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

FLR vs. XPO: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFLRXPO
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.621.02
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.621.02
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.181.91
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)--3.12

Growth

Revenue Growth

FLR vs. XPO: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FLR vs. XPO: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FLR

0.00%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
6.28%
Q3
3.25%
Median
2.02%
Q1
0.23%
Min
0.00%

FLR currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

XPO

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.44%
Q3
2.49%
Median
1.53%
Q1
0.39%
Min
0.00%

XPO currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

FLR vs. XPO: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FLR

10.51%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
139.17%
Q3
69.47%
Median
40.99%
Q1
10.51%
Min
0.00%

FLR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 10.51% is within the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

XPO

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
137.07%
Q3
74.71%
Median
41.16%
Q1
15.12%
Min
0.00%

XPO has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

FLR vs. XPO: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFLRXPO
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)10.51%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FLR

1.59

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
36.96
Q3
24.81
Median
15.45
Q1
12.51
Min
2.74

FLR’s P/E Ratio of 1.59 is below the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This may indicate that the stock is potentially undervalued, or it could reflect market concerns about the company’s future prospects.

XPO

41.08

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
42.59
Q3
24.86
Median
16.38
Q1
12.79
Min
4.37

A P/E Ratio of 41.08 places XPO in the upper quartile for the Ground Transportation industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

FLR vs. XPO: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FLR

0.40

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
3.22
Q3
1.63
Median
0.61
Q1
0.48
Min
0.11

In the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, FLR’s P/S Ratio of 0.40 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

XPO

1.77

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
4.02
Q3
2.20
Median
1.23
Q1
0.87
Min
0.22

XPO’s P/S Ratio of 1.77 aligns with the market consensus for the Ground Transportation industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

FLR vs. XPO: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FLR

1.42

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
5.74
Q3
3.33
Median
1.49
Q1
1.20
Min
0.23

FLR’s P/B Ratio of 1.42 is within the conventional range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

XPO

8.35

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
4.95
Q3
2.78
Median
1.38
Q1
1.17
Min
0.64

At 8.35, XPO’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Ground Transportation industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

FLR vs. XPO: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFLRXPO
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)1.5941.08
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.401.77
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.428.35
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)6.9667.48