Seek Returns logo

FLR vs. VRSK: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at FLR and VRSK, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolFLRVRSK
Company NameFluor CorporationVerisk Analytics, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryConstruction & EngineeringProfessional Services
Market Capitalization6.97 billion USD34.79 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateDecember 1, 2000October 7, 2009
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FLR and VRSK by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FLR vs. VRSK: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFLRVRSK
5-Day Price Return1.15%0.10%
13-Week Price Return-18.25%-18.10%
26-Week Price Return20.41%-16.32%
52-Week Price Return-9.43%-7.06%
Month-to-Date Return2.52%-0.98%
Year-to-Date Return-12.55%-9.58%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.06M1.26M
3-Month Avg. Volume4.14M1.06M
3-Month Volatility63.17%21.57%
Beta1.300.83

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FLR

105.11%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
26.79%
Q3
16.47%
Median
10.66%
Q1
8.46%
Min
-1.86%

FLR’s Return on Equity of 105.11% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

VRSK

439.17%

Professional Services Industry

Max
68.01%
Q3
35.32%
Median
21.92%
Q1
11.67%
Min
-20.25%

VRSK’s Return on Equity of 439.17% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Professional Services industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

FLR vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FLR

25.35%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
11.67%
Q3
6.13%
Median
3.82%
Q1
2.31%
Min
-2.77%

FLR’s Net Profit Margin of 25.35% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

VRSK

30.67%

Professional Services Industry

Max
31.75%
Q3
15.50%
Median
8.95%
Q1
4.51%
Min
0.35%

A Net Profit Margin of 30.67% places VRSK in the upper quartile for the Professional Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

FLR vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FLR

1.84%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
17.78%
Q3
9.61%
Median
6.19%
Q1
3.73%
Min
-1.78%

FLR’s Operating Profit Margin of 1.84% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

VRSK

43.94%

Professional Services Industry

Max
30.62%
Q3
19.06%
Median
13.60%
Q1
8.60%
Min
-2.18%

VRSK’s Operating Profit Margin of 43.94% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Professional Services industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

FLR vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFLRVRSK
Return on Equity (TTM)105.11%439.17%
Return on Assets (TTM)45.38%19.55%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)25.35%30.67%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)1.84%43.94%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)3.02%69.39%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FLR

1.62

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.17
Q3
1.50
Median
1.23
Q1
1.00
Min
0.65

FLR’s Current Ratio of 1.62 is in the upper quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

VRSK

1.53

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.28
Q3
1.75
Median
1.34
Q1
1.10
Min
0.47

VRSK’s Current Ratio of 1.53 aligns with the median group of the Professional Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

FLR vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FLR

0.18

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.37
Q3
1.24
Median
0.62
Q1
0.31
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, FLR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.18 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

VRSK

10.43

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.93
Q3
1.45
Median
0.98
Q1
0.45
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 10.43, VRSK operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Professional Services industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

FLR vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FLR

--

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
36.37
Q3
17.88
Median
8.20
Q1
4.98
Min
-6.49

Interest Coverage Ratio data for FLR is currently unavailable.

VRSK

43.51

Professional Services Industry

Max
39.45
Q3
20.41
Median
11.64
Q1
5.46
Min
-1.21

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 43.51, VRSK demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Professional Services industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

FLR vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFLRVRSK
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.621.53
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.621.44
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.1810.43
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)--43.51

Growth

Revenue Growth

FLR vs. VRSK: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FLR vs. VRSK: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FLR

0.00%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
5.80%
Q3
3.33%
Median
2.22%
Q1
0.21%
Min
0.00%

FLR currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

VRSK

0.68%

Professional Services Industry

Max
4.83%
Q3
2.44%
Median
1.52%
Q1
0.52%
Min
0.00%

VRSK’s Dividend Yield of 0.68% is consistent with its peers in the Professional Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

FLR vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FLR

0.00%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
139.17%
Q3
74.39%
Median
51.48%
Q1
15.67%
Min
0.00%

FLR has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

VRSK

25.76%

Professional Services Industry

Max
128.51%
Q3
69.03%
Median
47.00%
Q1
18.05%
Min
0.00%

VRSK’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 25.76% is within the typical range for the Professional Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

FLR vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFLRVRSK
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.68%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%25.76%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FLR

1.70

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
41.00
Q3
26.91
Median
16.02
Q1
13.49
Min
1.65

In the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, FLR’s P/E Ratio of 1.70 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

VRSK

38.11

Professional Services Industry

Max
52.60
Q3
33.83
Median
24.95
Q1
17.59
Min
7.96

A P/E Ratio of 38.11 places VRSK in the upper quartile for the Professional Services industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

FLR vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FLR

0.43

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.93
Q3
1.65
Median
0.71
Q1
0.45
Min
0.11

In the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, FLR’s P/S Ratio of 0.43 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

VRSK

11.69

Professional Services Industry

Max
8.27
Q3
4.40
Median
2.09
Q1
0.99
Min
0.17

With a P/S Ratio of 11.69, VRSK trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Professional Services industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

FLR vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FLR

1.42

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
7.96
Q3
4.06
Median
1.98
Q1
1.23
Min
0.24

FLR’s P/B Ratio of 1.42 is within the conventional range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

VRSK

139.79

Professional Services Industry

Max
18.75
Q3
9.53
Median
5.88
Q1
2.95
Min
0.59

At 139.79, VRSK’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Professional Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

FLR vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFLRVRSK
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)1.7038.11
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.4311.69
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.42139.79
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)7.4434.22