FLR vs. TT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on October 3, 2025

Here’s a clear look at FLR and TT, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Symbol	FLR	TT
Company Name	Fluor Corporation	Trane Technologies plc
Country	United States	Ireland
GICS Sector	Industrials	Industrials
GICS Industry	Construction & Engineering	Building Products
Market Capitalization	6.93 billion USD	94.66 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	December 1, 2000	March 17, 1980
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FLR and TT by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FLR vs. TT: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	FLR	TT
5-Day Price Return	-3.84%	4.42%
13-Week Price Return	-17.94%	-3.53%
26-Week Price Return	11.47%	19.85%
52-Week Price Return	-12.15%	9.90%
Month-to-Date Return	2.56%	1.53%
Year-to-Date Return	-14.70%	14.24%
10-Day Avg. Volume	4.01M	1.39M
3-Month Avg. Volume	4.26M	1.27M
3-Month Volatility	63.23%	25.48%
Beta	1.60	1.17

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FLR

105.11%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 26.79%
Q3: 16.47%
Median: 10.66%
Q1: 8.46%
Min: -1.86%

FLR’s Return on Equity of 105.11% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

TT

37.61%

Building Products Industry

Max: 46.90%
Q3: 27.60%
Median: 15.43%
Q1: 8.94%
Min: 0.77%

In the upper quartile for the Building Products industry, TT’s Return on Equity of 37.61% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

FLR vs. TT: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FLR

25.35%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 11.67%
Q3: 6.13%
Median: 3.82%
Q1: 2.31%
Min: -2.77%

FLR’s Net Profit Margin of 25.35% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

TT

13.76%

Building Products Industry

Max: 19.42%
Q3: 13.74%
Median: 8.72%
Q1: 4.81%
Min: 0.46%

A Net Profit Margin of 13.76% places TT in the upper quartile for the Building Products industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

FLR vs. TT: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FLR

1.84%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 17.78%
Q3: 9.61%
Median: 6.19%
Q1: 3.73%
Min: -1.78%

FLR’s Operating Profit Margin of 1.84% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

TT

18.39%

Building Products Industry

Max: 26.72%
Q3: 17.70%
Median: 12.14%
Q1: 9.54%
Min: 1.65%

An Operating Profit Margin of 18.39% places TT in the upper quartile for the Building Products industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

FLR vs. TT: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	FLR	TT
Return on Equity (TTM)	105.11%	37.61%
Return on Assets (TTM)	45.38%	13.90%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	25.35%	13.76%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	1.84%	18.39%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	3.02%	36.26%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FLR

1.62

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 2.17
Q3: 1.50
Median: 1.23
Q1: 1.00
Min: 0.65

FLR’s Current Ratio of 1.62 is in the upper quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

TT

1.10

Building Products Industry

Max: 3.10
Q3: 2.06
Median: 1.60
Q1: 1.30
Min: 0.88

TT’s Current Ratio of 1.10 falls into the lower quartile for the Building Products industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

FLR vs. TT: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FLR

0.18

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 2.37
Q3: 1.24
Median: 0.62
Q1: 0.31
Min: 0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, FLR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.18 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

TT

0.59

Building Products Industry

Max: 1.64
Q3: 1.02
Median: 0.62
Q1: 0.20
Min: 0.00

TT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.59 is typical for the Building Products industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

FLR vs. TT: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FLR

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 36.37
Q3: 17.88
Median: 8.20
Q1: 4.98
Min: -6.49

Interest Coverage Ratio data for FLR is currently unavailable.

TT

15.31

Building Products Industry

Max: 72.12
Q3: 34.39
Median: 23.97
Q1: 7.29
Min: 2.97

TT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 15.31 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Building Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

FLR vs. TT: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	FLR	TT
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.62	1.10
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	1.62	0.76
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.18	0.59
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	--	15.31

Growth

Revenue Growth

FLR vs. TT: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FLR vs. TT: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FLR

0.00%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 5.80%
Q3: 3.33%
Median: 2.22%
Q1: 0.21%
Min: 0.00%

FLR currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

TT

0.84%

Building Products Industry

Max: 2.51%
Q3: 1.92%
Median: 1.30%
Q1: 0.78%
Min: 0.00%

TT’s Dividend Yield of 0.84% is consistent with its peers in the Building Products industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

FLR vs. TT: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FLR

0.00%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 139.17%
Q3: 74.39%
Median: 51.48%
Q1: 15.67%
Min: 0.00%

FLR has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

TT

27.94%

Building Products Industry

Max: 157.36%
Q3: 76.90%
Median: 30.70%
Q1: 17.97%
Min: 0.00%

TT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 27.94% is within the typical range for the Building Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

FLR vs. TT: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	FLR	TT
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.00%	0.84%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	0.00%	27.94%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FLR

1.65

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 41.00
Q3: 26.91
Median: 16.02
Q1: 13.49
Min: 1.65

In the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, FLR’s P/E Ratio of 1.65 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

TT

33.14

Building Products Industry

Max: 45.60
Q3: 30.36
Median: 21.97
Q1: 17.37
Min: 12.44

A P/E Ratio of 33.14 places TT in the upper quartile for the Building Products industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

FLR vs. TT: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FLR

0.42

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 2.93
Q3: 1.65
Median: 0.71
Q1: 0.45
Min: 0.11

In the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, FLR’s P/S Ratio of 0.42 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

TT

4.56

Building Products Industry

Max: 5.90
Q3: 3.09
Median: 1.72
Q1: 1.07
Min: 0.37

TT’s P/S Ratio of 4.56 is in the upper echelon for the Building Products industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

FLR vs. TT: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FLR

1.42

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 7.96
Q3: 4.06
Median: 1.98
Q1: 1.23
Min: 0.24

FLR’s P/B Ratio of 1.42 is within the conventional range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

TT

12.45

Building Products Industry

Max: 10.99
Q3: 5.69
Median: 2.98
Q1: 1.80
Min: 0.66

At 12.45, TT’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Building Products industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

FLR vs. TT: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	FLR	TT
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	1.65	33.14
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	0.42	4.56
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	1.42	12.45
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	7.22	33.67