Seek Returns logo

FLR vs. RSG: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at FLR and RSG, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolFLRRSG
Company NameFluor CorporationRepublic Services, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryConstruction & EngineeringCommercial Services & Supplies
Market Capitalization6.89 billion USD72.67 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateDecember 1, 2000July 1, 1998
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FLR and RSG by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FLR vs. RSG: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFLRRSG
5-Day Price Return-3.35%-1.23%
13-Week Price Return13.64%-3.61%
26-Week Price Return-12.60%5.04%
52-Week Price Return-11.37%16.66%
Month-to-Date Return-24.87%0.91%
Year-to-Date Return-13.52%15.69%
10-Day Avg. Volume7.35M1.46M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.93M1.43M
3-Month Volatility71.66%20.20%
Beta1.510.61

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FLR

105.11%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
29.61%
Q3
17.18%
Median
10.42%
Q1
8.10%
Min
-0.10%

FLR’s Return on Equity of 105.11% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

RSG

18.34%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
31.93%
Q3
18.03%
Median
9.43%
Q1
6.44%
Min
-9.69%

In the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, RSG’s Return on Equity of 18.34% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

FLR vs. RSG: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FLR

25.35%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
11.14%
Q3
6.17%
Median
3.85%
Q1
2.40%
Min
-0.05%

FLR’s Net Profit Margin of 25.35% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

RSG

12.98%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
17.53%
Q3
9.01%
Median
5.20%
Q1
2.75%
Min
-2.31%

A Net Profit Margin of 12.98% places RSG in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

FLR vs. RSG: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FLR

1.84%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
17.56%
Q3
9.36%
Median
5.46%
Q1
3.47%
Min
-1.93%

FLR’s Operating Profit Margin of 1.84% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

RSG

20.24%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
23.43%
Q3
12.19%
Median
8.10%
Q1
3.18%
Min
-6.03%

An Operating Profit Margin of 20.24% places RSG in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

FLR vs. RSG: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFLRRSG
Return on Equity (TTM)105.11%18.34%
Return on Assets (TTM)45.38%6.50%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)25.35%12.98%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)1.84%20.24%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)3.02%42.28%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FLR

1.62

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
1.98
Q3
1.53
Median
1.24
Q1
1.05
Min
0.66

FLR’s Current Ratio of 1.62 is in the upper quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

RSG

0.66

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
2.94
Q3
1.89
Median
1.38
Q1
0.87
Min
0.53

RSG’s Current Ratio of 0.66 falls into the lower quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

FLR vs. RSG: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FLR

0.18

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.49
Q3
1.19
Median
0.63
Q1
0.29
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, FLR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.18 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

RSG

1.08

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
1.67
Q3
1.08
Median
0.73
Q1
0.36
Min
0.00

RSG’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.08 is typical for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

FLR vs. RSG: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FLR

--

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
23.59
Q3
14.49
Median
8.20
Q1
5.26
Min
-6.49

Interest Coverage Ratio data for FLR is currently unavailable.

RSG

4.10

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
24.70
Q3
12.37
Median
7.16
Q1
2.69
Min
-10.97

RSG’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 4.10 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

FLR vs. RSG: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFLRRSG
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.620.66
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.620.60
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.181.08
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)--4.10

Growth

Revenue Growth

FLR vs. RSG: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FLR vs. RSG: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FLR

0.00%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
6.28%
Q3
3.25%
Median
2.02%
Q1
0.23%
Min
0.00%

FLR currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

RSG

0.98%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
3.44%
Q3
2.30%
Median
1.37%
Q1
0.63%
Min
0.00%

RSG’s Dividend Yield of 0.98% is consistent with its peers in the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

FLR vs. RSG: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FLR

10.51%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
139.17%
Q3
69.47%
Median
40.99%
Q1
10.51%
Min
0.00%

FLR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 10.51% is within the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

RSG

33.52%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
137.88%
Q3
72.93%
Median
40.45%
Q1
23.31%
Min
0.00%

RSG’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 33.52% is within the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

FLR vs. RSG: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFLRRSG
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.98%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)10.51%33.52%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FLR

1.68

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
36.96
Q3
24.81
Median
15.45
Q1
12.51
Min
2.74

FLR’s P/E Ratio of 1.68 is below the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This may indicate that the stock is potentially undervalued, or it could reflect market concerns about the company’s future prospects.

RSG

34.17

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
57.20
Q3
37.10
Median
22.38
Q1
16.35
Min
0.00

RSG’s P/E Ratio of 34.17 is within the middle range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

FLR vs. RSG: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FLR

0.43

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
3.22
Q3
1.63
Median
0.61
Q1
0.48
Min
0.11

In the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, FLR’s P/S Ratio of 0.43 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

RSG

4.44

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
4.64
Q3
2.28
Median
0.97
Q1
0.64
Min
0.00

RSG’s P/S Ratio of 4.44 is in the upper echelon for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

FLR vs. RSG: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FLR

1.42

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
5.74
Q3
3.33
Median
1.49
Q1
1.20
Min
0.23

FLR’s P/B Ratio of 1.42 is within the conventional range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

RSG

6.40

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
6.71
Q3
4.38
Median
2.39
Q1
1.57
Min
0.43

RSG’s P/B Ratio of 6.40 is in the upper tier for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

FLR vs. RSG: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFLRRSG
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)1.6834.17
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.434.44
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.426.40
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)7.3630.81