Seek Returns logo

FLR vs. ROP: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at FLR and ROP, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolFLRROP
Company NameFluor CorporationRoper Technologies, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsInformation Technology
GICS IndustryConstruction & EngineeringSoftware
Market Capitalization6.97 billion USD53.80 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateDecember 1, 2000February 13, 1992
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FLR and ROP by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FLR vs. ROP: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFLRROP
5-Day Price Return1.15%-0.20%
13-Week Price Return-18.25%-12.75%
26-Week Price Return20.41%-15.20%
52-Week Price Return-9.43%-9.33%
Month-to-Date Return2.52%0.25%
Year-to-Date Return-12.55%-3.83%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.06M0.85M
3-Month Avg. Volume4.14M0.70M
3-Month Volatility63.17%16.61%
Beta1.300.96

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FLR

105.11%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
26.79%
Q3
16.47%
Median
10.66%
Q1
8.46%
Min
-1.86%

FLR’s Return on Equity of 105.11% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

ROP

8.08%

Software Industry

Max
66.28%
Q3
21.28%
Median
9.33%
Q1
-8.77%
Min
-48.16%

ROP’s Return on Equity of 8.08% is on par with the norm for the Software industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

FLR vs. ROP: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Software industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FLR

25.35%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
11.67%
Q3
6.13%
Median
3.82%
Q1
2.31%
Min
-2.77%

FLR’s Net Profit Margin of 25.35% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

ROP

20.62%

Software Industry

Max
51.92%
Q3
19.23%
Median
6.98%
Q1
-7.14%
Min
-41.00%

A Net Profit Margin of 20.62% places ROP in the upper quartile for the Software industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

FLR vs. ROP: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Software industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FLR

1.84%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
17.78%
Q3
9.61%
Median
6.19%
Q1
3.73%
Min
-1.78%

FLR’s Operating Profit Margin of 1.84% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

ROP

28.06%

Software Industry

Max
60.40%
Q3
21.25%
Median
9.90%
Q1
-4.97%
Min
-43.50%

An Operating Profit Margin of 28.06% places ROP in the upper quartile for the Software industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

FLR vs. ROP: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Software industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFLRROP
Return on Equity (TTM)105.11%8.08%
Return on Assets (TTM)45.38%4.83%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)25.35%20.62%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)1.84%28.06%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)3.02%68.87%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FLR

1.62

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.17
Q3
1.50
Median
1.23
Q1
1.00
Min
0.65

FLR’s Current Ratio of 1.62 is in the upper quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

ROP

0.46

Software Industry

Max
4.29
Q3
2.37
Median
1.40
Q1
1.03
Min
0.25

ROP’s Current Ratio of 0.46 falls into the lower quartile for the Software industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

FLR vs. ROP: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Software industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FLR

0.18

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.37
Q3
1.24
Median
0.62
Q1
0.31
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, FLR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.18 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

ROP

0.45

Software Industry

Max
2.16
Q3
0.86
Median
0.31
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

ROP’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.45 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

FLR vs. ROP: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Software industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FLR

--

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
36.37
Q3
17.88
Median
8.20
Q1
4.98
Min
-6.49

Interest Coverage Ratio data for FLR is currently unavailable.

ROP

80.97

Software Industry

Max
89.65
Q3
32.64
Median
1.00
Q1
-9.84
Min
-71.23

ROP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 80.97 is in the upper quartile for the Software industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

FLR vs. ROP: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Software industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFLRROP
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.620.46
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.620.43
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.180.45
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)--80.97

Growth

Revenue Growth

FLR vs. ROP: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FLR vs. ROP: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FLR

0.00%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
5.80%
Q3
3.33%
Median
2.22%
Q1
0.21%
Min
0.00%

FLR currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

ROP

0.63%

Software Industry

Max
0.22%
Q3
0.11%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ROP’s Dividend Yield of 0.63% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Software industry. While this may seem attractive, an unusually high yield can sometimes be a warning sign, reflecting a falling stock price or market concerns about the dividend’s sustainability.

FLR vs. ROP: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Software industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FLR

0.00%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
139.17%
Q3
74.39%
Median
51.48%
Q1
15.67%
Min
0.00%

FLR has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

ROP

21.99%

Software Industry

Max
3.29%
Q3
2.41%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

At 21.99%, ROP’s Dividend Payout Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical range for the Software industry. While this provides a significant return to shareholders, it may limit funds for reinvestment and could be difficult to sustain.

FLR vs. ROP: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Software industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFLRROP
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.63%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%21.99%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FLR

1.70

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
41.00
Q3
26.91
Median
16.02
Q1
13.49
Min
1.65

In the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, FLR’s P/E Ratio of 1.70 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

ROP

35.08

Software Industry

Max
145.74
Q3
94.88
Median
45.35
Q1
26.66
Min
8.80

ROP’s P/E Ratio of 35.08 is within the middle range for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

FLR vs. ROP: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Software industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FLR

0.43

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.93
Q3
1.65
Median
0.71
Q1
0.45
Min
0.11

In the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, FLR’s P/S Ratio of 0.43 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

ROP

7.23

Software Industry

Max
25.67
Q3
13.68
Median
8.28
Q1
4.95
Min
0.90

ROP’s P/S Ratio of 7.23 aligns with the market consensus for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

FLR vs. ROP: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Software industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FLR

1.42

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
7.96
Q3
4.06
Median
1.98
Q1
1.23
Min
0.24

FLR’s P/B Ratio of 1.42 is within the conventional range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

ROP

3.10

Software Industry

Max
30.67
Q3
14.92
Median
8.52
Q1
3.89
Min
0.38

ROP’s P/B Ratio of 3.10 is in the lower quartile for the Software industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

FLR vs. ROP: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Software industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFLRROP
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)1.7035.08
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.437.23
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.423.10
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)7.4423.66