Seek Returns logo

FLR vs. ROK: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at FLR and ROK, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolFLRROK
Company NameFluor CorporationRockwell Automation, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryConstruction & EngineeringElectrical Equipment
Market Capitalization6.89 billion USD39.24 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateDecember 1, 2000December 31, 1981
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FLR and ROK by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FLR vs. ROK: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFLRROK
5-Day Price Return-3.35%4.94%
13-Week Price Return13.64%16.42%
26-Week Price Return-12.60%29.88%
52-Week Price Return-11.37%37.94%
Month-to-Date Return-24.87%-0.77%
Year-to-Date Return-13.52%22.12%
10-Day Avg. Volume7.35M1.32M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.93M1.00M
3-Month Volatility71.66%21.53%
Beta1.511.42

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FLR

105.11%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
29.61%
Q3
17.18%
Median
10.42%
Q1
8.10%
Min
-0.10%

FLR’s Return on Equity of 105.11% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

ROK

28.15%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
37.56%
Q3
20.60%
Median
14.38%
Q1
4.35%
Min
0.90%

In the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry, ROK’s Return on Equity of 28.15% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

FLR vs. ROK: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FLR

25.35%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
11.14%
Q3
6.17%
Median
3.85%
Q1
2.40%
Min
-0.05%

FLR’s Net Profit Margin of 25.35% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

ROK

12.03%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
20.43%
Q3
10.97%
Median
6.07%
Q1
3.16%
Min
0.29%

A Net Profit Margin of 12.03% places ROK in the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

FLR vs. ROK: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FLR

1.84%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
17.56%
Q3
9.36%
Median
5.46%
Q1
3.47%
Min
-1.93%

FLR’s Operating Profit Margin of 1.84% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

ROK

13.99%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
26.20%
Q3
14.31%
Median
7.54%
Q1
3.77%
Min
-5.64%

ROK’s Operating Profit Margin of 13.99% is around the midpoint for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

FLR vs. ROK: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFLRROK
Return on Equity (TTM)105.11%28.15%
Return on Assets (TTM)45.38%8.75%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)25.35%12.03%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)1.84%13.99%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)3.02%39.43%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FLR

1.62

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
1.98
Q3
1.53
Median
1.24
Q1
1.05
Min
0.66

FLR’s Current Ratio of 1.62 is in the upper quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

ROK

1.06

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
3.02
Q3
1.99
Median
1.41
Q1
1.07
Min
0.80

ROK’s Current Ratio of 1.06 falls into the lower quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

FLR vs. ROK: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FLR

0.18

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.49
Q3
1.19
Median
0.63
Q1
0.29
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, FLR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.18 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

ROK

1.00

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
1.44
Q3
0.99
Median
0.56
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

ROK’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Electrical Equipment industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.00. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

FLR vs. ROK: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FLR

--

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
23.59
Q3
14.49
Median
8.20
Q1
5.26
Min
-6.49

Interest Coverage Ratio data for FLR is currently unavailable.

ROK

--

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
36.12
Q3
19.29
Median
9.38
Q1
1.16
Min
-10.92

Interest Coverage Ratio data for ROK is currently unavailable.

FLR vs. ROK: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFLRROK
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.621.06
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.620.72
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.181.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)----

Growth

Revenue Growth

FLR vs. ROK: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FLR vs. ROK: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FLR

0.00%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
6.28%
Q3
3.25%
Median
2.02%
Q1
0.23%
Min
0.00%

FLR currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

ROK

1.50%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
2.20%
Q3
1.53%
Median
1.01%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ROK’s Dividend Yield of 1.50% is consistent with its peers in the Electrical Equipment industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

FLR vs. ROK: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FLR

10.51%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
139.17%
Q3
69.47%
Median
40.99%
Q1
10.51%
Min
0.00%

FLR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 10.51% is within the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

ROK

60.38%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
119.44%
Q3
51.87%
Median
27.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ROK’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 60.38% is in the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

FLR vs. ROK: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFLRROK
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%1.50%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)10.51%60.38%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FLR

1.68

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
36.96
Q3
24.81
Median
15.45
Q1
12.51
Min
2.74

FLR’s P/E Ratio of 1.68 is below the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This may indicate that the stock is potentially undervalued, or it could reflect market concerns about the company’s future prospects.

ROK

40.14

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
81.85
Q3
44.17
Median
27.61
Q1
18.62
Min
7.73

ROK’s P/E Ratio of 40.14 is within the middle range for the Electrical Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

FLR vs. ROK: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FLR

0.43

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
3.22
Q3
1.63
Median
0.61
Q1
0.48
Min
0.11

In the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, FLR’s P/S Ratio of 0.43 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

ROK

4.83

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
8.18
Q3
4.02
Median
1.84
Q1
0.97
Min
0.44

ROK’s P/S Ratio of 4.83 is in the upper echelon for the Electrical Equipment industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

FLR vs. ROK: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FLR

1.42

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
5.74
Q3
3.33
Median
1.49
Q1
1.20
Min
0.23

FLR’s P/B Ratio of 1.42 is within the conventional range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

ROK

10.81

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
8.50
Q3
4.53
Median
3.39
Q1
1.70
Min
0.51

At 10.81, ROK’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Electrical Equipment industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

FLR vs. ROK: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFLRROK
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)1.6840.14
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.434.83
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.4210.81
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)7.3629.49