FLR vs. MTZ: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
Updated onHere’s a clear look at FLR and MTZ, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.
Company Profile
| Symbol | FLR | MTZ |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Fluor Corporation | MasTec, Inc. |
| Country | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| GICS Industry | Construction & Engineering | Construction & Engineering |
| Market Capitalization | 6.89 billion USD | 14.33 billion USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | December 1, 2000 | February 21, 1973 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Historical Performance
This chart compares the performance of FLR and MTZ by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Historical Performance at a Glance
| Symbol | FLR | MTZ |
|---|---|---|
| 5-Day Price Return | -3.35% | -0.76% |
| 13-Week Price Return | 13.64% | 18.89% |
| 26-Week Price Return | -12.60% | 25.19% |
| 52-Week Price Return | -11.37% | 70.19% |
| Month-to-Date Return | -24.87% | -4.03% |
| Year-to-Date Return | -13.52% | 33.38% |
| 10-Day Avg. Volume | 7.35M | 1.29M |
| 3-Month Avg. Volume | 3.93M | 0.94M |
| 3-Month Volatility | 71.66% | 29.01% |
| Beta | 1.51 | 1.83 |
Profitability
Return on Equity (TTM)
FLR
105.11%
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 29.61%
- Q3
- 17.18%
- Median
- 10.42%
- Q1
- 8.10%
- Min
- -0.10%
FLR’s Return on Equity of 105.11% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.
MTZ
9.20%
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 29.61%
- Q3
- 17.18%
- Median
- 10.42%
- Q1
- 8.10%
- Min
- -0.10%
MTZ’s Return on Equity of 9.20% is on par with the norm for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.
Net Profit Margin (TTM)
FLR
25.35%
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 11.14%
- Q3
- 6.17%
- Median
- 3.85%
- Q1
- 2.40%
- Min
- -0.05%
FLR’s Net Profit Margin of 25.35% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.
MTZ
2.04%
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 11.14%
- Q3
- 6.17%
- Median
- 3.85%
- Q1
- 2.40%
- Min
- -0.05%
Falling into the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, MTZ’s Net Profit Margin of 2.04% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)
FLR
1.84%
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 17.56%
- Q3
- 9.36%
- Median
- 5.46%
- Q1
- 3.47%
- Min
- -1.93%
FLR’s Operating Profit Margin of 1.84% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.
MTZ
3.86%
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 17.56%
- Q3
- 9.36%
- Median
- 5.46%
- Q1
- 3.47%
- Min
- -1.93%
MTZ’s Operating Profit Margin of 3.86% is around the midpoint for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.
Profitability at a Glance
| Symbol | FLR | MTZ |
|---|---|---|
| Return on Equity (TTM) | 105.11% | 9.20% |
| Return on Assets (TTM) | 45.38% | 2.97% |
| Net Profit Margin (TTM) | 25.35% | 2.04% |
| Operating Profit Margin (TTM) | 1.84% | 3.86% |
| Gross Profit Margin (TTM) | 3.02% | 12.65% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
FLR
1.62
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 1.53
- Median
- 1.24
- Q1
- 1.05
- Min
- 0.66
FLR’s Current Ratio of 1.62 is in the upper quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.
MTZ
1.22
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 1.53
- Median
- 1.24
- Q1
- 1.05
- Min
- 0.66
MTZ’s Current Ratio of 1.22 aligns with the median group of the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)
FLR
0.18
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 2.49
- Q3
- 1.19
- Median
- 0.63
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
Falling into the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, FLR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.18 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.
MTZ
0.77
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 2.49
- Q3
- 1.19
- Median
- 0.63
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
MTZ’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.77 is typical for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)
FLR
--
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 23.59
- Q3
- 14.49
- Median
- 8.20
- Q1
- 5.26
- Min
- -6.49
Interest Coverage Ratio data for FLR is currently unavailable.
MTZ
2.54
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 23.59
- Q3
- 14.49
- Median
- 8.20
- Q1
- 5.26
- Min
- -6.49
In the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, MTZ’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.54 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.
Financial Strength at a Glance
| Symbol | FLR | MTZ |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.62 | 1.22 |
| Quick Ratio (MRQ) | 1.62 | 1.14 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) | 0.18 | 0.77 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -- | 2.54 |
Growth
Revenue Growth
EPS Growth
Dividend
Dividend Yield (TTM)
FLR
0.00%
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 6.28%
- Q3
- 3.25%
- Median
- 2.02%
- Q1
- 0.23%
- Min
- 0.00%
FLR currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.
MTZ
0.00%
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 6.28%
- Q3
- 3.25%
- Median
- 2.02%
- Q1
- 0.23%
- Min
- 0.00%
MTZ currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
FLR
10.51%
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 139.17%
- Q3
- 69.47%
- Median
- 40.99%
- Q1
- 10.51%
- Min
- 0.00%
FLR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 10.51% is within the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.
MTZ
0.00%
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 139.17%
- Q3
- 69.47%
- Median
- 40.99%
- Q1
- 10.51%
- Min
- 0.00%
MTZ has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.
Dividend at a Glance
| Symbol | FLR | MTZ |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 10.51% | 0.00% |
Valuation
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)
FLR
1.68
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 36.96
- Q3
- 24.81
- Median
- 15.45
- Q1
- 12.51
- Min
- 2.74
FLR’s P/E Ratio of 1.68 is below the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This may indicate that the stock is potentially undervalued, or it could reflect market concerns about the company’s future prospects.
MTZ
55.30
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 36.96
- Q3
- 24.81
- Median
- 15.45
- Q1
- 12.51
- Min
- 2.74
At 55.30, MTZ’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)
FLR
0.43
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 3.22
- Q3
- 1.63
- Median
- 0.61
- Q1
- 0.48
- Min
- 0.11
In the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, FLR’s P/S Ratio of 0.43 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.
MTZ
1.13
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 3.22
- Q3
- 1.63
- Median
- 0.61
- Q1
- 0.48
- Min
- 0.11
MTZ’s P/S Ratio of 1.13 aligns with the market consensus for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)
FLR
1.42
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 5.74
- Q3
- 3.33
- Median
- 1.49
- Q1
- 1.20
- Min
- 0.23
FLR’s P/B Ratio of 1.42 is within the conventional range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.
MTZ
4.56
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 5.74
- Q3
- 3.33
- Median
- 1.49
- Q1
- 1.20
- Min
- 0.23
MTZ’s P/B Ratio of 4.56 is in the upper tier for the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.
Valuation at a Glance
| Symbol | FLR | MTZ |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) | 1.68 | 55.30 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) | 0.43 | 1.13 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) | 1.42 | 4.56 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM) | 7.36 | 15.94 |