FLR vs. MTZ: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
Updated onHere’s a clear look at FLR and MTZ, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.
Company Profile
| Symbol | FLR | MTZ |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Fluor Corporation | MasTec, Inc. |
| Country | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| GICS Industry | Construction & Engineering | Construction & Engineering |
| Market Capitalization | 6.47 billion USD | 15.24 billion USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | December 1, 2000 | February 21, 1973 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Historical Performance
This chart compares the performance of FLR and MTZ by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Historical Performance at a Glance
| Symbol | FLR | MTZ |
|---|---|---|
| 5-Day Price Return | -4.34% | -0.21% |
| 13-Week Price Return | -1.19% | 10.45% |
| 26-Week Price Return | 6.99% | 21.90% |
| 52-Week Price Return | -23.01% | 34.71% |
| Month-to-Date Return | -16.85% | -6.04% |
| Year-to-Date Return | -17.78% | 40.90% |
| 10-Day Avg. Volume | 3.87M | 0.84M |
| 3-Month Avg. Volume | 4.08M | 0.97M |
| 3-Month Volatility | 41.34% | 39.56% |
| Beta | 1.40 | 1.92 |
Profitability
Return on Equity (TTM)
FLR
72.50%
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 26.79%
- Q3
- 16.67%
- Median
- 11.05%
- Q1
- 8.46%
- Min
- -2.38%
FLR’s Return on Equity of 72.50% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.
MTZ
11.17%
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 26.79%
- Q3
- 16.67%
- Median
- 11.05%
- Q1
- 8.46%
- Min
- -2.38%
MTZ’s Return on Equity of 11.17% is on par with the norm for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.
Net Profit Margin (TTM)
FLR
21.72%
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 11.67%
- Q3
- 6.49%
- Median
- 3.88%
- Q1
- 2.38%
- Min
- -2.27%
FLR’s Net Profit Margin of 21.72% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.
MTZ
2.41%
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 11.67%
- Q3
- 6.49%
- Median
- 3.88%
- Q1
- 2.38%
- Min
- -2.27%
MTZ’s Net Profit Margin of 2.41% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)
FLR
-1.57%
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 17.78%
- Q3
- 9.70%
- Median
- 5.84%
- Q1
- 3.94%
- Min
- -1.78%
FLR has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -1.57%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.
MTZ
4.20%
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 17.78%
- Q3
- 9.70%
- Median
- 5.84%
- Q1
- 3.94%
- Min
- -1.78%
MTZ’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.20% is around the midpoint for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.
Profitability at a Glance
| Symbol | FLR | MTZ |
|---|---|---|
| Return on Equity (TTM) | 72.50% | 11.17% |
| Return on Assets (TTM) | 33.17% | 3.61% |
| Net Profit Margin (TTM) | 21.72% | 2.41% |
| Operating Profit Margin (TTM) | -1.57% | 4.20% |
| Gross Profit Margin (TTM) | -0.29% | 12.54% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
FLR
1.45
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 2.26
- Q3
- 1.54
- Median
- 1.25
- Q1
- 0.99
- Min
- 0.65
FLR’s Current Ratio of 1.45 aligns with the median group of the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.
MTZ
1.33
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 2.26
- Q3
- 1.54
- Median
- 1.25
- Q1
- 0.99
- Min
- 0.65
MTZ’s Current Ratio of 1.33 aligns with the median group of the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)
FLR
0.21
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 2.54
- Q3
- 1.33
- Median
- 0.64
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
Falling into the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, FLR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.21 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.
MTZ
0.76
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 2.54
- Q3
- 1.33
- Median
- 0.64
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
MTZ’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.76 is typical for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)
FLR
--
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 30.69
- Q3
- 15.27
- Median
- 7.88
- Q1
- 4.27
- Min
- -6.49
Interest Coverage Ratio data for FLR is currently unavailable.
MTZ
2.54
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 30.69
- Q3
- 15.27
- Median
- 7.88
- Q1
- 4.27
- Min
- -6.49
In the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, MTZ’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.54 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.
Financial Strength at a Glance
| Symbol | FLR | MTZ |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.45 | 1.33 |
| Quick Ratio (MRQ) | 1.45 | 1.25 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) | 0.21 | 0.76 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -- | 2.54 |
Growth
Revenue Growth
EPS Growth
Dividend
Dividend Yield (TTM)
FLR
0.00%
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 5.80%
- Q3
- 3.25%
- Median
- 1.76%
- Q1
- 0.17%
- Min
- 0.00%
FLR currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.
MTZ
0.00%
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 5.80%
- Q3
- 3.25%
- Median
- 1.76%
- Q1
- 0.17%
- Min
- 0.00%
MTZ currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
FLR
0.00%
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 144.77%
- Q3
- 74.39%
- Median
- 50.47%
- Q1
- 8.02%
- Min
- 0.00%
FLR has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.
MTZ
0.00%
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 144.77%
- Q3
- 74.39%
- Median
- 50.47%
- Q1
- 8.02%
- Min
- 0.00%
MTZ has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.
Dividend at a Glance
| Symbol | FLR | MTZ |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Valuation
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)
FLR
1.93
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 39.16
- Q3
- 24.60
- Median
- 17.05
- Q1
- 13.85
- Min
- 1.65
In the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, FLR’s P/E Ratio of 1.93 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.
MTZ
45.71
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 39.16
- Q3
- 24.60
- Median
- 17.05
- Q1
- 13.85
- Min
- 1.65
At 45.71, MTZ’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)
FLR
0.42
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 2.86
- Q3
- 1.52
- Median
- 0.80
- Q1
- 0.48
- Min
- 0.12
In the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, FLR’s P/S Ratio of 0.42 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.
MTZ
1.10
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 2.86
- Q3
- 1.52
- Median
- 0.80
- Q1
- 0.48
- Min
- 0.12
MTZ’s P/S Ratio of 1.10 aligns with the market consensus for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)
FLR
1.31
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 7.53
- Q3
- 3.97
- Median
- 1.90
- Q1
- 1.22
- Min
- 0.24
FLR’s P/B Ratio of 1.31 is within the conventional range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.
MTZ
5.40
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 7.53
- Q3
- 3.97
- Median
- 1.90
- Q1
- 1.22
- Min
- 0.24
MTZ’s P/B Ratio of 5.40 is in the upper tier for the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.
Valuation at a Glance
| Symbol | FLR | MTZ |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) | 1.93 | 45.71 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) | 0.42 | 1.10 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) | 1.31 | 5.40 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM) | 6.92 | 31.88 |