FLR vs. LHX: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
Updated onHere’s a clear look at FLR and LHX, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.
Company Profile
| Symbol | FLR | LHX |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Fluor Corporation | L3Harris Technologies, Inc. |
| Country | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| GICS Industry | Construction & Engineering | Aerospace & Defense |
| Market Capitalization | 7.12 billion USD | 57.39 billion USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | December 1, 2000 | December 31, 1981 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Historical Performance
This chart compares the performance of FLR and LHX by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Historical Performance at a Glance
| Symbol | FLR | LHX |
|---|---|---|
| 5-Day Price Return | 1.31% | 3.60% |
| 13-Week Price Return | -14.72% | 18.42% |
| 26-Week Price Return | 29.64% | 46.12% |
| 52-Week Price Return | -13.03% | 26.89% |
| Month-to-Date Return | 4.68% | 0.44% |
| Year-to-Date Return | -10.71% | 45.88% |
| 10-Day Avg. Volume | 2.98M | 1.09M |
| 3-Month Avg. Volume | 4.10M | 1.20M |
| 3-Month Volatility | 63.35% | 15.04% |
| Beta | 1.30 | 0.67 |
Profitability
Return on Equity (TTM)
FLR
105.11%
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 26.79%
- Q3
- 16.47%
- Median
- 10.66%
- Q1
- 8.46%
- Min
- -1.86%
FLR’s Return on Equity of 105.11% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.
LHX
8.82%
Aerospace & Defense Industry
- Max
- 37.11%
- Q3
- 20.14%
- Median
- 11.72%
- Q1
- 6.30%
- Min
- -6.24%
LHX’s Return on Equity of 8.82% is on par with the norm for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.
Net Profit Margin (TTM)
FLR
25.35%
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 11.67%
- Q3
- 6.13%
- Median
- 3.82%
- Q1
- 2.31%
- Min
- -2.77%
FLR’s Net Profit Margin of 25.35% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.
LHX
7.94%
Aerospace & Defense Industry
- Max
- 13.66%
- Q3
- 8.61%
- Median
- 6.59%
- Q1
- 4.92%
- Min
- 1.01%
LHX’s Net Profit Margin of 7.94% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Aerospace & Defense industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)
FLR
1.84%
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 17.78%
- Q3
- 9.61%
- Median
- 6.19%
- Q1
- 3.73%
- Min
- -1.78%
FLR’s Operating Profit Margin of 1.84% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.
LHX
10.11%
Aerospace & Defense Industry
- Max
- 22.35%
- Q3
- 12.83%
- Median
- 9.29%
- Q1
- 6.38%
- Min
- -2.15%
LHX’s Operating Profit Margin of 10.11% is around the midpoint for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.
Profitability at a Glance
| Symbol | FLR | LHX |
|---|---|---|
| Return on Equity (TTM) | 105.11% | 8.82% |
| Return on Assets (TTM) | 45.38% | 4.08% |
| Net Profit Margin (TTM) | 25.35% | 7.94% |
| Operating Profit Margin (TTM) | 1.84% | 10.11% |
| Gross Profit Margin (TTM) | 3.02% | 25.74% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
FLR
1.62
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 2.17
- Q3
- 1.50
- Median
- 1.23
- Q1
- 1.00
- Min
- 0.65
FLR’s Current Ratio of 1.62 is in the upper quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.
LHX
1.04
Aerospace & Defense Industry
- Max
- 3.35
- Q3
- 2.03
- Median
- 1.24
- Q1
- 1.04
- Min
- 0.77
LHX’s Current Ratio of 1.04 falls into the lower quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)
FLR
0.18
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 2.37
- Q3
- 1.24
- Median
- 0.62
- Q1
- 0.31
- Min
- 0.00
Falling into the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, FLR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.18 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.
LHX
0.63
Aerospace & Defense Industry
- Max
- 1.72
- Q3
- 0.96
- Median
- 0.63
- Q1
- 0.37
- Min
- 0.03
LHX’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.63 is typical for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)
FLR
--
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 36.37
- Q3
- 17.88
- Median
- 8.20
- Q1
- 4.98
- Min
- -6.49
Interest Coverage Ratio data for FLR is currently unavailable.
LHX
3.37
Aerospace & Defense Industry
- Max
- 36.57
- Q3
- 19.08
- Median
- 7.25
- Q1
- 2.65
- Min
- -7.63
LHX’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.37 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.
Financial Strength at a Glance
| Symbol | FLR | LHX |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.62 | 1.04 |
| Quick Ratio (MRQ) | 1.62 | 0.87 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) | 0.18 | 0.63 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -- | 3.37 |
Growth
Revenue Growth
EPS Growth
Dividend
Dividend Yield (TTM)
FLR
0.00%
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 5.80%
- Q3
- 3.33%
- Median
- 2.22%
- Q1
- 0.21%
- Min
- 0.00%
FLR currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.
LHX
1.56%
Aerospace & Defense Industry
- Max
- 2.72%
- Q3
- 1.45%
- Median
- 0.48%
- Q1
- 0.08%
- Min
- 0.00%
With a Dividend Yield of 1.56%, LHX offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Aerospace & Defense industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
FLR
0.00%
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 139.17%
- Q3
- 74.39%
- Median
- 51.48%
- Q1
- 15.67%
- Min
- 0.00%
FLR has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.
LHX
52.68%
Aerospace & Defense Industry
- Max
- 110.40%
- Q3
- 50.43%
- Median
- 17.11%
- Q1
- 0.46%
- Min
- 0.00%
LHX’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 52.68% is in the upper quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.
Dividend at a Glance
| Symbol | FLR | LHX |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 1.56% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 0.00% | 52.68% |
Valuation
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)
FLR
1.68
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 41.00
- Q3
- 26.91
- Median
- 16.02
- Q1
- 13.49
- Min
- 1.65
In the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, FLR’s P/E Ratio of 1.68 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.
LHX
33.77
Aerospace & Defense Industry
- Max
- 67.20
- Q3
- 55.74
- Median
- 33.28
- Q1
- 27.49
- Min
- 15.02
LHX’s P/E Ratio of 33.77 is within the middle range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)
FLR
0.43
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 2.93
- Q3
- 1.65
- Median
- 0.71
- Q1
- 0.45
- Min
- 0.11
In the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, FLR’s P/S Ratio of 0.43 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.
LHX
2.68
Aerospace & Defense Industry
- Max
- 9.06
- Q3
- 4.87
- Median
- 2.47
- Q1
- 1.61
- Min
- 0.33
LHX’s P/S Ratio of 2.68 aligns with the market consensus for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)
FLR
1.42
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 7.96
- Q3
- 4.06
- Median
- 1.98
- Q1
- 1.23
- Min
- 0.24
FLR’s P/B Ratio of 1.42 is within the conventional range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.
LHX
2.40
Aerospace & Defense Industry
- Max
- 14.90
- Q3
- 8.93
- Median
- 4.70
- Q1
- 3.03
- Min
- 0.83
LHX’s P/B Ratio of 2.40 is in the lower quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.
Valuation at a Glance
| Symbol | FLR | LHX |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) | 1.68 | 33.77 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) | 0.43 | 2.68 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) | 1.42 | 2.40 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM) | 7.34 | 25.30 |