Seek Returns logo

FLR vs. HUBB: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at FLR and HUBB, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolFLRHUBB
Company NameFluor CorporationHubbell Incorporated
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryConstruction & EngineeringElectrical Equipment
Market Capitalization6.89 billion USD23.59 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateDecember 1, 2000June 5, 1972
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FLR and HUBB by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FLR vs. HUBB: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFLRHUBB
5-Day Price Return-3.35%6.25%
13-Week Price Return13.64%17.32%
26-Week Price Return-12.60%12.40%
52-Week Price Return-11.37%18.94%
Month-to-Date Return-24.87%1.48%
Year-to-Date Return-13.52%5.98%
10-Day Avg. Volume7.35M0.53M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.93M0.63M
3-Month Volatility71.66%26.09%
Beta1.510.98

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FLR

105.11%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
29.61%
Q3
17.18%
Median
10.42%
Q1
8.10%
Min
-0.10%

FLR’s Return on Equity of 105.11% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

HUBB

25.10%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
37.56%
Q3
20.60%
Median
14.38%
Q1
4.35%
Min
0.90%

In the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry, HUBB’s Return on Equity of 25.10% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

FLR vs. HUBB: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FLR

25.35%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
11.14%
Q3
6.17%
Median
3.85%
Q1
2.40%
Min
-0.05%

FLR’s Net Profit Margin of 25.35% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

HUBB

14.76%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
20.43%
Q3
10.97%
Median
6.07%
Q1
3.16%
Min
0.29%

A Net Profit Margin of 14.76% places HUBB in the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

FLR vs. HUBB: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FLR

1.84%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
17.56%
Q3
9.36%
Median
5.46%
Q1
3.47%
Min
-1.93%

FLR’s Operating Profit Margin of 1.84% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

HUBB

20.20%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
26.20%
Q3
14.31%
Median
7.54%
Q1
3.77%
Min
-5.64%

An Operating Profit Margin of 20.20% places HUBB in the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

FLR vs. HUBB: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFLRHUBB
Return on Equity (TTM)105.11%25.10%
Return on Assets (TTM)45.38%12.00%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)25.35%14.76%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)1.84%20.20%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)3.02%34.80%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FLR

1.62

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
1.98
Q3
1.53
Median
1.24
Q1
1.05
Min
0.66

FLR’s Current Ratio of 1.62 is in the upper quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

HUBB

1.30

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
3.02
Q3
1.99
Median
1.41
Q1
1.07
Min
0.80

HUBB’s Current Ratio of 1.30 aligns with the median group of the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

FLR vs. HUBB: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FLR

0.18

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.49
Q3
1.19
Median
0.63
Q1
0.29
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, FLR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.18 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

HUBB

0.53

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
1.44
Q3
0.99
Median
0.56
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

HUBB’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.53 is typical for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

FLR vs. HUBB: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FLR

--

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
23.59
Q3
14.49
Median
8.20
Q1
5.26
Min
-6.49

Interest Coverage Ratio data for FLR is currently unavailable.

HUBB

14.62

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
36.12
Q3
19.29
Median
9.38
Q1
1.16
Min
-10.92

HUBB’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 14.62 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

FLR vs. HUBB: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFLRHUBB
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.621.30
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.620.76
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.180.53
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)--14.62

Growth

Revenue Growth

FLR vs. HUBB: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FLR vs. HUBB: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FLR

0.00%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
6.28%
Q3
3.25%
Median
2.02%
Q1
0.23%
Min
0.00%

FLR currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

HUBB

1.19%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
2.20%
Q3
1.53%
Median
1.01%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

HUBB’s Dividend Yield of 1.19% is consistent with its peers in the Electrical Equipment industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

FLR vs. HUBB: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FLR

10.51%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
139.17%
Q3
69.47%
Median
40.99%
Q1
10.51%
Min
0.00%

FLR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 10.51% is within the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

HUBB

33.39%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
119.44%
Q3
51.87%
Median
27.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

HUBB’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 33.39% is within the typical range for the Electrical Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

FLR vs. HUBB: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFLRHUBB
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%1.19%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)10.51%33.39%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FLR

1.68

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
36.96
Q3
24.81
Median
15.45
Q1
12.51
Min
2.74

FLR’s P/E Ratio of 1.68 is below the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This may indicate that the stock is potentially undervalued, or it could reflect market concerns about the company’s future prospects.

HUBB

28.04

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
81.85
Q3
44.17
Median
27.61
Q1
18.62
Min
7.73

HUBB’s P/E Ratio of 28.04 is within the middle range for the Electrical Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

FLR vs. HUBB: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FLR

0.43

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
3.22
Q3
1.63
Median
0.61
Q1
0.48
Min
0.11

In the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, FLR’s P/S Ratio of 0.43 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

HUBB

4.14

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
8.18
Q3
4.02
Median
1.84
Q1
0.97
Min
0.44

HUBB’s P/S Ratio of 4.14 is in the upper echelon for the Electrical Equipment industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

FLR vs. HUBB: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FLR

1.42

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
5.74
Q3
3.33
Median
1.49
Q1
1.20
Min
0.23

FLR’s P/B Ratio of 1.42 is within the conventional range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

HUBB

6.25

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
8.50
Q3
4.53
Median
3.39
Q1
1.70
Min
0.51

HUBB’s P/B Ratio of 6.25 is in the upper tier for the Electrical Equipment industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

FLR vs. HUBB: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFLRHUBB
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)1.6828.04
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.434.14
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.426.25
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)7.3629.64