Seek Returns logo

FLEX vs. ZM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at FLEX and ZM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolFLEXZM
Company NameFlex Ltd.Zoom Communications Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS IndustryElectronic Equipment, Instruments & ComponentsSoftware
Market Capitalization18.90 billion USD21.90 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGS
Listing DateMarch 18, 1994April 18, 2019
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FLEX and ZM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FLEX vs. ZM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFLEXZM
5-Day Price Return1.29%1.10%
13-Week Price Return23.17%-12.44%
26-Week Price Return13.79%-16.50%
52-Week Price Return70.39%30.86%
Month-to-Date Return0.96%-2.24%
Year-to-Date Return31.15%-11.30%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.59M2.51M
3-Month Avg. Volume4.46M2.69M
3-Month Volatility31.84%21.31%
Beta1.160.78

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FLEX

16.77%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
29.99%
Q3
15.78%
Median
9.05%
Q1
5.63%
Min
-9.55%

In the upper quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, FLEX’s Return on Equity of 16.77% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

ZM

11.97%

Software Industry

Max
59.01%
Q3
21.98%
Median
7.15%
Q1
-11.12%
Min
-51.24%

ZM’s Return on Equity of 11.97% is on par with the norm for the Software industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

FLEX vs. ZM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Software industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FLEX

3.42%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
25.55%
Q3
12.80%
Median
7.58%
Q1
3.09%
Min
-8.70%

FLEX’s Net Profit Margin of 3.42% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

ZM

22.31%

Software Industry

Max
48.14%
Q3
18.23%
Median
5.60%
Q1
-9.22%
Min
-49.36%

A Net Profit Margin of 22.31% places ZM in the upper quartile for the Software industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

FLEX vs. ZM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Software industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FLEX

4.78%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
30.04%
Q3
16.04%
Median
9.75%
Q1
4.27%
Min
-12.63%

FLEX’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.78% is around the midpoint for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

ZM

18.13%

Software Industry

Max
57.34%
Q3
20.60%
Median
7.84%
Q1
-8.72%
Min
-51.37%

ZM’s Operating Profit Margin of 18.13% is around the midpoint for the Software industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

FLEX vs. ZM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Software industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFLEXZM
Return on Equity (TTM)16.77%11.97%
Return on Assets (TTM)4.59%9.72%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)3.42%22.31%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)4.78%18.13%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)8.94%75.85%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FLEX

1.30

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
4.43
Q3
2.88
Median
2.05
Q1
1.52
Min
0.64

FLEX’s Current Ratio of 1.30 falls into the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

ZM

4.57

Software Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.31
Median
1.45
Q1
1.03
Min
0.24

ZM’s Current Ratio of 4.57 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Software industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

FLEX vs. ZM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Software industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FLEX

0.74

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
1.14
Q3
0.54
Median
0.34
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

FLEX’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.74. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

ZM

0.00

Software Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
0.90
Median
0.29
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

ZM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

FLEX vs. ZM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Software industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FLEX

7.39

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
101.00
Q3
43.88
Median
13.27
Q1
3.73
Min
-18.73

FLEX’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.39 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

ZM

7.63

Software Industry

Max
67.02
Q3
19.86
Median
0.70
Q1
-12.50
Min
-53.00

ZM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.63 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Software industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

FLEX vs. ZM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Software industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFLEXZM
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.304.57
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.794.47
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.740.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)7.397.63

Growth

Revenue Growth

FLEX vs. ZM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FLEX vs. ZM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FLEX

0.00%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
4.86%
Q3
2.53%
Median
1.28%
Q1
0.16%
Min
0.00%

FLEX currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

ZM

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
0.08%
Q3
0.03%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ZM currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

FLEX vs. ZM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Software industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FLEX

0.00%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
161.37%
Q3
67.12%
Median
34.46%
Q1
3.82%
Min
0.00%

FLEX has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

ZM

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
1.32%
Q3
0.53%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ZM has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

FLEX vs. ZM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Software industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFLEXZM
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FLEX

21.13

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
73.87
Q3
41.11
Median
25.31
Q1
18.58
Min
8.59

FLEX’s P/E Ratio of 21.13 is within the middle range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

ZM

21.69

Software Industry

Max
149.35
Q3
100.21
Median
47.97
Q1
26.77
Min
11.68

In the lower quartile for the Software industry, ZM’s P/E Ratio of 21.69 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

FLEX vs. ZM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Software industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FLEX

0.72

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.74
Q3
3.49
Median
2.03
Q1
1.16
Min
0.11

In the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, FLEX’s P/S Ratio of 0.72 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

ZM

4.84

Software Industry

Max
25.24
Q3
13.52
Median
8.15
Q1
4.87
Min
0.98

In the lower quartile for the Software industry, ZM’s P/S Ratio of 4.84 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

FLEX vs. ZM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Software industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FLEX

2.53

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.45
Q3
3.49
Median
1.98
Q1
1.31
Min
0.35

FLEX’s P/B Ratio of 2.53 is within the conventional range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

ZM

2.66

Software Industry

Max
30.95
Q3
14.91
Median
7.75
Q1
3.60
Min
0.38

ZM’s P/B Ratio of 2.66 is in the lower quartile for the Software industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

FLEX vs. ZM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Software industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFLEXZM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)21.1321.69
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.724.84
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.532.66
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)17.0513.36