Seek Returns logo

FLEX vs. TTWO: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at FLEX and TTWO, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolFLEXTTWO
Company NameFlex Ltd.Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyCommunication Services
GICS IndustryElectronic Equipment, Instruments & ComponentsEntertainment
Market Capitalization22.26 billion USD43.44 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGS
Listing DateMarch 18, 1994April 15, 1997
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FLEX and TTWO by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FLEX vs. TTWO: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFLEXTTWO
5-Day Price Return-5.74%0.41%
13-Week Price Return22.43%1.23%
26-Week Price Return43.35%3.92%
52-Week Price Return58.45%29.23%
Month-to-Date Return-4.05%-8.32%
Year-to-Date Return56.26%27.68%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.78M2.43M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.83M1.71M
3-Month Volatility37.98%26.19%
Beta1.260.95

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FLEX

16.77%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
25.62%
Q3
13.32%
Median
9.23%
Q1
4.70%
Min
-3.60%

In the upper quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, FLEX’s Return on Equity of 16.77% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

TTWO

-108.38%

Entertainment Industry

Max
41.86%
Q3
22.17%
Median
13.67%
Q1
4.55%
Min
-17.95%

TTWO has a negative Return on Equity of -108.38%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

FLEX vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FLEX

3.33%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
18.22%
Q3
10.34%
Median
7.81%
Q1
3.28%
Min
-4.57%

FLEX’s Net Profit Margin of 3.33% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

TTWO

-64.26%

Entertainment Industry

Max
45.33%
Q3
29.05%
Median
15.14%
Q1
4.44%
Min
-21.70%

TTWO has a negative Net Profit Margin of -64.26%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

FLEX vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FLEX

4.73%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
26.64%
Q3
15.10%
Median
9.55%
Q1
4.57%
Min
-7.07%

FLEX’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.73% is around the midpoint for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

TTWO

-64.10%

Entertainment Industry

Max
43.42%
Q3
28.90%
Median
18.77%
Q1
9.11%
Min
-4.88%

TTWO has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -64.10%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

FLEX vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFLEXTTWO
Return on Equity (TTM)16.77%-108.38%
Return on Assets (TTM)4.59%-38.41%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)3.33%-64.26%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)4.73%-64.10%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)9.14%56.70%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FLEX

1.30

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
5.52
Q3
3.20
Median
2.02
Q1
1.51
Min
0.33

FLEX’s Current Ratio of 1.30 falls into the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

TTWO

1.15

Entertainment Industry

Max
6.76
Q3
4.06
Median
1.58
Q1
0.87
Min
0.38

TTWO’s Current Ratio of 1.15 aligns with the median group of the Entertainment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

FLEX vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FLEX

0.74

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
1.12
Q3
0.55
Median
0.33
Q1
0.10
Min
0.00

FLEX’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.74. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

TTWO

0.89

Entertainment Industry

Max
1.54
Q3
0.80
Median
0.15
Q1
0.01
Min
0.00

TTWO’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Entertainment industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.89. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

FLEX vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FLEX

7.39

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
114.40
Q3
51.32
Median
14.03
Q1
3.74
Min
-61.15

FLEX’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.39 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

TTWO

-44.74

Entertainment Industry

Max
62.11
Q3
35.59
Median
7.06
Q1
1.13
Min
-44.74

TTWO has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -44.74. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

FLEX vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFLEXTTWO
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.301.15
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.791.05
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.740.89
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)7.39-44.74

Growth

Revenue Growth

FLEX vs. TTWO: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FLEX vs. TTWO: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FLEX

0.00%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
5.16%
Q3
2.39%
Median
1.18%
Q1
0.12%
Min
0.00%

FLEX currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

TTWO

0.00%

Entertainment Industry

Max
2.71%
Q3
1.23%
Median
0.60%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TTWO currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

FLEX vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FLEX

0.00%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
197.57%
Q3
87.33%
Median
36.23%
Q1
3.99%
Min
0.00%

FLEX has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

TTWO

0.00%

Entertainment Industry

Max
82.30%
Q3
37.50%
Median
24.18%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TTWO has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

FLEX vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFLEXTTWO
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FLEX

25.16

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
71.05
Q3
42.87
Median
27.84
Q1
19.17
Min
7.73

FLEX’s P/E Ratio of 25.16 is within the middle range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

TTWO

--

Entertainment Industry

Max
80.06
Q3
53.00
Median
28.44
Q1
18.00
Min
2.61

P/E Ratio data for TTWO is currently unavailable.

FLEX vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FLEX

0.84

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
7.81
Q3
4.01
Median
2.09
Q1
1.25
Min
0.16

In the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, FLEX’s P/S Ratio of 0.84 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

TTWO

6.98

Entertainment Industry

Max
10.86
Q3
6.98
Median
4.25
Q1
2.56
Min
0.51

TTWO’s P/S Ratio of 6.98 aligns with the market consensus for the Entertainment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

FLEX vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FLEX

2.53

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
7.49
Q3
4.09
Median
2.35
Q1
1.55
Min
0.44

FLEX’s P/B Ratio of 2.53 is within the conventional range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

TTWO

13.89

Entertainment Industry

Max
19.63
Q3
10.35
Median
5.18
Q1
2.07
Min
0.59

TTWO’s P/B Ratio of 13.89 is in the upper tier for the Entertainment industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

FLEX vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFLEXTTWO
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)25.16--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.846.98
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.5313.89
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)18.50135.12