Seek Returns logo

FLEX vs. RBLX: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at FLEX and RBLX, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolFLEXRBLX
Company NameFlex Ltd.Roblox Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyCommunication Services
GICS IndustryElectronic Equipment, Instruments & ComponentsEntertainment
Market Capitalization18.36 billion USD82.14 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateMarch 18, 1994March 10, 2021
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FLEX and RBLX by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FLEX vs. RBLX: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFLEXRBLX
5-Day Price Return-0.69%-5.42%
13-Week Price Return17.60%45.91%
26-Week Price Return15.83%80.82%
52-Week Price Return53.58%189.99%
Month-to-Date Return-1.54%-14.01%
Year-to-Date Return27.90%104.79%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.67M9.46M
3-Month Avg. Volume4.25M8.77M
3-Month Volatility30.02%47.53%
Beta1.171.64

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FLEX

16.77%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
29.99%
Q3
15.78%
Median
9.05%
Q1
5.63%
Min
-9.55%

In the upper quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, FLEX’s Return on Equity of 16.77% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

RBLX

-354.27%

Entertainment Industry

Max
42.50%
Q3
22.75%
Median
12.88%
Q1
7.15%
Min
-6.84%

RBLX has a negative Return on Equity of -354.27%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

FLEX vs. RBLX: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FLEX

3.42%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
25.55%
Q3
12.80%
Median
7.58%
Q1
3.09%
Min
-8.70%

FLEX’s Net Profit Margin of 3.42% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

RBLX

-23.67%

Entertainment Industry

Max
45.25%
Q3
23.93%
Median
14.60%
Q1
4.89%
Min
-22.94%

RBLX has a negative Net Profit Margin of -23.67%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

FLEX vs. RBLX: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FLEX

4.78%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
30.04%
Q3
16.04%
Median
9.75%
Q1
4.27%
Min
-12.63%

FLEX’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.78% is around the midpoint for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

RBLX

-27.35%

Entertainment Industry

Max
46.83%
Q3
28.87%
Median
15.26%
Q1
8.95%
Min
-5.53%

RBLX has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -27.35%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

FLEX vs. RBLX: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFLEXRBLX
Return on Equity (TTM)16.77%-354.27%
Return on Assets (TTM)4.59%-13.06%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)3.42%-23.67%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)4.78%-27.35%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)8.94%78.01%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FLEX

1.30

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
4.43
Q3
2.88
Median
2.05
Q1
1.52
Min
0.64

FLEX’s Current Ratio of 1.30 falls into the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

RBLX

0.97

Entertainment Industry

Max
6.80
Q3
3.77
Median
1.87
Q1
0.86
Min
0.39

RBLX’s Current Ratio of 0.97 aligns with the median group of the Entertainment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

FLEX vs. RBLX: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FLEX

0.74

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
1.14
Q3
0.54
Median
0.34
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

FLEX’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.74. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

RBLX

2.85

Entertainment Industry

Max
1.65
Q3
0.71
Median
0.14
Q1
0.04
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.85, RBLX operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Entertainment industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

FLEX vs. RBLX: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FLEX

7.39

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
101.00
Q3
43.88
Median
13.27
Q1
3.73
Min
-18.73

FLEX’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.39 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

RBLX

-845.00

Entertainment Industry

Max
62.11
Q3
31.19
Median
7.50
Q1
2.02
Min
-6.33

RBLX has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -845.00. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

FLEX vs. RBLX: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFLEXRBLX
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.300.97
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.790.96
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.742.85
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)7.39-845.00

Growth

Revenue Growth

FLEX vs. RBLX: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FLEX vs. RBLX: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FLEX

0.00%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
4.86%
Q3
2.53%
Median
1.28%
Q1
0.16%
Min
0.00%

FLEX currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

RBLX

0.00%

Entertainment Industry

Max
2.54%
Q3
1.29%
Median
0.61%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

RBLX currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

FLEX vs. RBLX: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FLEX

0.00%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
161.37%
Q3
67.12%
Median
34.46%
Q1
3.82%
Min
0.00%

FLEX has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

RBLX

0.00%

Entertainment Industry

Max
82.30%
Q3
45.76%
Median
29.16%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

RBLX has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

FLEX vs. RBLX: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFLEXRBLX
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FLEX

20.58

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
73.87
Q3
41.11
Median
25.31
Q1
18.58
Min
8.59

FLEX’s P/E Ratio of 20.58 is within the middle range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

RBLX

--

Entertainment Industry

Max
53.51
Q3
45.31
Median
33.16
Q1
18.21
Min
3.89

P/E Ratio data for RBLX is currently unavailable.

FLEX vs. RBLX: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FLEX

0.70

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.74
Q3
3.49
Median
2.03
Q1
1.16
Min
0.11

In the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, FLEX’s P/S Ratio of 0.70 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

RBLX

20.42

Entertainment Industry

Max
12.81
Q3
7.20
Median
4.68
Q1
3.32
Min
0.79

With a P/S Ratio of 20.42, RBLX trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Entertainment industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

FLEX vs. RBLX: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FLEX

2.53

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.45
Q3
3.49
Median
1.98
Q1
1.31
Min
0.35

FLEX’s P/B Ratio of 2.53 is within the conventional range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

RBLX

202.01

Entertainment Industry

Max
17.11
Q3
8.38
Median
5.24
Q1
2.18
Min
0.67

At 202.01, RBLX’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Entertainment industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

FLEX vs. RBLX: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFLEXRBLX
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)20.58--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.7020.42
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.53202.01
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)16.6187.21