Seek Returns logo

FLEX vs. JBL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at FLEX and JBL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolFLEXJBL
Company NameFlex Ltd.Jabil Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS IndustryElectronic Equipment, Instruments & ComponentsElectronic Equipment, Instruments & Components
Market Capitalization19.81 billion USD22.41 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateMarch 18, 1994May 3, 1993
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FLEX and JBL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FLEX vs. JBL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFLEXJBL
5-Day Price Return6.45%1.33%
13-Week Price Return27.85%26.49%
26-Week Price Return24.81%23.51%
52-Week Price Return67.87%94.92%
Month-to-Date Return6.24%-6.42%
Year-to-Date Return38.00%45.13%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.52M1.42M
3-Month Avg. Volume4.25M1.35M
3-Month Volatility31.01%32.82%
Beta1.171.27

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FLEX

16.77%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
29.99%
Q3
15.78%
Median
9.05%
Q1
5.63%
Min
-9.55%

In the upper quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, FLEX’s Return on Equity of 16.77% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

JBL

38.64%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
29.99%
Q3
15.78%
Median
9.05%
Q1
5.63%
Min
-9.55%

JBL’s Return on Equity of 38.64% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

FLEX vs. JBL: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FLEX

3.42%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
25.55%
Q3
12.80%
Median
7.58%
Q1
3.09%
Min
-8.70%

FLEX’s Net Profit Margin of 3.42% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

JBL

2.02%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
25.55%
Q3
12.80%
Median
7.58%
Q1
3.09%
Min
-8.70%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, JBL’s Net Profit Margin of 2.02% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

FLEX vs. JBL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FLEX

4.78%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
30.04%
Q3
16.04%
Median
9.75%
Q1
4.27%
Min
-12.63%

FLEX’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.78% is around the midpoint for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

JBL

4.08%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
30.04%
Q3
16.04%
Median
9.75%
Q1
4.27%
Min
-12.63%

JBL’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.08% is in the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

FLEX vs. JBL: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFLEXJBL
Return on Equity (TTM)16.77%38.64%
Return on Assets (TTM)4.59%3.25%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)3.42%2.02%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)4.78%4.08%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)8.94%8.86%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FLEX

1.30

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
4.43
Q3
2.88
Median
2.05
Q1
1.52
Min
0.64

FLEX’s Current Ratio of 1.30 falls into the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

JBL

0.98

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
4.43
Q3
2.88
Median
2.05
Q1
1.52
Min
0.64

JBL’s Current Ratio of 0.98 falls into the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

FLEX vs. JBL: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FLEX

0.74

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
1.14
Q3
0.54
Median
0.34
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

FLEX’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.74. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

JBL

2.24

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
1.14
Q3
0.54
Median
0.34
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.24, JBL operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

FLEX vs. JBL: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FLEX

7.39

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
101.00
Q3
43.88
Median
13.27
Q1
3.73
Min
-18.73

FLEX’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.39 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

JBL

11.12

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
101.00
Q3
43.88
Median
13.27
Q1
3.73
Min
-18.73

JBL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 11.12 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

FLEX vs. JBL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFLEXJBL
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.300.98
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.790.47
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.742.24
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)7.3911.12

Growth

Revenue Growth

FLEX vs. JBL: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FLEX vs. JBL: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FLEX

0.00%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
4.86%
Q3
2.53%
Median
1.28%
Q1
0.16%
Min
0.00%

FLEX currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

JBL

0.17%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
4.86%
Q3
2.53%
Median
1.28%
Q1
0.16%
Min
0.00%

JBL’s Dividend Yield of 0.17% is consistent with its peers in the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

FLEX vs. JBL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FLEX

0.00%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
161.37%
Q3
67.12%
Median
34.46%
Q1
3.82%
Min
0.00%

FLEX has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

JBL

6.59%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
161.37%
Q3
67.12%
Median
34.46%
Q1
3.82%
Min
0.00%

JBL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 6.59% is within the typical range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

FLEX vs. JBL: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFLEXJBL
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.17%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%6.59%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FLEX

20.58

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
73.87
Q3
41.11
Median
25.31
Q1
18.58
Min
8.59

FLEX’s P/E Ratio of 20.58 is within the middle range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

JBL

37.97

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
73.87
Q3
41.11
Median
25.31
Q1
18.58
Min
8.59

JBL’s P/E Ratio of 37.97 is within the middle range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

FLEX vs. JBL: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FLEX

0.70

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.74
Q3
3.49
Median
2.03
Q1
1.16
Min
0.11

In the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, FLEX’s P/S Ratio of 0.70 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

JBL

0.77

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.74
Q3
3.49
Median
2.03
Q1
1.16
Min
0.11

In the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, JBL’s P/S Ratio of 0.77 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

FLEX vs. JBL: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FLEX

2.53

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.45
Q3
3.49
Median
1.98
Q1
1.31
Min
0.35

FLEX’s P/B Ratio of 2.53 is within the conventional range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

JBL

14.04

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.45
Q3
3.49
Median
1.98
Q1
1.31
Min
0.35

At 14.04, JBL’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

FLEX vs. JBL: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFLEXJBL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)20.5837.97
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.700.77
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.5314.04
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)16.6118.82