Seek Returns logo

FL vs. LULU: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at FL and LULU, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolFLLULU
Company NameFoot Locker, Inc.lululemon athletica inc.
CountryUnited StatesCanada
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustrySpecialty RetailTextiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods
Market Capitalization2.48 billion USD24.03 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateJanuary 2, 1962July 27, 2007
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FL and LULU by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FL vs. LULU: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFLLULU
5-Day Price Return3.79%4.89%
13-Week Price Return95.78%-34.09%
26-Week Price Return37.20%-51.32%
52-Week Price Return-16.40%-16.36%
Month-to-Date Return3.83%-0.02%
Year-to-Date Return19.49%-47.57%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.82M3.40M
3-Month Avg. Volume5.09M3.04M
3-Month Volatility170.26%53.70%
Beta1.901.10

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FL

-12.73%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
61.19%
Q3
37.24%
Median
18.81%
Q1
8.92%
Min
-13.03%

FL has a negative Return on Equity of -12.73%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

LULU

43.48%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
53.33%
Q3
26.13%
Median
18.47%
Q1
7.99%
Min
-10.49%

In the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, LULU’s Return on Equity of 43.48% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

FL vs. LULU: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FL

-4.54%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
21.28%
Q3
10.68%
Median
6.08%
Q1
2.43%
Min
-4.54%

FL has a negative Net Profit Margin of -4.54%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

LULU

16.82%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
23.35%
Q3
13.49%
Median
8.45%
Q1
4.18%
Min
-3.90%

A Net Profit Margin of 16.82% places LULU in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

FL vs. LULU: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FL

-2.39%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
33.35%
Q3
15.84%
Median
9.34%
Q1
3.83%
Min
-8.97%

FL has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -2.39%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

LULU

23.36%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
29.47%
Q3
20.87%
Median
13.00%
Q1
7.02%
Min
-3.59%

An Operating Profit Margin of 23.36% places LULU in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

FL vs. LULU: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFLLULU
Return on Equity (TTM)-12.73%43.48%
Return on Assets (TTM)-5.29%25.05%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-4.54%16.82%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-2.39%23.36%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)29.00%59.34%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FL

1.64

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
2.83
Q3
1.89
Median
1.39
Q1
1.11
Min
0.64

FL’s Current Ratio of 1.64 aligns with the median group of the Specialty Retail industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

LULU

2.28

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
3.91
Q3
2.49
Median
1.89
Q1
1.43
Min
0.80

LULU’s Current Ratio of 2.28 aligns with the median group of the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

FL vs. LULU: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Specialty Retail and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FL

0.17

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
3.02
Q3
1.57
Median
0.64
Q1
0.20
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Specialty Retail industry, FL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.17 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

LULU

0.00

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
2.67
Q3
1.29
Median
0.59
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, LULU’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

FL vs. LULU: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Specialty Retail and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FL

2.13

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
48.12
Q3
35.95
Median
14.13
Q1
3.61
Min
-36.00

In the lower quartile for the Specialty Retail industry, FL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.13 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

LULU

-47.83

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
57.00
Q3
35.85
Median
9.20
Q1
4.29
Min
-32.49

LULU has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -47.83. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

FL vs. LULU: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFLLULU
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.642.28
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.490.98
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.170.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)2.13-47.83

Growth

Revenue Growth

FL vs. LULU: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FL vs. LULU: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FL

0.00%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
6.53%
Q3
2.69%
Median
1.08%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FL currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

LULU

0.00%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
6.59%
Q3
3.60%
Median
2.59%
Q1
0.95%
Min
0.00%

LULU currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

FL vs. LULU: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FL

136.14%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
165.81%
Q3
80.94%
Median
31.61%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 136.14% is in the upper quartile for the Specialty Retail industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

LULU

0.00%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
195.44%
Q3
106.47%
Median
58.77%
Q1
36.52%
Min
0.00%

LULU has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

FL vs. LULU: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFLLULU
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)136.14%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FL

--

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
48.56
Q3
29.15
Median
22.00
Q1
15.46
Min
7.95

P/E Ratio data for FL is currently unavailable.

LULU

13.38

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
63.29
Q3
34.64
Median
18.01
Q1
13.88
Min
6.04

In the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, LULU’s P/E Ratio of 13.38 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

FL vs. LULU: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FL

0.31

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
5.08
Q3
2.69
Median
1.23
Q1
0.48
Min
0.09

In the lower quartile for the Specialty Retail industry, FL’s P/S Ratio of 0.31 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

LULU

2.25

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
5.46
Q3
3.13
Median
1.72
Q1
0.83
Min
0.26

LULU’s P/S Ratio of 2.25 aligns with the market consensus for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

FL vs. LULU: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FL

0.44

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
16.93
Q3
7.98
Median
3.69
Q1
1.79
Min
0.21

FL’s P/B Ratio of 0.44 is in the lower quartile for the Specialty Retail industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

LULU

7.80

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
9.76
Q3
6.00
Median
3.26
Q1
1.97
Min
0.69

LULU’s P/B Ratio of 7.80 is in the upper tier for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

FL vs. LULU: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Specialty Retail and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFLLULU
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--13.38
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.312.25
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)0.447.80
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)12.0515.24