Seek Returns logo

FIZZ vs. MNST: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at FIZZ and MNST, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolFIZZMNST
Company NameNational Beverage Corp.Monster Beverage Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer StaplesConsumer Staples
GICS IndustryBeveragesBeverages
Market Capitalization3.46 billion USD65.51 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGS
Listing DateSeptember 13, 1991December 9, 1985
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FIZZ and MNST by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FIZZ vs. MNST: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFIZZMNST
5-Day Price Return0.08%-0.33%
13-Week Price Return-20.79%6.75%
26-Week Price Return-12.69%13.63%
52-Week Price Return-18.27%33.35%
Month-to-Date Return0.08%-0.33%
Year-to-Date Return-13.41%27.64%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.26M4.19M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.20M5.76M
3-Month Volatility26.72%24.14%
Beta0.520.49

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FIZZ

43.50%

Beverages Industry

Max
45.90%
Q3
22.74%
Median
10.10%
Q1
6.35%
Min
-13.21%

In the upper quartile for the Beverages industry, FIZZ’s Return on Equity of 43.50% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

MNST

24.73%

Beverages Industry

Max
45.90%
Q3
22.74%
Median
10.10%
Q1
6.35%
Min
-13.21%

In the upper quartile for the Beverages industry, MNST’s Return on Equity of 24.73% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

FIZZ vs. MNST: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Beverages industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FIZZ

15.45%

Beverages Industry

Max
21.38%
Q3
12.24%
Median
8.43%
Q1
5.97%
Min
0.65%

A Net Profit Margin of 15.45% places FIZZ in the upper quartile for the Beverages industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

MNST

20.54%

Beverages Industry

Max
21.38%
Q3
12.24%
Median
8.43%
Q1
5.97%
Min
0.65%

A Net Profit Margin of 20.54% places MNST in the upper quartile for the Beverages industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

FIZZ vs. MNST: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Beverages industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FIZZ

19.69%

Beverages Industry

Max
29.32%
Q3
20.15%
Median
13.14%
Q1
10.74%
Min
1.24%

FIZZ’s Operating Profit Margin of 19.69% is around the midpoint for the Beverages industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

MNST

26.93%

Beverages Industry

Max
29.32%
Q3
20.15%
Median
13.14%
Q1
10.74%
Min
1.24%

An Operating Profit Margin of 26.93% places MNST in the upper quartile for the Beverages industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

FIZZ vs. MNST: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Beverages industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFIZZMNST
Return on Equity (TTM)43.50%24.73%
Return on Assets (TTM)29.01%19.23%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)15.45%20.54%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)19.69%26.93%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)37.17%55.18%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FIZZ

3.24

Beverages Industry

Max
3.52
Q3
2.00
Median
1.22
Q1
0.87
Min
0.55

FIZZ’s Current Ratio of 3.24 is in the upper quartile for the Beverages industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

MNST

3.52

Beverages Industry

Max
3.52
Q3
2.00
Median
1.22
Q1
0.87
Min
0.55

MNST’s Current Ratio of 3.52 is in the upper quartile for the Beverages industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

FIZZ vs. MNST: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Beverages industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FIZZ

0.00

Beverages Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
1.14
Median
0.74
Q1
0.37
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Beverages industry, FIZZ’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

MNST

0.00

Beverages Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
1.14
Median
0.74
Q1
0.37
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Beverages industry, MNST’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

FIZZ vs. MNST: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Beverages industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FIZZ

1,039.00

Beverages Industry

Max
78.96
Q3
42.68
Median
10.96
Q1
3.86
Min
0.81

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 1,039.00, FIZZ demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Beverages industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

MNST

123.81

Beverages Industry

Max
78.96
Q3
42.68
Median
10.96
Q1
3.86
Min
0.81

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 123.81, MNST demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Beverages industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

FIZZ vs. MNST: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Beverages industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFIZZMNST
Current Ratio (MRQ)3.243.52
Quick Ratio (MRQ)2.432.86
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.000.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)1,039.00123.81

Growth

Revenue Growth

FIZZ vs. MNST: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FIZZ vs. MNST: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FIZZ

0.00%

Beverages Industry

Max
7.92%
Q3
4.37%
Median
3.32%
Q1
1.98%
Min
0.00%

FIZZ currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

MNST

0.00%

Beverages Industry

Max
7.92%
Q3
4.37%
Median
3.32%
Q1
1.98%
Min
0.00%

MNST currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

FIZZ vs. MNST: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Beverages industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FIZZ

535.66%

Beverages Industry

Max
188.65%
Q3
104.55%
Median
72.60%
Q1
40.31%
Min
0.00%

At 535.66%, FIZZ’s Dividend Payout Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical range for the Beverages industry. While this provides a significant return to shareholders, it may limit funds for reinvestment and could be difficult to sustain.

MNST

0.00%

Beverages Industry

Max
188.65%
Q3
104.55%
Median
72.60%
Q1
40.31%
Min
0.00%

MNST has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

FIZZ vs. MNST: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Beverages industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFIZZMNST
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)535.66%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FIZZ

18.99

Beverages Industry

Max
35.25
Q3
22.66
Median
17.17
Q1
13.65
Min
4.77

FIZZ’s P/E Ratio of 18.99 is within the middle range for the Beverages industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

MNST

41.68

Beverages Industry

Max
35.25
Q3
22.66
Median
17.17
Q1
13.65
Min
4.77

At 41.68, MNST’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Beverages industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

FIZZ vs. MNST: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Beverages industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FIZZ

2.93

Beverages Industry

Max
4.06
Q3
2.24
Median
1.34
Q1
0.86
Min
0.39

FIZZ’s P/S Ratio of 2.93 is in the upper echelon for the Beverages industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

MNST

8.56

Beverages Industry

Max
4.06
Q3
2.24
Median
1.34
Q1
0.86
Min
0.39

With a P/S Ratio of 8.56, MNST trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Beverages industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

FIZZ vs. MNST: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Beverages industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FIZZ

8.73

Beverages Industry

Max
6.90
Q3
4.23
Median
2.20
Q1
1.51
Min
0.69

At 8.73, FIZZ’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Beverages industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

MNST

8.49

Beverages Industry

Max
6.90
Q3
4.23
Median
2.20
Q1
1.51
Min
0.69

At 8.49, MNST’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Beverages industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

FIZZ vs. MNST: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Beverages industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFIZZMNST
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)18.9941.68
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.938.56
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)8.738.49
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)20.4435.36