Seek Returns logo

FITB vs. WF: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at FITB and WF, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

FITB is a standard domestic listing, while WF trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolFITBWF
Company NameFifth Third BancorpWoori Financial Group Inc.
CountryUnited StatesSouth Korea
GICS SectorFinancialsFinancials
GICS IndustryBanksBanks
Market Capitalization28.04 billion USD13.09 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980October 1, 2003
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FITB and WF by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FITB vs. WF: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFITBWF
5-Day Price Return-3.03%-2.80%
13-Week Price Return-3.73%2.36%
26-Week Price Return4.48%45.94%
52-Week Price Return-11.11%5.12%
Month-to-Date Return-0.82%2.56%
Year-to-Date Return-2.37%69.49%
10-Day Avg. Volume7.16M2.17M
3-Month Avg. Volume6.39M1.83M
3-Month Volatility24.95%26.39%
Beta1.010.84

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FITB

11.73%

Banks Industry

Max
25.75%
Q3
15.51%
Median
11.91%
Q1
8.65%
Min
-1.41%

FITB’s Return on Equity of 11.73% is on par with the norm for the Banks industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

WF

8.49%

Banks Industry

Max
25.75%
Q3
15.51%
Median
11.91%
Q1
8.65%
Min
-1.41%

WF’s Return on Equity of 8.49% is in the lower quartile for the Banks industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

FITB vs. WF: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Banks industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FITB

28.85%

Banks Industry

Max
54.20%
Q3
35.60%
Median
28.95%
Q1
22.27%
Min
2.66%

FITB’s Net Profit Margin of 28.85% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Banks industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

WF

19.91%

Banks Industry

Max
54.20%
Q3
35.60%
Median
28.95%
Q1
22.27%
Min
2.66%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Banks industry, WF’s Net Profit Margin of 19.91% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

FITB vs. WF: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Banks industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FITB

36.71%

Banks Industry

Max
63.35%
Q3
44.30%
Median
37.14%
Q1
28.21%
Min
12.28%

FITB’s Operating Profit Margin of 36.71% is around the midpoint for the Banks industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

WF

26.81%

Banks Industry

Max
63.35%
Q3
44.30%
Median
37.14%
Q1
28.21%
Min
12.28%

WF’s Operating Profit Margin of 26.81% is in the lower quartile for the Banks industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

FITB vs. WF: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Banks industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFITBWF
Return on Equity (TTM)11.73%8.49%
Return on Assets (TTM)1.14%0.54%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)28.85%19.91%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)36.71%26.81%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)----

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FITB

--

Banks Industry

Max
--
Q3
--
Median
--
Q1
--
Min
--

For the Banks industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

WF

--

Banks Industry

Max
--
Q3
--
Median
--
Q1
--
Min
--

For the Banks industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

FITB vs. WF: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Banks industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FITB

0.67

Banks Industry

Max
5.78
Q3
2.55
Median
0.94
Q1
0.39
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Banks industry.

WF

2.50

Banks Industry

Max
5.78
Q3
2.55
Median
0.94
Q1
0.39
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Banks industry.

FITB vs. WF: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Banks industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FITB

--

Banks Industry

Max
--
Q3
--
Median
--
Q1
--
Min
--

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Banks industry.

WF

--

Banks Industry

Max
--
Q3
--
Median
--
Q1
--
Min
--

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Banks industry.

FITB vs. WF: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Banks industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFITBWF
Current Ratio (MRQ)----
Quick Ratio (MRQ)----
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.672.50
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)----

Growth

Revenue Growth

FITB vs. WF: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FITB vs. WF: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FITB

4.18%

Banks Industry

Max
9.92%
Q3
5.44%
Median
3.78%
Q1
2.38%
Min
0.00%

FITB’s Dividend Yield of 4.18% is consistent with its peers in the Banks industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

WF

4.74%

Banks Industry

Max
9.92%
Q3
5.44%
Median
3.78%
Q1
2.38%
Min
0.00%

WF’s Dividend Yield of 4.74% is consistent with its peers in the Banks industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

FITB vs. WF: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Banks industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FITB

47.89%

Banks Industry

Max
135.42%
Q3
78.13%
Median
52.54%
Q1
35.48%
Min
0.00%

FITB’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 47.89% is within the typical range for the Banks industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

WF

39.77%

Banks Industry

Max
135.42%
Q3
78.13%
Median
52.54%
Q1
35.48%
Min
0.00%

WF’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 39.77% is within the typical range for the Banks industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

FITB vs. WF: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Banks industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFITBWF
Dividend Yield (TTM)4.18%4.74%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)47.89%39.77%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FITB

11.46

Banks Industry

Max
21.36
Q3
13.70
Median
10.55
Q1
8.08
Min
2.84

FITB’s P/E Ratio of 11.46 is within the middle range for the Banks industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

WF

6.59

Banks Industry

Max
21.36
Q3
13.70
Median
10.55
Q1
8.08
Min
2.84

In the lower quartile for the Banks industry, WF’s P/E Ratio of 6.59 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

FITB vs. WF: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Banks industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FITB

2.09

Banks Industry

Max
4.90
Q3
2.97
Median
2.24
Q1
1.58
Min
0.45

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Banks industry.

WF

0.62

Banks Industry

Max
4.90
Q3
2.97
Median
2.24
Q1
1.58
Min
0.45

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Banks industry.

FITB vs. WF: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Banks industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FITB

1.40

Banks Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
1.43
Median
1.13
Q1
0.87
Min
0.25

FITB’s P/B Ratio of 1.40 is within the conventional range for the Banks industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

WF

0.48

Banks Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
1.43
Median
1.13
Q1
0.87
Min
0.25

WF’s P/B Ratio of 0.48 is in the lower quartile for the Banks industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

FITB vs. WF: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Banks industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFITBWF
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)11.466.59
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.090.62
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.400.48
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)8.7311.24