Seek Returns logo

FITB vs. RKT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at FITB and RKT, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolFITBRKT
Company NameFifth Third BancorpRocket Companies, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorFinancialsFinancials
GICS IndustryBanksFinancial Services
Market Capitalization29.39 billion USD37.57 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980August 6, 2020
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FITB and RKT by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FITB vs. RKT: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFITBRKT
5-Day Price Return-2.18%-11.62%
13-Week Price Return2.33%25.00%
26-Week Price Return13.29%47.47%
52-Week Price Return5.79%-5.57%
Month-to-Date Return-0.31%-8.15%
Year-to-Date Return5.04%58.08%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.73M54.67M
3-Month Avg. Volume4.79M23.35M
3-Month Volatility17.84%62.30%
Beta1.052.33

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FITB

11.40%

Banks Industry

Max
25.40%
Q3
15.55%
Median
12.00%
Q1
8.98%
Min
-0.10%

FITB’s Return on Equity of 11.40% is on par with the norm for the Banks industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

RKT

-0.01%

Financial Services Industry

Max
39.28%
Q3
18.88%
Median
9.97%
Q1
4.03%
Min
-10.25%

RKT has a negative Return on Equity of -0.01%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

FITB vs. RKT: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FITB

28.85%

Banks Industry

Max
54.20%
Q3
35.73%
Median
28.97%
Q1
22.56%
Min
6.98%

FITB’s Net Profit Margin of 28.85% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Banks industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

RKT

-0.01%

Financial Services Industry

Max
52.16%
Q3
25.35%
Median
12.68%
Q1
6.11%
Min
-11.69%

RKT has a negative Net Profit Margin of -0.01%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

FITB vs. RKT: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FITB

36.71%

Banks Industry

Max
63.35%
Q3
44.73%
Median
37.24%
Q1
28.25%
Min
12.28%

FITB’s Operating Profit Margin of 36.71% is around the midpoint for the Banks industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

RKT

13.77%

Financial Services Industry

Max
75.57%
Q3
37.78%
Median
19.09%
Q1
10.04%
Min
-19.42%

RKT’s Operating Profit Margin of 13.77% is around the midpoint for the Financial Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

FITB vs. RKT: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFITBRKT
Return on Equity (TTM)11.40%-0.01%
Return on Assets (TTM)1.10%0.00%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)28.85%-0.01%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)36.71%13.77%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)----

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FITB

--

Banks Industry

Max
--
Q3
--
Median
--
Q1
--
Min
--

For the Banks industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

RKT

0.40

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.83
Q3
2.70
Median
1.44
Q1
0.86
Min
0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

FITB vs. RKT: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FITB

0.86

Banks Industry

Max
5.78
Q3
2.66
Median
1.05
Q1
0.40
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Banks industry.

RKT

2.69

Financial Services Industry

Max
5.07
Q3
2.14
Median
0.66
Q1
0.12
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

FITB vs. RKT: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FITB

--

Banks Industry

Max
--
Q3
--
Median
--
Q1
--
Min
--

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Banks industry.

RKT

2.42

Financial Services Industry

Max
136.23
Q3
56.08
Median
6.55
Q1
2.01
Min
-33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

FITB vs. RKT: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFITBRKT
Current Ratio (MRQ)--0.40
Quick Ratio (MRQ)--0.40
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.862.69
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)--2.42

Growth

Revenue Growth

FITB vs. RKT: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FITB vs. RKT: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FITB

4.08%

Banks Industry

Max
11.03%
Q3
6.00%
Median
3.87%
Q1
2.41%
Min
0.00%

FITB’s Dividend Yield of 4.08% is consistent with its peers in the Banks industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

RKT

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max
8.12%
Q3
3.37%
Median
1.70%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

RKT currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

FITB vs. RKT: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FITB

50.94%

Banks Industry

Max
134.24%
Q3
79.39%
Median
55.09%
Q1
36.09%
Min
0.00%

FITB’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 50.94% is within the typical range for the Banks industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

RKT

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max
132.10%
Q3
64.32%
Median
18.23%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

RKT has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

FITB vs. RKT: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFITBRKT
Dividend Yield (TTM)4.08%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)50.94%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FITB

12.48

Banks Industry

Max
22.69
Q3
13.75
Median
10.32
Q1
7.73
Min
2.59

FITB’s P/E Ratio of 12.48 is within the middle range for the Banks industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

RKT

--

Financial Services Industry

Max
45.81
Q3
30.21
Median
16.29
Q1
10.14
Min
0.70

P/E Ratio data for RKT is currently unavailable.

FITB vs. RKT: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FITB

2.09

Banks Industry

Max
4.90
Q3
2.98
Median
2.24
Q1
1.59
Min
0.45

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Banks industry.

RKT

9.85

Financial Services Industry

Max
10.88
Q3
5.34
Median
2.64
Q1
1.24
Min
0.06

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

FITB vs. RKT: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FITB

1.30

Banks Industry

Max
2.09
Q3
1.40
Median
1.11
Q1
0.86
Min
0.29

FITB’s P/B Ratio of 1.30 is within the conventional range for the Banks industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

RKT

3.81

Financial Services Industry

Max
7.93
Q3
3.78
Median
1.49
Q1
0.88
Min
0.08

RKT’s P/B Ratio of 3.81 is in the upper tier for the Financial Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

FITB vs. RKT: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFITBRKT
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)12.48--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.099.85
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.303.81
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)7.2427.80