Seek Returns logo

FIS vs. WDC: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at FIS and WDC, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolFISWDC
Company NameFidelity National Information Services, Inc.Western Digital Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorFinancialsInformation Technology
GICS IndustryFinancial ServicesTechnology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals
Market Capitalization38.01 billion USD26.54 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateJune 20, 2001October 31, 1978
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FIS and WDC by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FIS vs. WDC: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFISWDC
5-Day Price Return3.85%2.19%
13-Week Price Return-7.75%63.35%
26-Week Price Return-12.18%56.13%
52-Week Price Return-4.41%66.76%
Month-to-Date Return-8.36%-3.33%
Year-to-Date Return-9.90%68.83%
10-Day Avg. Volume4.81M8.37M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.64M7.49M
3-Month Volatility26.31%32.63%
Beta1.091.73

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FIS

0.73%

Financial Services Industry

Max
40.58%
Q3
20.06%
Median
10.67%
Q1
4.19%
Min
-10.31%

FIS’s Return on Equity of 0.73% is in the lower quartile for the Financial Services industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

WDC

21.49%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
47.24%
Q3
29.40%
Median
9.11%
Q1
6.06%
Min
-0.79%

WDC’s Return on Equity of 21.49% is on par with the norm for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

FIS vs. WDC: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FIS

1.09%

Financial Services Industry

Max
52.86%
Q3
25.58%
Median
12.23%
Q1
6.64%
Min
-9.92%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Financial Services industry, FIS’s Net Profit Margin of 1.09% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

WDC

14.23%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
13.86%
Q3
8.17%
Median
4.62%
Q1
3.65%
Min
-0.21%

WDC’s Net Profit Margin of 14.23% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

FIS vs. WDC: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FIS

17.58%

Financial Services Industry

Max
77.28%
Q3
37.68%
Median
18.17%
Q1
9.27%
Min
-8.19%

FIS’s Operating Profit Margin of 17.58% is around the midpoint for the Financial Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

WDC

22.85%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
17.80%
Q3
10.33%
Median
6.31%
Q1
4.86%
Min
2.53%

WDC’s Operating Profit Margin of 22.85% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

FIS vs. WDC: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFISWDC
Return on Equity (TTM)0.73%21.49%
Return on Assets (TTM)0.33%9.38%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)1.09%14.23%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)17.58%22.85%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)36.68%38.00%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FIS

0.59

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.58
Q3
2.59
Median
1.33
Q1
0.69
Min
0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

WDC

1.08

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
2.47
Q3
1.98
Median
1.40
Q1
1.26
Min
0.70

WDC’s Current Ratio of 1.08 falls into the lower quartile for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

FIS vs. WDC: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FIS

0.91

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.96
Q3
2.10
Median
0.57
Q1
0.12
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

WDC

0.85

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
1.47
Q3
0.93
Median
0.32
Q1
0.19
Min
0.00

WDC’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.85 is typical for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

FIS vs. WDC: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FIS

6.19

Financial Services Industry

Max
136.23
Q3
56.08
Median
6.55
Q1
2.01
Min
-33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

WDC

1.94

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
204.63
Q3
90.22
Median
21.70
Q1
6.79
Min
-23.93

In the lower quartile for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, WDC’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.94 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

FIS vs. WDC: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFISWDC
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.591.08
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.480.84
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.910.85
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)6.191.94

Growth

Revenue Growth

FIS vs. WDC: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FIS vs. WDC: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FIS

2.20%

Financial Services Industry

Max
8.18%
Q3
3.60%
Median
1.56%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FIS’s Dividend Yield of 2.20% is consistent with its peers in the Financial Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

WDC

0.00%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
4.50%
Q3
3.66%
Median
1.90%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

WDC currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

FIS vs. WDC: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FIS

101.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max
155.56%
Q3
63.71%
Median
18.08%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FIS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 101.00% is in the upper quartile for the Financial Services industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

WDC

15.60%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
142.87%
Q3
66.07%
Median
42.79%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

WDC’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 15.60% is within the typical range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

FIS vs. WDC: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFISWDC
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.20%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)101.00%15.60%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FIS

333.55

Financial Services Industry

Max
63.23
Q3
32.10
Median
14.41
Q1
10.81
Min
0.37

At 333.55, FIS’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Financial Services industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

WDC

13.66

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
43.16
Q3
27.56
Median
17.85
Q1
12.48
Min
6.21

WDC’s P/E Ratio of 13.66 is within the middle range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

FIS vs. WDC: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FIS

3.62

Financial Services Industry

Max
11.16
Q3
5.45
Median
2.61
Q1
1.25
Min
0.04

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

WDC

1.94

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
4.27
Q3
1.99
Median
0.93
Q1
0.45
Min
0.04

WDC’s P/S Ratio of 1.94 aligns with the market consensus for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

FIS vs. WDC: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FIS

3.02

Financial Services Industry

Max
7.09
Q3
3.79
Median
1.46
Q1
0.83
Min
0.04

FIS’s P/B Ratio of 3.02 is within the conventional range for the Financial Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

WDC

3.99

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
12.51
Q3
6.11
Median
1.73
Q1
1.01
Min
0.31

WDC’s P/B Ratio of 3.99 is within the conventional range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

FIS vs. WDC: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFISWDC
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)333.5513.66
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.621.94
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.023.99
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)20.4418.21