Seek Returns logo

FIS vs. UI: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at FIS and UI, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolFISUI
Company NameFidelity National Information Services, Inc.Ubiquiti Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorFinancialsInformation Technology
GICS IndustryFinancial ServicesCommunications Equipment
Market Capitalization38.01 billion USD29.31 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJune 20, 2001October 14, 2011
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FIS and UI by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FIS vs. UI: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFISUI
5-Day Price Return3.85%5.20%
13-Week Price Return-7.75%11.57%
26-Week Price Return-12.18%13.51%
52-Week Price Return-4.41%183.25%
Month-to-Date Return-8.36%11.25%
Year-to-Date Return-9.90%45.96%
10-Day Avg. Volume4.81M0.09M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.64M0.11M
3-Month Volatility26.31%41.50%
Beta1.091.41

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FIS

0.73%

Financial Services Industry

Max
40.58%
Q3
20.06%
Median
10.67%
Q1
4.19%
Min
-10.31%

FIS’s Return on Equity of 0.73% is in the lower quartile for the Financial Services industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

UI

217.64%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
32.05%
Q3
19.58%
Median
11.77%
Q1
2.23%
Min
-11.93%

UI’s Return on Equity of 217.64% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Communications Equipment industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

FIS vs. UI: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FIS

1.09%

Financial Services Industry

Max
52.86%
Q3
25.58%
Median
12.23%
Q1
6.64%
Min
-9.92%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Financial Services industry, FIS’s Net Profit Margin of 1.09% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

UI

23.64%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
23.65%
Q3
14.32%
Median
5.31%
Q1
1.45%
Min
-12.72%

A Net Profit Margin of 23.64% places UI in the upper quartile for the Communications Equipment industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

FIS vs. UI: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FIS

17.58%

Financial Services Industry

Max
77.28%
Q3
37.68%
Median
18.17%
Q1
9.27%
Min
-8.19%

FIS’s Operating Profit Margin of 17.58% is around the midpoint for the Financial Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

UI

30.71%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
42.27%
Q3
18.90%
Median
6.21%
Q1
2.97%
Min
-20.72%

An Operating Profit Margin of 30.71% places UI in the upper quartile for the Communications Equipment industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

FIS vs. UI: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFISUI
Return on Equity (TTM)0.73%217.64%
Return on Assets (TTM)0.33%45.81%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)1.09%23.64%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)17.58%30.71%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)36.68%42.16%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FIS

0.59

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.58
Q3
2.59
Median
1.33
Q1
0.69
Min
0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

UI

1.39

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
1.72
Q3
1.72
Median
1.46
Q1
1.18
Min
0.93

UI’s Current Ratio of 1.39 aligns with the median group of the Communications Equipment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

FIS vs. UI: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FIS

0.91

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.96
Q3
2.10
Median
0.57
Q1
0.12
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

UI

0.78

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
1.55
Q3
0.92
Median
0.55
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00

UI’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.78 is typical for the Communications Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

FIS vs. UI: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FIS

6.19

Financial Services Industry

Max
136.23
Q3
56.08
Median
6.55
Q1
2.01
Min
-33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

UI

6.64

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
181.73
Q3
113.63
Median
7.59
Q1
3.82
Min
-5.39

UI’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 6.64 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Communications Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

FIS vs. UI: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFISUI
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.591.39
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.480.56
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.910.78
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)6.196.64

Growth

Revenue Growth

FIS vs. UI: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FIS vs. UI: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FIS

2.20%

Financial Services Industry

Max
8.18%
Q3
3.60%
Median
1.56%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FIS’s Dividend Yield of 2.20% is consistent with its peers in the Financial Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

UI

0.49%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
3.88%
Q3
2.75%
Median
0.93%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

UI’s Dividend Yield of 0.49% is consistent with its peers in the Communications Equipment industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

FIS vs. UI: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FIS

101.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max
155.56%
Q3
63.71%
Median
18.08%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FIS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 101.00% is in the upper quartile for the Financial Services industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

UI

26.41%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
111.16%
Q3
55.91%
Median
28.42%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

UI’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 26.41% is within the typical range for the Communications Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

FIS vs. UI: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFISUI
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.20%0.49%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)101.00%26.41%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FIS

333.55

Financial Services Industry

Max
63.23
Q3
32.10
Median
14.41
Q1
10.81
Min
0.37

At 333.55, FIS’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Financial Services industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

UI

53.59

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
57.30
Q3
47.92
Median
27.50
Q1
17.89
Min
13.89

A P/E Ratio of 53.59 places UI in the upper quartile for the Communications Equipment industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

FIS vs. UI: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FIS

3.62

Financial Services Industry

Max
11.16
Q3
5.45
Median
2.61
Q1
1.25
Min
0.04

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

UI

12.67

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
11.03
Q3
5.53
Median
2.20
Q1
0.99
Min
0.40

With a P/S Ratio of 12.67, UI trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Communications Equipment industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

FIS vs. UI: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FIS

3.02

Financial Services Industry

Max
7.09
Q3
3.79
Median
1.46
Q1
0.83
Min
0.04

FIS’s P/B Ratio of 3.02 is within the conventional range for the Financial Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

UI

43.03

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
9.66
Q3
5.60
Median
3.73
Q1
2.67
Min
0.30

At 43.03, UI’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Communications Equipment industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

FIS vs. UI: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFISUI
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)333.5553.59
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.6212.67
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.0243.03
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)20.4440.16