Seek Returns logo

FIS vs. SONY: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at FIS and SONY, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

FIS is a standard domestic listing, while SONY trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolFISSONY
Company NameFidelity National Information Services, Inc.Sony Group Corporation
CountryUnited StatesJapan
GICS SectorFinancialsConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryFinancial ServicesHousehold Durables
Market Capitalization38.01 billion USD167.68 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJune 20, 2001February 21, 1973
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FIS and SONY by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FIS vs. SONY: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFISSONY
5-Day Price Return3.85%10.03%
13-Week Price Return-7.75%11.14%
26-Week Price Return-12.18%16.05%
52-Week Price Return-4.41%13.72%
Month-to-Date Return-8.36%8.42%
Year-to-Date Return-9.90%18.49%
10-Day Avg. Volume4.81M16.17M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.64M15.29M
3-Month Volatility26.31%30.35%
Beta1.090.28

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FIS

0.73%

Financial Services Industry

Max
40.58%
Q3
20.06%
Median
10.67%
Q1
4.19%
Min
-10.31%

FIS’s Return on Equity of 0.73% is in the lower quartile for the Financial Services industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

SONY

14.17%

Household Durables Industry

Max
26.99%
Q3
17.28%
Median
12.66%
Q1
7.34%
Min
0.07%

SONY’s Return on Equity of 14.17% is on par with the norm for the Household Durables industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

FIS vs. SONY: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FIS

1.09%

Financial Services Industry

Max
52.86%
Q3
25.58%
Median
12.23%
Q1
6.64%
Min
-9.92%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Financial Services industry, FIS’s Net Profit Margin of 1.09% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

SONY

9.13%

Household Durables Industry

Max
15.50%
Q3
8.99%
Median
6.57%
Q1
4.33%
Min
-0.49%

A Net Profit Margin of 9.13% places SONY in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

FIS vs. SONY: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FIS

17.58%

Financial Services Industry

Max
77.28%
Q3
37.68%
Median
18.17%
Q1
9.27%
Min
-8.19%

FIS’s Operating Profit Margin of 17.58% is around the midpoint for the Financial Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

SONY

11.68%

Household Durables Industry

Max
20.22%
Q3
12.29%
Median
9.54%
Q1
6.30%
Min
-1.92%

SONY’s Operating Profit Margin of 11.68% is around the midpoint for the Household Durables industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

FIS vs. SONY: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFISSONY
Return on Equity (TTM)0.73%14.17%
Return on Assets (TTM)0.33%3.26%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)1.09%9.13%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)17.58%11.68%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)36.68%31.29%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FIS

0.59

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.58
Q3
2.59
Median
1.33
Q1
0.69
Min
0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

SONY

1.09

Household Durables Industry

Max
9.23
Q3
4.50
Median
2.35
Q1
1.29
Min
0.70

SONY’s Current Ratio of 1.09 falls into the lower quartile for the Household Durables industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

FIS vs. SONY: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FIS

0.91

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.96
Q3
2.10
Median
0.57
Q1
0.12
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

SONY

0.19

Household Durables Industry

Max
1.84
Q3
0.90
Median
0.34
Q1
0.19
Min
0.00

SONY’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.19 is typical for the Household Durables industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

FIS vs. SONY: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FIS

6.19

Financial Services Industry

Max
136.23
Q3
56.08
Median
6.55
Q1
2.01
Min
-33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

SONY

104.18

Household Durables Industry

Max
140.40
Q3
77.14
Median
24.53
Q1
5.69
Min
-17.01

SONY’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 104.18 is in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

FIS vs. SONY: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFISSONY
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.591.09
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.481.03
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.910.19
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)6.19104.18

Growth

Revenue Growth

FIS vs. SONY: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FIS vs. SONY: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FIS

2.20%

Financial Services Industry

Max
8.18%
Q3
3.60%
Median
1.56%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FIS’s Dividend Yield of 2.20% is consistent with its peers in the Financial Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

SONY

0.49%

Household Durables Industry

Max
8.95%
Q3
4.19%
Median
1.88%
Q1
0.03%
Min
0.00%

SONY’s Dividend Yield of 0.49% is consistent with its peers in the Household Durables industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

FIS vs. SONY: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FIS

101.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max
155.56%
Q3
63.71%
Median
18.08%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FIS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 101.00% is in the upper quartile for the Financial Services industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

SONY

10.52%

Household Durables Industry

Max
125.12%
Q3
62.43%
Median
39.18%
Q1
5.55%
Min
0.00%

SONY’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 10.52% is within the typical range for the Household Durables industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

FIS vs. SONY: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFISSONY
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.20%0.49%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)101.00%10.52%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FIS

333.55

Financial Services Industry

Max
63.23
Q3
32.10
Median
14.41
Q1
10.81
Min
0.37

At 333.55, FIS’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Financial Services industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

SONY

21.27

Household Durables Industry

Max
29.75
Q3
18.88
Median
13.25
Q1
9.26
Min
6.32

A P/E Ratio of 21.27 places SONY in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

FIS vs. SONY: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FIS

3.62

Financial Services Industry

Max
11.16
Q3
5.45
Median
2.61
Q1
1.25
Min
0.04

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

SONY

1.94

Household Durables Industry

Max
2.12
Q3
1.21
Median
0.83
Q1
0.51
Min
0.18

SONY’s P/S Ratio of 1.94 is in the upper echelon for the Household Durables industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

FIS vs. SONY: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FIS

3.02

Financial Services Industry

Max
7.09
Q3
3.79
Median
1.46
Q1
0.83
Min
0.04

FIS’s P/B Ratio of 3.02 is within the conventional range for the Financial Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

SONY

2.77

Household Durables Industry

Max
4.21
Q3
2.29
Median
1.34
Q1
0.98
Min
0.59

SONY’s P/B Ratio of 2.77 is in the upper tier for the Household Durables industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

FIS vs. SONY: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFISSONY
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)333.5521.27
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.621.94
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.022.77
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)20.4412.12