Seek Returns logo

FIS vs. SAP: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at FIS and SAP, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

FIS is a standard domestic listing, while SAP trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolFISSAP
Company NameFidelity National Information Services, Inc.SAP SE
CountryUnited StatesGermany
GICS SectorFinancialsInformation Technology
GICS IndustryFinancial ServicesSoftware
Market Capitalization34.74 billion USD314.43 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJune 20, 2001September 18, 1995
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FIS and SAP by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FIS vs. SAP: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFISSAP
5-Day Price Return2.82%-0.04%
13-Week Price Return-19.00%-9.96%
26-Week Price Return-11.58%-7.64%
52-Week Price Return-20.68%11.85%
Month-to-Date Return-5.54%-1.64%
Year-to-Date Return-18.36%-3.55%
10-Day Avg. Volume4.82M1.96M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.51M1.50M
3-Month Volatility27.11%29.47%
Beta1.040.99

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FIS

0.73%

Financial Services Industry

Max
39.28%
Q3
18.88%
Median
9.97%
Q1
4.03%
Min
-10.25%

FIS’s Return on Equity of 0.73% is in the lower quartile for the Financial Services industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

SAP

15.09%

Software Industry

Max
66.28%
Q3
21.28%
Median
9.33%
Q1
-8.77%
Min
-48.16%

SAP’s Return on Equity of 15.09% is on par with the norm for the Software industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

FIS vs. SAP: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FIS

1.09%

Financial Services Industry

Max
52.16%
Q3
25.35%
Median
12.68%
Q1
6.11%
Min
-11.69%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Financial Services industry, FIS’s Net Profit Margin of 1.09% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

SAP

18.23%

Software Industry

Max
51.92%
Q3
19.23%
Median
6.98%
Q1
-7.14%
Min
-41.00%

SAP’s Net Profit Margin of 18.23% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Software industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

FIS vs. SAP: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FIS

17.58%

Financial Services Industry

Max
75.57%
Q3
37.78%
Median
19.09%
Q1
10.04%
Min
-19.42%

FIS’s Operating Profit Margin of 17.58% is around the midpoint for the Financial Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

SAP

25.13%

Software Industry

Max
60.40%
Q3
21.25%
Median
9.90%
Q1
-4.97%
Min
-43.50%

An Operating Profit Margin of 25.13% places SAP in the upper quartile for the Software industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

FIS vs. SAP: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFISSAP
Return on Equity (TTM)0.73%15.09%
Return on Assets (TTM)0.33%9.09%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)1.09%18.23%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)17.58%25.13%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)36.68%73.80%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FIS

0.59

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.83
Q3
2.70
Median
1.44
Q1
0.86
Min
0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

SAP

1.03

Software Industry

Max
4.29
Q3
2.37
Median
1.40
Q1
1.03
Min
0.25

SAP’s Current Ratio of 1.03 aligns with the median group of the Software industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

FIS vs. SAP: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FIS

0.91

Financial Services Industry

Max
5.07
Q3
2.14
Median
0.66
Q1
0.12
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

SAP

0.21

Software Industry

Max
2.16
Q3
0.86
Median
0.31
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

SAP’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.21 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

FIS vs. SAP: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FIS

6.19

Financial Services Industry

Max
136.23
Q3
56.08
Median
6.55
Q1
2.01
Min
-33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

SAP

32.64

Software Industry

Max
89.65
Q3
32.64
Median
1.00
Q1
-9.84
Min
-71.23

SAP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 32.64 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Software industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

FIS vs. SAP: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFISSAP
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.591.03
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.481.03
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.910.21
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)6.1932.64

Growth

Revenue Growth

FIS vs. SAP: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FIS vs. SAP: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FIS

2.38%

Financial Services Industry

Max
8.12%
Q3
3.37%
Median
1.70%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FIS’s Dividend Yield of 2.38% is consistent with its peers in the Financial Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

SAP

1.03%

Software Industry

Max
0.22%
Q3
0.11%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

SAP’s Dividend Yield of 1.03% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Software industry. While this may seem attractive, an unusually high yield can sometimes be a warning sign, reflecting a falling stock price or market concerns about the dividend’s sustainability.

FIS vs. SAP: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FIS

101.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max
132.10%
Q3
64.32%
Median
18.23%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FIS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 101.00% is in the upper quartile for the Financial Services industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

SAP

161.64%

Software Industry

Max
3.29%
Q3
2.41%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

At 161.64%, SAP’s Dividend Payout Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical range for the Software industry. While this provides a significant return to shareholders, it may limit funds for reinvestment and could be difficult to sustain.

FIS vs. SAP: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFISSAP
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.38%1.03%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)101.00%161.64%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FIS

308.53

Financial Services Industry

Max
45.81
Q3
30.21
Median
16.29
Q1
10.14
Min
0.70

At 308.53, FIS’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Financial Services industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

SAP

40.66

Software Industry

Max
145.74
Q3
94.88
Median
45.35
Q1
26.66
Min
8.80

SAP’s P/E Ratio of 40.66 is within the middle range for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

FIS vs. SAP: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FIS

3.35

Financial Services Industry

Max
10.88
Q3
5.34
Median
2.64
Q1
1.24
Min
0.06

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

SAP

7.41

Software Industry

Max
25.67
Q3
13.68
Median
8.28
Q1
4.95
Min
0.90

SAP’s P/S Ratio of 7.41 aligns with the market consensus for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

FIS vs. SAP: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FIS

3.02

Financial Services Industry

Max
7.93
Q3
3.78
Median
1.49
Q1
0.88
Min
0.08

FIS’s P/B Ratio of 3.02 is within the conventional range for the Financial Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

SAP

7.74

Software Industry

Max
30.67
Q3
14.92
Median
8.52
Q1
3.89
Min
0.38

SAP’s P/B Ratio of 7.74 is within the conventional range for the Software industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

FIS vs. SAP: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFISSAP
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)308.5340.66
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.357.41
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.027.74
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)18.9036.38