Seek Returns logo

FIS vs. RBLX: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at FIS and RBLX, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolFISRBLX
Company NameFidelity National Information Services, Inc.Roblox Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorFinancialsCommunication Services
GICS IndustryFinancial ServicesEntertainment
Market Capitalization36.44 billion USD82.14 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJune 20, 2001March 10, 2021
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FIS and RBLX by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FIS vs. RBLX: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFISRBLX
5-Day Price Return-2.54%-5.42%
13-Week Price Return-13.86%45.91%
26-Week Price Return-1.09%80.82%
52-Week Price Return-11.87%189.99%
Month-to-Date Return-12.15%-14.01%
Year-to-Date Return-13.63%104.79%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.95M9.46M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.53M8.77M
3-Month Volatility26.25%47.53%
Beta1.091.64

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FIS

0.73%

Financial Services Industry

Max
40.58%
Q3
20.06%
Median
10.67%
Q1
4.19%
Min
-10.31%

FIS’s Return on Equity of 0.73% is in the lower quartile for the Financial Services industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

RBLX

-354.27%

Entertainment Industry

Max
42.50%
Q3
22.75%
Median
12.88%
Q1
7.15%
Min
-6.84%

RBLX has a negative Return on Equity of -354.27%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

FIS vs. RBLX: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FIS

1.09%

Financial Services Industry

Max
52.86%
Q3
25.58%
Median
12.23%
Q1
6.64%
Min
-9.92%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Financial Services industry, FIS’s Net Profit Margin of 1.09% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

RBLX

-23.67%

Entertainment Industry

Max
45.25%
Q3
23.93%
Median
14.60%
Q1
4.89%
Min
-22.94%

RBLX has a negative Net Profit Margin of -23.67%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

FIS vs. RBLX: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FIS

17.58%

Financial Services Industry

Max
77.28%
Q3
37.68%
Median
18.17%
Q1
9.27%
Min
-8.19%

FIS’s Operating Profit Margin of 17.58% is around the midpoint for the Financial Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

RBLX

-27.35%

Entertainment Industry

Max
46.83%
Q3
28.87%
Median
15.26%
Q1
8.95%
Min
-5.53%

RBLX has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -27.35%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

FIS vs. RBLX: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFISRBLX
Return on Equity (TTM)0.73%-354.27%
Return on Assets (TTM)0.33%-13.06%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)1.09%-23.67%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)17.58%-27.35%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)36.68%78.01%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FIS

0.59

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.58
Q3
2.59
Median
1.33
Q1
0.69
Min
0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

RBLX

0.97

Entertainment Industry

Max
6.80
Q3
3.77
Median
1.87
Q1
0.86
Min
0.39

RBLX’s Current Ratio of 0.97 aligns with the median group of the Entertainment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

FIS vs. RBLX: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FIS

0.91

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.96
Q3
2.10
Median
0.57
Q1
0.12
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

RBLX

2.85

Entertainment Industry

Max
1.65
Q3
0.71
Median
0.14
Q1
0.04
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.85, RBLX operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Entertainment industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

FIS vs. RBLX: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FIS

6.19

Financial Services Industry

Max
136.23
Q3
56.08
Median
6.55
Q1
2.01
Min
-33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

RBLX

-845.00

Entertainment Industry

Max
62.11
Q3
31.19
Median
7.50
Q1
2.02
Min
-6.33

RBLX has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -845.00. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

FIS vs. RBLX: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFISRBLX
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.590.97
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.480.96
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.912.85
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)6.19-845.00

Growth

Revenue Growth

FIS vs. RBLX: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FIS vs. RBLX: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FIS

2.27%

Financial Services Industry

Max
8.18%
Q3
3.60%
Median
1.56%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FIS’s Dividend Yield of 2.27% is consistent with its peers in the Financial Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

RBLX

0.00%

Entertainment Industry

Max
2.54%
Q3
1.29%
Median
0.61%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

RBLX currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

FIS vs. RBLX: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FIS

101.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max
155.56%
Q3
63.71%
Median
18.08%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FIS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 101.00% is in the upper quartile for the Financial Services industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

RBLX

0.00%

Entertainment Industry

Max
82.30%
Q3
45.76%
Median
29.16%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

RBLX has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

FIS vs. RBLX: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFISRBLX
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.27%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)101.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FIS

323.87

Financial Services Industry

Max
63.23
Q3
32.10
Median
14.41
Q1
10.81
Min
0.37

At 323.87, FIS’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Financial Services industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

RBLX

--

Entertainment Industry

Max
53.51
Q3
45.31
Median
33.16
Q1
18.21
Min
3.89

P/E Ratio data for RBLX is currently unavailable.

FIS vs. RBLX: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FIS

3.52

Financial Services Industry

Max
11.16
Q3
5.45
Median
2.61
Q1
1.25
Min
0.04

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

RBLX

20.42

Entertainment Industry

Max
12.81
Q3
7.20
Median
4.68
Q1
3.32
Min
0.79

With a P/S Ratio of 20.42, RBLX trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Entertainment industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

FIS vs. RBLX: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FIS

3.02

Financial Services Industry

Max
7.09
Q3
3.79
Median
1.46
Q1
0.83
Min
0.04

FIS’s P/B Ratio of 3.02 is within the conventional range for the Financial Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

RBLX

202.01

Entertainment Industry

Max
17.11
Q3
8.38
Median
5.24
Q1
2.18
Min
0.67

At 202.01, RBLX’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Entertainment industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

FIS vs. RBLX: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFISRBLX
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)323.87--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.5220.42
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.02202.01
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)19.8487.21