Seek Returns logo

FIS vs. NTES: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at FIS and NTES, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

FIS is a standard domestic listing, while NTES trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolFISNTES
Company NameFidelity National Information Services, Inc.NetEase, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesChina
GICS SectorFinancialsCommunication Services
GICS IndustryFinancial ServicesEntertainment
Market Capitalization38.01 billion USD86.89 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateJune 20, 2001June 30, 2000
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FIS and NTES by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FIS vs. NTES: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFISNTES
5-Day Price Return3.85%3.04%
13-Week Price Return-7.75%26.29%
26-Week Price Return-12.18%30.71%
52-Week Price Return-4.41%50.64%
Month-to-Date Return-8.36%3.53%
Year-to-Date Return-9.90%51.22%
10-Day Avg. Volume4.81M0.87M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.64M1.16M
3-Month Volatility26.31%37.46%
Beta1.090.66

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FIS

0.73%

Financial Services Industry

Max
40.58%
Q3
20.06%
Median
10.67%
Q1
4.19%
Min
-10.31%

FIS’s Return on Equity of 0.73% is in the lower quartile for the Financial Services industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

NTES

23.73%

Entertainment Industry

Max
42.50%
Q3
22.75%
Median
12.88%
Q1
7.15%
Min
-6.84%

In the upper quartile for the Entertainment industry, NTES’s Return on Equity of 23.73% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

FIS vs. NTES: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FIS

1.09%

Financial Services Industry

Max
52.86%
Q3
25.58%
Median
12.23%
Q1
6.64%
Min
-9.92%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Financial Services industry, FIS’s Net Profit Margin of 1.09% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

NTES

30.17%

Entertainment Industry

Max
45.25%
Q3
23.93%
Median
14.60%
Q1
4.89%
Min
-22.94%

A Net Profit Margin of 30.17% places NTES in the upper quartile for the Entertainment industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

FIS vs. NTES: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FIS

17.58%

Financial Services Industry

Max
77.28%
Q3
37.68%
Median
18.17%
Q1
9.27%
Min
-8.19%

FIS’s Operating Profit Margin of 17.58% is around the midpoint for the Financial Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

NTES

30.21%

Entertainment Industry

Max
46.83%
Q3
28.87%
Median
15.26%
Q1
8.95%
Min
-5.53%

An Operating Profit Margin of 30.21% places NTES in the upper quartile for the Entertainment industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

FIS vs. NTES: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFISNTES
Return on Equity (TTM)0.73%23.73%
Return on Assets (TTM)0.33%16.92%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)1.09%30.17%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)17.58%30.21%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)36.68%62.71%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FIS

0.59

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.58
Q3
2.59
Median
1.33
Q1
0.69
Min
0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

NTES

3.21

Entertainment Industry

Max
6.80
Q3
3.77
Median
1.87
Q1
0.86
Min
0.39

NTES’s Current Ratio of 3.21 aligns with the median group of the Entertainment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

FIS vs. NTES: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FIS

0.91

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.96
Q3
2.10
Median
0.57
Q1
0.12
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

NTES

0.07

Entertainment Industry

Max
1.65
Q3
0.71
Median
0.14
Q1
0.04
Min
0.00

NTES’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.07 is typical for the Entertainment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

FIS vs. NTES: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FIS

6.19

Financial Services Industry

Max
136.23
Q3
56.08
Median
6.55
Q1
2.01
Min
-33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

NTES

161.13

Entertainment Industry

Max
62.11
Q3
31.19
Median
7.50
Q1
2.02
Min
-6.33

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 161.13, NTES demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Entertainment industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

FIS vs. NTES: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFISNTES
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.593.21
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.483.06
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.910.07
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)6.19161.13

Growth

Revenue Growth

FIS vs. NTES: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FIS vs. NTES: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FIS

2.20%

Financial Services Industry

Max
8.18%
Q3
3.60%
Median
1.56%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FIS’s Dividend Yield of 2.20% is consistent with its peers in the Financial Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

NTES

2.02%

Entertainment Industry

Max
2.54%
Q3
1.29%
Median
0.61%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 2.02%, NTES offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Entertainment industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

FIS vs. NTES: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FIS

101.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max
155.56%
Q3
63.71%
Median
18.08%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FIS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 101.00% is in the upper quartile for the Financial Services industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

NTES

36.47%

Entertainment Industry

Max
82.30%
Q3
45.76%
Median
29.16%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

NTES’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 36.47% is within the typical range for the Entertainment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

FIS vs. NTES: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFISNTES
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.20%2.02%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)101.00%36.47%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FIS

333.55

Financial Services Industry

Max
63.23
Q3
32.10
Median
14.41
Q1
10.81
Min
0.37

At 333.55, FIS’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Financial Services industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

NTES

18.03

Entertainment Industry

Max
53.51
Q3
45.31
Median
33.16
Q1
18.21
Min
3.89

In the lower quartile for the Entertainment industry, NTES’s P/E Ratio of 18.03 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

FIS vs. NTES: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FIS

3.62

Financial Services Industry

Max
11.16
Q3
5.45
Median
2.61
Q1
1.25
Min
0.04

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

NTES

5.44

Entertainment Industry

Max
12.81
Q3
7.20
Median
4.68
Q1
3.32
Min
0.79

NTES’s P/S Ratio of 5.44 aligns with the market consensus for the Entertainment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

FIS vs. NTES: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FIS

3.02

Financial Services Industry

Max
7.09
Q3
3.79
Median
1.46
Q1
0.83
Min
0.04

FIS’s P/B Ratio of 3.02 is within the conventional range for the Financial Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

NTES

3.25

Entertainment Industry

Max
17.11
Q3
8.38
Median
5.24
Q1
2.18
Min
0.67

NTES’s P/B Ratio of 3.25 is within the conventional range for the Entertainment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

FIS vs. NTES: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFISNTES
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)333.5518.03
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.625.44
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.023.25
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)20.4414.64