Seek Returns logo

FIS vs. MCHP: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at FIS and MCHP, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolFISMCHP
Company NameFidelity National Information Services, Inc.Microchip Technology Incorporated
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorFinancialsInformation Technology
GICS IndustryFinancial ServicesSemiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment
Market Capitalization34.74 billion USD34.77 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateJune 20, 2001March 19, 1993
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FIS and MCHP by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FIS vs. MCHP: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFISMCHP
5-Day Price Return2.82%-1.13%
13-Week Price Return-19.00%-10.56%
26-Week Price Return-11.58%26.23%
52-Week Price Return-20.68%-20.15%
Month-to-Date Return-5.54%-0.17%
Year-to-Date Return-18.36%11.79%
10-Day Avg. Volume4.82M7.31M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.51M8.61M
3-Month Volatility27.11%34.03%
Beta1.041.47

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FIS

0.73%

Financial Services Industry

Max
39.28%
Q3
18.88%
Median
9.97%
Q1
4.03%
Min
-10.25%

FIS’s Return on Equity of 0.73% is in the lower quartile for the Financial Services industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

MCHP

-2.26%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
47.13%
Q3
23.50%
Median
9.94%
Q1
0.86%
Min
-20.69%

MCHP has a negative Return on Equity of -2.26%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

FIS vs. MCHP: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FIS

1.09%

Financial Services Industry

Max
52.16%
Q3
25.35%
Median
12.68%
Q1
6.11%
Min
-11.69%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Financial Services industry, FIS’s Net Profit Margin of 1.09% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

MCHP

-3.50%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
52.41%
Q3
23.88%
Median
10.17%
Q1
1.21%
Min
-32.15%

MCHP has a negative Net Profit Margin of -3.50%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

FIS vs. MCHP: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FIS

17.58%

Financial Services Industry

Max
75.57%
Q3
37.78%
Median
19.09%
Q1
10.04%
Min
-19.42%

FIS’s Operating Profit Margin of 17.58% is around the midpoint for the Financial Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

MCHP

2.54%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
58.09%
Q3
27.54%
Median
11.18%
Q1
3.31%
Min
-28.36%

MCHP’s Operating Profit Margin of 2.54% is in the lower quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

FIS vs. MCHP: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFISMCHP
Return on Equity (TTM)0.73%-2.26%
Return on Assets (TTM)0.33%-0.96%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)1.09%-3.50%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)17.58%2.54%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)36.68%54.48%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FIS

0.59

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.83
Q3
2.70
Median
1.44
Q1
0.86
Min
0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

MCHP

2.31

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
6.58
Q3
4.24
Median
2.73
Q1
2.13
Min
1.02

MCHP’s Current Ratio of 2.31 aligns with the median group of the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

FIS vs. MCHP: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FIS

0.91

Financial Services Industry

Max
5.07
Q3
2.14
Median
0.66
Q1
0.12
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

MCHP

0.80

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
1.09
Q3
0.48
Median
0.25
Q1
0.01
Min
0.00

MCHP’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.80. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

FIS vs. MCHP: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FIS

6.19

Financial Services Industry

Max
136.23
Q3
56.08
Median
6.55
Q1
2.01
Min
-33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

MCHP

1.16

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
174.00
Q3
74.71
Median
26.06
Q1
6.43
Min
-7.80

In the lower quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, MCHP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.16 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

FIS vs. MCHP: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFISMCHP
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.592.31
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.481.33
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.910.80
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)6.191.16

Growth

Revenue Growth

FIS vs. MCHP: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FIS vs. MCHP: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FIS

2.38%

Financial Services Industry

Max
8.12%
Q3
3.37%
Median
1.70%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FIS’s Dividend Yield of 2.38% is consistent with its peers in the Financial Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

MCHP

2.91%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
3.72%
Q3
1.51%
Median
0.69%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 2.91%, MCHP offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

FIS vs. MCHP: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FIS

101.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max
132.10%
Q3
64.32%
Median
18.23%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FIS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 101.00% is in the upper quartile for the Financial Services industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

MCHP

123.62%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
205.27%
Q3
88.01%
Median
27.13%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MCHP’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 123.62% is in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

FIS vs. MCHP: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFISMCHP
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.38%2.91%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)101.00%123.62%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FIS

308.53

Financial Services Industry

Max
45.81
Q3
30.21
Median
16.29
Q1
10.14
Min
0.70

At 308.53, FIS’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Financial Services industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

MCHP

--

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
106.30
Q3
61.93
Median
38.96
Q1
23.71
Min
13.06

P/E Ratio data for MCHP is currently unavailable.

FIS vs. MCHP: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FIS

3.35

Financial Services Industry

Max
10.88
Q3
5.34
Median
2.64
Q1
1.24
Min
0.06

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

MCHP

8.14

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
19.99
Q3
10.21
Median
5.23
Q1
2.88
Min
1.13

MCHP’s P/S Ratio of 8.14 aligns with the market consensus for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

FIS vs. MCHP: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FIS

3.02

Financial Services Industry

Max
7.93
Q3
3.78
Median
1.49
Q1
0.88
Min
0.08

FIS’s P/B Ratio of 3.02 is within the conventional range for the Financial Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

MCHP

5.54

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
14.22
Q3
6.94
Median
4.29
Q1
1.99
Min
0.67

MCHP’s P/B Ratio of 5.54 is within the conventional range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

FIS vs. MCHP: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFISMCHP
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)308.53--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.358.14
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.025.54
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)18.9047.51