Seek Returns logo

FIS vs. GRAB: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at FIS and GRAB, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolFISGRAB
Company NameFidelity National Information Services, Inc.Grab Holdings Limited
CountryUnited StatesSingapore
GICS SectorFinancialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryFinancial ServicesGround Transportation
Market Capitalization33.77 billion USD21.91 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateJune 20, 2001December 1, 2020
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FIS and GRAB by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FIS vs. GRAB: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFISGRAB
5-Day Price Return-1.83%-8.31%
13-Week Price Return-9.30%5.46%
26-Week Price Return-17.30%7.55%
52-Week Price Return-27.72%10.63%
Month-to-Date Return2.75%-9.98%
Year-to-Date Return-20.47%14.62%
10-Day Avg. Volume4.06M67.80M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.90M46.65M
3-Month Volatility24.59%39.84%
Beta0.940.91

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FIS

1.03%

Financial Services Industry

Max
34.42%
Q3
16.76%
Median
9.18%
Q1
3.90%
Min
-10.16%

FIS’s Return on Equity of 1.03% is in the lower quartile for the Financial Services industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

GRAB

1.90%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
23.31%
Q3
13.97%
Median
9.07%
Q1
6.97%
Min
1.90%

GRAB’s Return on Equity of 1.90% is in the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

FIS vs. GRAB: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FIS

1.45%

Financial Services Industry

Max
52.16%
Q3
25.33%
Median
13.11%
Q1
7.04%
Min
-8.99%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Financial Services industry, FIS’s Net Profit Margin of 1.45% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

GRAB

3.78%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
33.54%
Q3
16.85%
Median
7.19%
Q1
4.37%
Min
-12.12%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, GRAB’s Net Profit Margin of 3.78% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

FIS vs. GRAB: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FIS

13.74%

Financial Services Industry

Max
81.07%
Q3
40.32%
Median
19.93%
Q1
10.20%
Min
-34.40%

FIS’s Operating Profit Margin of 13.74% is around the midpoint for the Financial Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

GRAB

0.46%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
42.90%
Q3
24.00%
Median
10.93%
Q1
7.11%
Min
-12.12%

GRAB’s Operating Profit Margin of 0.46% is in the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

FIS vs. GRAB: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFISGRAB
Return on Equity (TTM)1.03%1.90%
Return on Assets (TTM)0.46%1.18%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)1.45%3.78%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)13.74%0.46%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)36.65%43.11%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FIS

0.53

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.36
Q3
2.26
Median
1.33
Q1
0.86
Min
0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

GRAB

1.83

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.11
Q3
1.32
Median
1.02
Q1
0.74
Min
0.39

GRAB’s Current Ratio of 1.83 is in the upper quartile for the Ground Transportation industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

FIS vs. GRAB: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FIS

0.94

Financial Services Industry

Max
5.07
Q3
2.14
Median
0.55
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

GRAB

0.33

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.54
Q3
1.52
Median
0.99
Q1
0.49
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, GRAB’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.33 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

FIS vs. GRAB: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FIS

5.52

Financial Services Industry

Max
140.54
Q3
57.67
Median
6.72
Q1
1.93
Min
-33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

GRAB

-3.80

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
59.80
Q3
25.78
Median
8.23
Q1
2.52
Min
-24.57

GRAB has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -3.80. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

FIS vs. GRAB: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFISGRAB
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.531.83
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.411.77
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.940.33
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)5.52-3.80

Growth

Revenue Growth

FIS vs. GRAB: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FIS vs. GRAB: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FIS

2.50%

Financial Services Industry

Max
7.52%
Q3
3.60%
Median
1.75%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FIS’s Dividend Yield of 2.50% is consistent with its peers in the Financial Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

GRAB

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.32%
Q3
2.61%
Median
1.59%
Q1
0.75%
Min
0.00%

GRAB currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

FIS vs. GRAB: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FIS

99.68%

Financial Services Industry

Max
132.10%
Q3
64.32%
Median
17.51%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FIS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 99.68% is in the upper quartile for the Financial Services industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

GRAB

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
149.12%
Q3
76.66%
Median
45.70%
Q1
15.53%
Min
0.00%

GRAB has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

FIS vs. GRAB: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFISGRAB
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.50%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)99.68%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FIS

218.86

Financial Services Industry

Max
46.13
Q3
28.79
Median
13.18
Q1
9.14
Min
0.47

At 218.86, FIS’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Financial Services industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

GRAB

178.03

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
32.48
Q3
25.52
Median
16.81
Q1
12.10
Min
5.45

At 178.03, GRAB’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Ground Transportation industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

FIS vs. GRAB: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FIS

3.18

Financial Services Industry

Max
9.71
Q3
4.81
Median
2.49
Q1
1.25
Min
0.04

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

GRAB

6.73

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
3.82
Q3
2.15
Median
1.37
Q1
0.81
Min
0.19

With a P/S Ratio of 6.73, GRAB trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Ground Transportation industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

FIS vs. GRAB: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FIS

2.49

Financial Services Industry

Max
7.21
Q3
3.51
Median
1.52
Q1
0.88
Min
0.08

FIS’s P/B Ratio of 2.49 is within the conventional range for the Financial Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

GRAB

3.79

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.19
Q3
3.11
Median
1.41
Q1
1.18
Min
0.69

GRAB’s P/B Ratio of 3.79 is in the upper tier for the Ground Transportation industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

FIS vs. GRAB: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFISGRAB
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)218.86178.03
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.186.73
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.493.79
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)17.6235.66
FIS vs. GRAB: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison