FIS vs. FTV: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on August 29, 2025

Here’s a clear look at FIS and FTV, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Symbol	FIS	FTV
Company Name	Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.	Fortive Corporation
Country	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Financials	Industrials
GICS Industry	Financial Services	Machinery
Market Capitalization	36.44 billion USD	16.43 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	June 20, 2001	July 5, 2016
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FIS and FTV by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FIS vs. FTV: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	FIS	FTV
5-Day Price Return	0.29%	1.70%
13-Week Price Return	-12.77%	-31.46%
26-Week Price Return	-0.14%	-39.31%
52-Week Price Return	-13.22%	-33.79%
Month-to-Date Return	-12.16%	1.34%
Year-to-Date Return	-13.64%	-35.24%
10-Day Avg. Volume	3.55M	4.20M
3-Month Avg. Volume	3.46M	3.86M
3-Month Volatility	26.83%	54.79%
Beta	1.08	1.09

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FIS

0.73%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 40.58%
Q3: 20.06%
Median: 10.67%
Q1: 4.19%
Min: -10.31%

FIS’s Return on Equity of 0.73% is in the lower quartile for the Financial Services industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

FTV

7.44%

Machinery Industry

Max: 34.68%
Q3: 19.06%
Median: 13.13%
Q1: 8.53%
Min: -4.87%

FTV’s Return on Equity of 7.44% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

FIS vs. FTV: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FIS

1.09%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 52.86%
Q3: 25.58%
Median: 12.23%
Q1: 6.64%
Min: -9.92%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Financial Services industry, FIS’s Net Profit Margin of 1.09% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

FTV

12.51%

Machinery Industry

Max: 19.74%
Q3: 11.24%
Median: 8.13%
Q1: 5.38%
Min: -1.11%

A Net Profit Margin of 12.51% places FTV in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

FIS vs. FTV: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FIS

17.58%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 77.28%
Q3: 37.68%
Median: 18.17%
Q1: 9.27%
Min: -8.19%

FIS’s Operating Profit Margin of 17.58% is around the midpoint for the Financial Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

FTV

17.22%

Machinery Industry

Max: 26.63%
Q3: 16.15%
Median: 11.27%
Q1: 7.72%
Min: -4.91%

An Operating Profit Margin of 17.22% places FTV in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

FIS vs. FTV: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	FIS	FTV
Return on Equity (TTM)	0.73%	7.44%
Return on Assets (TTM)	0.33%	4.40%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	1.09%	12.51%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	17.58%	17.22%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	36.68%	59.78%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FIS

0.59

Financial Services Industry

Max: 4.58
Q3: 2.59
Median: 1.33
Q1: 0.69
Min: 0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

FTV

0.98

Machinery Industry

Max: 3.83
Q3: 2.32
Median: 1.72
Q1: 1.28
Min: 0.78

FTV’s Current Ratio of 0.98 falls into the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

FIS vs. FTV: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FIS

0.91

Financial Services Industry

Max: 4.96
Q3: 2.10
Median: 0.57
Q1: 0.12
Min: 0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

FTV

0.46

Machinery Industry

Max: 1.49
Q3: 0.75
Median: 0.44
Q1: 0.26
Min: 0.00

FTV’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.46 is typical for the Machinery industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

FIS vs. FTV: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FIS

6.19

Financial Services Industry

Max: 136.23
Q3: 56.08
Median: 6.55
Q1: 2.01
Min: -33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

FTV

6.04

Machinery Industry

Max: 67.55
Q3: 33.79
Median: 13.87
Q1: 7.97
Min: -1.43

In the lower quartile for the Machinery industry, FTV’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 6.04 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

FIS vs. FTV: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	FIS	FTV
Current Ratio (MRQ)	0.59	0.98
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	0.48	0.77
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.91	0.46
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	6.19	6.04

Growth

Revenue Growth

FIS vs. FTV: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FIS vs. FTV: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FIS

2.27%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 8.18%
Q3: 3.60%
Median: 1.56%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

FIS’s Dividend Yield of 2.27% is consistent with its peers in the Financial Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

FTV

0.67%

Machinery Industry

Max: 5.32%
Q3: 2.84%
Median: 1.87%
Q1: 1.09%
Min: 0.00%

FTV’s Dividend Yield of 0.67% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

FIS vs. FTV: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FIS

101.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 155.56%
Q3: 63.71%
Median: 18.08%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

FIS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 101.00% is in the upper quartile for the Financial Services industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

FTV

14.22%

Machinery Industry

Max: 202.17%
Q3: 98.65%
Median: 55.54%
Q1: 29.03%
Min: 0.00%

FTV’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 14.22% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

FIS vs. FTV: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	FIS	FTV
Dividend Yield (TTM)	2.27%	0.67%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	101.00%	14.22%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FIS

323.87

Financial Services Industry

Max: 63.23
Q3: 32.10
Median: 14.41
Q1: 10.81
Min: 0.37

At 323.87, FIS’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Financial Services industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

FTV

21.25

Machinery Industry

Max: 53.66
Q3: 31.29
Median: 22.00
Q1: 16.18
Min: 7.00

FTV’s P/E Ratio of 21.25 is within the middle range for the Machinery industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

FIS vs. FTV: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FIS

3.52

Financial Services Industry

Max: 11.16
Q3: 5.45
Median: 2.61
Q1: 1.25
Min: 0.04

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

FTV

2.66

Machinery Industry

Max: 5.04
Q3: 2.72
Median: 1.67
Q1: 1.04
Min: 0.24

FTV’s P/S Ratio of 2.66 aligns with the market consensus for the Machinery industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

FIS vs. FTV: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FIS

3.02

Financial Services Industry

Max: 7.09
Q3: 3.79
Median: 1.46
Q1: 0.83
Min: 0.04

FIS’s P/B Ratio of 3.02 is within the conventional range for the Financial Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

FTV

2.34

Machinery Industry

Max: 7.23
Q3: 3.90
Median: 2.52
Q1: 1.47
Min: 0.49

FTV’s P/B Ratio of 2.34 is within the conventional range for the Machinery industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

FIS vs. FTV: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	FIS	FTV
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	323.87	21.25
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	3.52	2.66
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	3.02	2.34
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	19.84	11.79