Seek Returns logo

FICO vs. UBER: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at FICO and UBER, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolFICOUBER
Company NameFair Isaac CorporationUber Technologies, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyIndustrials
GICS IndustrySoftwareGround Transportation
Market Capitalization32.05 billion USD189.42 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJuly 22, 1987May 10, 2019
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FICO and UBER by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FICO vs. UBER: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFICOUBER
5-Day Price Return0.13%-1.99%
13-Week Price Return-37.31%3.10%
26-Week Price Return-29.25%29.78%
52-Week Price Return-22.37%31.14%
Month-to-Date Return-7.06%3.51%
Year-to-Date Return-32.93%50.58%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.44M21.46M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.31M21.23M
3-Month Volatility56.71%32.88%
Beta1.371.49

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FICO

145.71%

Software Industry

Max
59.01%
Q3
21.98%
Median
7.15%
Q1
-11.12%
Min
-51.24%

FICO’s Return on Equity of 145.71% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Software industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

UBER

62.42%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
22.11%
Q3
13.84%
Median
9.66%
Q1
7.55%
Min
0.36%

UBER’s Return on Equity of 62.42% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Ground Transportation industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

FICO vs. UBER: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Software and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FICO

32.80%

Software Industry

Max
48.14%
Q3
18.23%
Median
5.60%
Q1
-9.22%
Min
-49.36%

A Net Profit Margin of 32.80% places FICO in the upper quartile for the Software industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

UBER

26.68%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
32.20%
Q3
18.59%
Median
7.11%
Q1
4.13%
Min
-10.38%

A Net Profit Margin of 26.68% places UBER in the upper quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

FICO vs. UBER: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FICO

45.87%

Software Industry

Max
57.34%
Q3
20.60%
Median
7.84%
Q1
-8.72%
Min
-51.37%

An Operating Profit Margin of 45.87% places FICO in the upper quartile for the Software industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

UBER

9.03%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
41.31%
Q3
23.16%
Median
11.33%
Q1
6.82%
Min
-12.08%

UBER’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.03% is around the midpoint for the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

FICO vs. UBER: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFICOUBER
Return on Equity (TTM)145.71%62.42%
Return on Assets (TTM)35.53%24.38%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)32.80%26.68%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)45.87%9.03%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)81.75%33.93%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FICO

0.92

Software Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.31
Median
1.45
Q1
1.03
Min
0.24

FICO’s Current Ratio of 0.92 falls into the lower quartile for the Software industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

UBER

1.11

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.03
Q3
1.26
Median
0.89
Q1
0.73
Min
0.38

UBER’s Current Ratio of 1.11 aligns with the median group of the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

FICO vs. UBER: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FICO

8.46

Software Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
0.90
Median
0.29
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 8.46, FICO operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Software industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

UBER

0.42

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.51
Q3
1.51
Median
1.06
Q1
0.47
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, UBER’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.42 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

FICO vs. UBER: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FICO

7.08

Software Industry

Max
67.02
Q3
19.86
Median
0.70
Q1
-12.50
Min
-53.00

FICO’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.08 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Software industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

UBER

-0.24

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
51.07
Q3
22.54
Median
7.94
Q1
2.72
Min
-24.57

UBER has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -0.24. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

FICO vs. UBER: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFICOUBER
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.921.11
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.830.97
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)8.460.42
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)7.08-0.24

Growth

Revenue Growth

FICO vs. UBER: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FICO vs. UBER: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FICO

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
0.08%
Q3
0.03%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FICO currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

UBER

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.44%
Q3
2.49%
Median
1.53%
Q1
0.39%
Min
0.00%

UBER currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

FICO vs. UBER: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Software and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FICO

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
1.32%
Q3
0.53%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FICO has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

UBER

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
137.07%
Q3
74.71%
Median
41.16%
Q1
15.12%
Min
0.00%

UBER has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

FICO vs. UBER: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFICOUBER
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FICO

50.18

Software Industry

Max
149.35
Q3
100.21
Median
47.97
Q1
26.77
Min
11.68

FICO’s P/E Ratio of 50.18 is within the middle range for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

UBER

14.99

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
42.59
Q3
24.86
Median
16.38
Q1
12.79
Min
4.37

UBER’s P/E Ratio of 14.99 is within the middle range for the Ground Transportation industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

FICO vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FICO

16.46

Software Industry

Max
25.24
Q3
13.52
Median
8.15
Q1
4.87
Min
0.98

FICO’s P/S Ratio of 16.46 is in the upper echelon for the Software industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

UBER

4.00

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
4.02
Q3
2.20
Median
1.23
Q1
0.87
Min
0.22

UBER’s P/S Ratio of 4.00 is in the upper echelon for the Ground Transportation industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

FICO vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FICO

115.88

Software Industry

Max
30.95
Q3
14.91
Median
7.75
Q1
3.60
Min
0.38

At 115.88, FICO’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Software industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

UBER

8.63

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
4.95
Q3
2.78
Median
1.38
Q1
1.17
Min
0.64

At 8.63, UBER’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Ground Transportation industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

FICO vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFICOUBER
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)50.1814.99
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)16.464.00
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)115.888.63
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)42.4422.17