Seek Returns logo

FICO vs. IONQ: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at FICO and IONQ, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolFICOIONQ
Company NameFair Isaac CorporationIonQ, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS IndustrySoftwareTechnology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals
Market Capitalization32.05 billion USD12.23 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJuly 22, 1987January 4, 2021
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FICO and IONQ by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FICO vs. IONQ: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFICOIONQ
5-Day Price Return0.13%1.78%
13-Week Price Return-37.31%25.30%
26-Week Price Return-29.25%-0.15%
52-Week Price Return-22.37%513.24%
Month-to-Date Return-7.06%3.36%
Year-to-Date Return-32.93%-1.34%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.44M22.93M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.31M21.86M
3-Month Volatility56.71%98.83%
Beta1.372.61

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FICO

145.71%

Software Industry

Max
59.01%
Q3
21.98%
Median
7.15%
Q1
-11.12%
Min
-51.24%

FICO’s Return on Equity of 145.71% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Software industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

IONQ

-67.52%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
47.24%
Q3
29.40%
Median
9.11%
Q1
6.06%
Min
-0.79%

IONQ has a negative Return on Equity of -67.52%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

FICO vs. IONQ: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Software and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FICO

32.80%

Software Industry

Max
48.14%
Q3
18.23%
Median
5.60%
Q1
-9.22%
Min
-49.36%

A Net Profit Margin of 32.80% places FICO in the upper quartile for the Software industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

IONQ

-885.21%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
13.86%
Q3
8.17%
Median
4.62%
Q1
3.65%
Min
-0.21%

IONQ has a negative Net Profit Margin of -885.21%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

FICO vs. IONQ: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FICO

45.87%

Software Industry

Max
57.34%
Q3
20.60%
Median
7.84%
Q1
-8.72%
Min
-51.37%

An Operating Profit Margin of 45.87% places FICO in the upper quartile for the Software industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

IONQ

-700.61%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
17.80%
Q3
10.33%
Median
6.31%
Q1
4.86%
Min
2.53%

IONQ has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -700.61%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

FICO vs. IONQ: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFICOIONQ
Return on Equity (TTM)145.71%-67.52%
Return on Assets (TTM)35.53%-57.89%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)32.80%-885.21%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)45.87%-700.61%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)81.75%54.54%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FICO

0.92

Software Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.31
Median
1.45
Q1
1.03
Min
0.24

FICO’s Current Ratio of 0.92 falls into the lower quartile for the Software industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

IONQ

7.76

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
2.47
Q3
1.98
Median
1.40
Q1
1.26
Min
0.70

IONQ’s Current Ratio of 7.76 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

FICO vs. IONQ: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FICO

8.46

Software Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
0.90
Median
0.29
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 8.46, FICO operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Software industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

IONQ

0.00

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
1.47
Q3
0.93
Median
0.32
Q1
0.19
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, IONQ’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

FICO vs. IONQ: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FICO

7.08

Software Industry

Max
67.02
Q3
19.86
Median
0.70
Q1
-12.50
Min
-53.00

FICO’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.08 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Software industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

IONQ

-23.93

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
204.63
Q3
90.22
Median
21.70
Q1
6.79
Min
-23.93

IONQ has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -23.93. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

FICO vs. IONQ: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFICOIONQ
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.927.76
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.837.26
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)8.460.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)7.08-23.93

Growth

Revenue Growth

FICO vs. IONQ: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FICO vs. IONQ: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FICO

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
0.08%
Q3
0.03%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FICO currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

IONQ

0.00%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
4.50%
Q3
3.66%
Median
1.90%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

IONQ currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

FICO vs. IONQ: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Software and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FICO

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
1.32%
Q3
0.53%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FICO has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

IONQ

0.00%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
142.87%
Q3
66.07%
Median
42.79%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

IONQ has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

FICO vs. IONQ: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFICOIONQ
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FICO

50.18

Software Industry

Max
149.35
Q3
100.21
Median
47.97
Q1
26.77
Min
11.68

FICO’s P/E Ratio of 50.18 is within the middle range for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

IONQ

--

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
43.16
Q3
27.56
Median
17.85
Q1
12.48
Min
6.21

P/E Ratio data for IONQ is currently unavailable.

FICO vs. IONQ: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FICO

16.46

Software Industry

Max
25.24
Q3
13.52
Median
8.15
Q1
4.87
Min
0.98

FICO’s P/S Ratio of 16.46 is in the upper echelon for the Software industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

IONQ

233.58

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
4.27
Q3
1.99
Median
0.93
Q1
0.45
Min
0.04

With a P/S Ratio of 233.58, IONQ trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

FICO vs. IONQ: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FICO

115.88

Software Industry

Max
30.95
Q3
14.91
Median
7.75
Q1
3.60
Min
0.38

At 115.88, FICO’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Software industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

IONQ

9.68

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
12.51
Q3
6.11
Median
1.73
Q1
1.01
Min
0.31

IONQ’s P/B Ratio of 9.68 is in the upper tier for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

FICO vs. IONQ: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFICOIONQ
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)50.18--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)16.46233.58
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)115.889.68
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)42.44--