Seek Returns logo

FICO vs. FOUR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at FICO and FOUR, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolFICOFOUR
Company NameFair Isaac CorporationShift4 Payments, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyFinancials
GICS IndustrySoftwareFinancial Services
Market Capitalization42.92 billion USD6.12 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJuly 22, 1987June 5, 2020
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FICO and FOUR by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FICO vs. FOUR: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFICOFOUR
5-Day Price Return-1.20%-6.12%
13-Week Price Return26.35%-26.08%
26-Week Price Return-22.01%-27.10%
52-Week Price Return-24.68%-35.72%
Month-to-Date Return3.68%-5.07%
Year-to-Date Return-13.58%-36.79%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.19M2.92M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.32M2.15M
3-Month Volatility52.71%34.02%
Beta1.271.64

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FICO

145.71%

Software Industry

Max
65.88%
Q3
22.54%
Median
10.46%
Q1
-6.54%
Min
-41.05%

FICO’s Return on Equity of 145.71% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Software industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

FOUR

15.99%

Financial Services Industry

Max
34.42%
Q3
16.76%
Median
9.18%
Q1
3.90%
Min
-10.16%

FOUR’s Return on Equity of 15.99% is on par with the norm for the Financial Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

FICO vs. FOUR: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Software and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FICO

32.75%

Software Industry

Max
53.50%
Q3
20.30%
Median
9.60%
Q1
-4.98%
Min
-41.00%

A Net Profit Margin of 32.75% places FICO in the upper quartile for the Software industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

FOUR

5.02%

Financial Services Industry

Max
52.16%
Q3
25.33%
Median
13.11%
Q1
7.04%
Min
-8.99%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Financial Services industry, FOUR’s Net Profit Margin of 5.02% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

FICO vs. FOUR: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FICO

46.45%

Software Industry

Max
61.99%
Q3
23.67%
Median
10.93%
Q1
-3.57%
Min
-40.19%

An Operating Profit Margin of 46.45% places FICO in the upper quartile for the Software industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

FOUR

7.65%

Financial Services Industry

Max
81.07%
Q3
40.32%
Median
19.93%
Q1
10.20%
Min
-34.40%

FOUR’s Operating Profit Margin of 7.65% is in the lower quartile for the Financial Services industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

FICO vs. FOUR: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFICOFOUR
Return on Equity (TTM)145.71%15.99%
Return on Assets (TTM)35.86%2.99%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)32.75%5.02%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)46.45%7.65%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)82.23%32.61%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FICO

0.83

Software Industry

Max
4.01
Q3
2.27
Median
1.50
Q1
1.03
Min
0.25

FICO’s Current Ratio of 0.83 falls into the lower quartile for the Software industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

FOUR

1.38

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.36
Q3
2.26
Median
1.33
Q1
0.86
Min
0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

FICO vs. FOUR: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FICO

8.46

Software Industry

Max
2.04
Q3
0.86
Median
0.29
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 8.46, FICO operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Software industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

FOUR

2.83

Financial Services Industry

Max
5.07
Q3
2.14
Median
0.55
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

FICO vs. FOUR: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FICO

7.01

Software Industry

Max
89.65
Q3
33.82
Median
1.59
Q1
-10.48
Min
-71.23

FICO’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.01 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Software industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

FOUR

14.17

Financial Services Industry

Max
140.54
Q3
57.67
Median
6.72
Q1
1.93
Min
-33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

FICO vs. FOUR: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFICOFOUR
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.831.38
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.781.31
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)8.462.83
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)7.0114.17

Growth

Revenue Growth

FICO vs. FOUR: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FICO vs. FOUR: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FICO

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
0.34%
Q3
0.17%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FICO currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

FOUR

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max
7.52%
Q3
3.60%
Median
1.75%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FOUR currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

FICO vs. FOUR: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Software and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FICO

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
12.76%
Q3
6.56%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FICO has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

FOUR

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max
132.10%
Q3
64.32%
Median
17.51%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FOUR has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

FICO vs. FOUR: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFICOFOUR
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FICO

65.89

Software Industry

Max
142.78
Q3
72.24
Median
36.21
Q1
24.24
Min
4.55

FICO’s P/E Ratio of 65.89 is within the middle range for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

FOUR

31.39

Financial Services Industry

Max
46.13
Q3
28.79
Median
13.18
Q1
9.14
Min
0.47

A P/E Ratio of 31.39 places FOUR in the upper quartile for the Financial Services industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

FICO vs. FOUR: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FICO

21.58

Software Industry

Max
20.79
Q3
12.71
Median
6.75
Q1
4.56
Min
0.87

With a P/S Ratio of 21.58, FICO trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Software industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

FOUR

1.58

Financial Services Industry

Max
9.71
Q3
4.81
Median
2.49
Q1
1.25
Min
0.04

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

FICO vs. FOUR: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FICO

115.88

Software Industry

Max
30.49
Q3
14.84
Median
8.09
Q1
4.32
Min
0.38

At 115.88, FICO’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Software industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

FOUR

4.10

Financial Services Industry

Max
7.21
Q3
3.51
Median
1.52
Q1
0.88
Min
0.08

FOUR’s P/B Ratio of 4.10 is in the upper tier for the Financial Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

FICO vs. FOUR: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFICOFOUR
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)65.8931.39
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)21.581.58
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)115.884.10
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)58.1017.72