Seek Returns logo

FI vs. WIT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at FI and WIT, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

FI is a standard domestic listing, while WIT trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolFIWIT
Company NameFiserv, Inc.Wipro Limited
CountryUnited StatesIndia
GICS SectorFinancialsInformation Technology
GICS IndustryFinancial ServicesIT Services
Market Capitalization70.43 billion USD27.80 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateSeptember 25, 1986October 19, 2000
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FI and WIT by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FI vs. WIT: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFIWIT
5-Day Price Return-2.00%-0.49%
13-Week Price Return-26.98%-8.79%
26-Week Price Return-42.47%-10.70%
52-Week Price Return-29.81%-11.04%
Month-to-Date Return-2.20%0.85%
Year-to-Date Return-38.62%-20.18%
10-Day Avg. Volume5.66M10.25M
3-Month Avg. Volume5.16M8.82M
3-Month Volatility32.65%21.86%
Beta0.860.68

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FI

12.76%

Financial Services Industry

Max
39.28%
Q3
18.88%
Median
9.97%
Q1
4.03%
Min
-10.25%

FI’s Return on Equity of 12.76% is on par with the norm for the Financial Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

WIT

15.98%

IT Services Industry

Max
32.78%
Q3
19.28%
Median
13.86%
Q1
5.50%
Min
-10.00%

WIT’s Return on Equity of 15.98% is on par with the norm for the IT Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

FI vs. WIT: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FI

16.01%

Financial Services Industry

Max
52.16%
Q3
25.35%
Median
12.68%
Q1
6.11%
Min
-11.69%

FI’s Net Profit Margin of 16.01% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Financial Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

WIT

15.08%

IT Services Industry

Max
19.71%
Q3
11.01%
Median
6.66%
Q1
2.96%
Min
-6.22%

A Net Profit Margin of 15.08% places WIT in the upper quartile for the IT Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

FI vs. WIT: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FI

29.43%

Financial Services Industry

Max
75.57%
Q3
37.78%
Median
19.09%
Q1
10.04%
Min
-19.42%

FI’s Operating Profit Margin of 29.43% is around the midpoint for the Financial Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

WIT

16.91%

IT Services Industry

Max
22.44%
Q3
14.90%
Median
8.82%
Q1
4.91%
Min
-9.89%

An Operating Profit Margin of 16.91% places WIT in the upper quartile for the IT Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

FI vs. WIT: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFIWIT
Return on Equity (TTM)12.76%15.98%
Return on Assets (TTM)4.24%10.44%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)16.01%15.08%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)29.43%16.91%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)61.14%30.34%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FI

1.09

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.83
Q3
2.70
Median
1.44
Q1
0.86
Min
0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

WIT

2.40

IT Services Industry

Max
3.17
Q3
2.00
Median
1.47
Q1
1.05
Min
0.52

WIT’s Current Ratio of 2.40 is in the upper quartile for the IT Services industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

FI vs. WIT: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FI

1.17

Financial Services Industry

Max
5.07
Q3
2.14
Median
0.66
Q1
0.12
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

WIT

0.18

IT Services Industry

Max
3.11
Q3
1.55
Median
0.55
Q1
0.17
Min
0.00

WIT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.18 is typical for the IT Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

FI vs. WIT: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FI

4.56

Financial Services Industry

Max
136.23
Q3
56.08
Median
6.55
Q1
2.01
Min
-33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

WIT

--

IT Services Industry

Max
129.00
Q3
56.00
Median
11.69
Q1
0.77
Min
-28.15

Interest Coverage Ratio data for WIT is currently unavailable.

FI vs. WIT: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFIWIT
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.092.40
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.932.34
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.170.18
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)4.56--

Growth

Revenue Growth

FI vs. WIT: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FI vs. WIT: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FI

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max
8.12%
Q3
3.37%
Median
1.70%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FI currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

WIT

0.21%

IT Services Industry

Max
2.79%
Q3
1.76%
Median
0.58%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

WIT’s Dividend Yield of 0.21% is consistent with its peers in the IT Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

FI vs. WIT: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FI

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max
132.10%
Q3
64.32%
Median
18.23%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FI has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

WIT

175.79%

IT Services Industry

Max
107.85%
Q3
52.62%
Median
22.53%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

At 175.79%, WIT’s Dividend Payout Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical range for the IT Services industry. While this provides a significant return to shareholders, it may limit funds for reinvestment and could be difficult to sustain.

FI vs. WIT: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFIWIT
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.21%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%175.79%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FI

20.38

Financial Services Industry

Max
45.81
Q3
30.21
Median
16.29
Q1
10.14
Min
0.70

FI’s P/E Ratio of 20.38 is within the middle range for the Financial Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

WIT

18.61

IT Services Industry

Max
56.41
Q3
33.17
Median
23.17
Q1
16.18
Min
6.62

WIT’s P/E Ratio of 18.61 is within the middle range for the IT Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

FI vs. WIT: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FI

3.26

Financial Services Industry

Max
10.88
Q3
5.34
Median
2.64
Q1
1.24
Min
0.06

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

WIT

2.81

IT Services Industry

Max
5.99
Q3
4.26
Median
1.93
Q1
0.97
Min
0.12

WIT’s P/S Ratio of 2.81 aligns with the market consensus for the IT Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

FI vs. WIT: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FI

3.79

Financial Services Industry

Max
7.93
Q3
3.78
Median
1.49
Q1
0.88
Min
0.08

FI’s P/B Ratio of 3.79 is in the upper tier for the Financial Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

WIT

3.21

IT Services Industry

Max
12.34
Q3
7.54
Median
3.84
Q1
2.52
Min
0.88

WIT’s P/B Ratio of 3.21 is within the conventional range for the IT Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

FI vs. WIT: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFIWIT
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)20.3818.61
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.262.81
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.793.21
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)13.3516.09