Seek Returns logo

FI vs. UBER: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at FI and UBER, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolFIUBER
Company NameFiserv, Inc.Uber Technologies, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorFinancialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryFinancial ServicesGround Transportation
Market Capitalization76.08 billion USD195.47 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateSeptember 25, 1986May 10, 2019
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FI and UBER by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FI vs. UBER: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFIUBER
5-Day Price Return3.97%2.55%
13-Week Price Return-17.25%1.37%
26-Week Price Return-39.11%16.74%
52-Week Price Return-16.65%26.35%
Month-to-Date Return0.73%6.81%
Year-to-Date Return-31.87%55.39%
10-Day Avg. Volume4.16M18.40M
3-Month Avg. Volume5.44M20.55M
3-Month Volatility34.38%29.59%
Beta0.981.49

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FI

12.76%

Financial Services Industry

Max
40.58%
Q3
20.06%
Median
10.67%
Q1
4.19%
Min
-10.31%

FI’s Return on Equity of 12.76% is on par with the norm for the Financial Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

UBER

62.42%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
22.11%
Q3
13.84%
Median
9.66%
Q1
7.55%
Min
0.36%

UBER’s Return on Equity of 62.42% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Ground Transportation industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

FI vs. UBER: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FI

16.01%

Financial Services Industry

Max
52.86%
Q3
25.58%
Median
12.23%
Q1
6.64%
Min
-9.92%

FI’s Net Profit Margin of 16.01% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Financial Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

UBER

26.68%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
32.20%
Q3
18.59%
Median
7.11%
Q1
4.13%
Min
-10.38%

A Net Profit Margin of 26.68% places UBER in the upper quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

FI vs. UBER: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FI

29.43%

Financial Services Industry

Max
77.28%
Q3
37.68%
Median
18.17%
Q1
9.27%
Min
-8.19%

FI’s Operating Profit Margin of 29.43% is around the midpoint for the Financial Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

UBER

9.03%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
41.31%
Q3
23.16%
Median
11.33%
Q1
6.82%
Min
-12.08%

UBER’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.03% is around the midpoint for the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

FI vs. UBER: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFIUBER
Return on Equity (TTM)12.76%62.42%
Return on Assets (TTM)4.24%24.38%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)16.01%26.68%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)29.43%9.03%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)61.14%33.93%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FI

1.09

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.58
Q3
2.59
Median
1.33
Q1
0.69
Min
0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

UBER

1.11

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.03
Q3
1.26
Median
0.89
Q1
0.73
Min
0.38

UBER’s Current Ratio of 1.11 aligns with the median group of the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

FI vs. UBER: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FI

1.17

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.96
Q3
2.10
Median
0.57
Q1
0.12
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

UBER

0.42

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.51
Q3
1.51
Median
1.06
Q1
0.47
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, UBER’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.42 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

FI vs. UBER: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FI

4.56

Financial Services Industry

Max
136.23
Q3
56.08
Median
6.55
Q1
2.01
Min
-33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

UBER

-0.24

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
51.07
Q3
22.54
Median
7.94
Q1
2.72
Min
-24.57

UBER has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -0.24. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

FI vs. UBER: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFIUBER
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.091.11
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.930.97
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.170.42
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)4.56-0.24

Growth

Revenue Growth

FI vs. UBER: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FI vs. UBER: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FI

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max
8.18%
Q3
3.60%
Median
1.56%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FI currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

UBER

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.44%
Q3
2.49%
Median
1.53%
Q1
0.39%
Min
0.00%

UBER currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

FI vs. UBER: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FI

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max
155.56%
Q3
63.71%
Median
18.08%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FI has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

UBER

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
137.07%
Q3
74.71%
Median
41.16%
Q1
15.12%
Min
0.00%

UBER has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

FI vs. UBER: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFIUBER
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FI

22.38

Financial Services Industry

Max
63.23
Q3
32.10
Median
14.41
Q1
10.81
Min
0.37

FI’s P/E Ratio of 22.38 is within the middle range for the Financial Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

UBER

15.49

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
42.59
Q3
24.86
Median
16.38
Q1
12.79
Min
4.37

UBER’s P/E Ratio of 15.49 is within the middle range for the Ground Transportation industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

FI vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FI

3.58

Financial Services Industry

Max
11.16
Q3
5.45
Median
2.61
Q1
1.25
Min
0.04

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

UBER

4.13

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
4.02
Q3
2.20
Median
1.23
Q1
0.87
Min
0.22

With a P/S Ratio of 4.13, UBER trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Ground Transportation industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

FI vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FI

3.79

Financial Services Industry

Max
7.09
Q3
3.79
Median
1.46
Q1
0.83
Min
0.04

FI’s P/B Ratio of 3.79 is within the conventional range for the Financial Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

UBER

8.63

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
4.95
Q3
2.78
Median
1.38
Q1
1.17
Min
0.64

At 8.63, UBER’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Ground Transportation industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

FI vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFIUBER
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)22.3815.49
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.584.13
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.798.63
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)14.6722.90